Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 58/86 dated 10-2-1986 could be denied merely because the value of the tools was recovered from the buyers, when the tools were admittedly used in the manufacture of the final product in the same factory.
Analysis: The only requirement in the notification was that the tools manufactured in the factory must be used in the same factory where they were manufactured. The admitted use of the tools in the manufacture of the final product satisfied that condition. The notification did not prescribe any condition relating to ownership of the tools, and recovery of their value from the buyers did not provide a basis to deny the exemption.
Conclusion: The exemption could not be denied on the ground of transfer of ownership or recovery of value from the buyers, and the denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable.