Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/99-C.E. despite no expansion in the weaving section, when the manufacturing unit as a whole had achieved an overall increase in installed capacity.
Analysis: The notification did not require increase in each and every section of the unit. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had established an overall expansion of installed capacity by about 25% through additions in the spinning and processing sections, supported by engineering and departmental certifications. Since the Revenue did not dispute the overall increase, the absence of expansion in the weaving section alone was not a ground to deny the exemption.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.