Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 33/99, granting exemption to an existing manufacturing unit in the North-East Region on a 25% increase in installed capacity, could be denied on the ground that the increase was not in each and every section of the unit.
Analysis: The notification did not stipulate that every section of the manufacturing unit must separately show an increase in capacity. The decisive requirement was an overall increase of 25% in installed capacity. Since the evidence accepted below showed such overall enhancement, the Revenue's objection based on the absence of expansion in the drying section alone could not defeat the exemption.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was available, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification requires an increase in installed capacity by a specified percentage, the condition is satisfied by an overall increase in the unit's capacity and not by a section-wise increase in every component of the manufacturing process.