<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 428 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110603</link>
    <description>Wrongful availment of Cenvat credit on inputs used in exempted final products was not disputed, and the credit reversal was confirmed. The only issue was penalty, and the Tribunal held that payment of the duty amount before issuance of the show cause notice made a penalty equal to the duty amount unwarranted on the facts. The penalty was therefore reduced to Rs. 1 lakh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:01:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 428 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110603</link>
      <description>Wrongful availment of Cenvat credit on inputs used in exempted final products was not disputed, and the credit reversal was confirmed. The only issue was penalty, and the Tribunal held that payment of the duty amount before issuance of the show cause notice made a penalty equal to the duty amount unwarranted on the facts. The penalty was therefore reduced to Rs. 1 lakh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>