Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 714

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... None, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  The Revenue is aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. 267/94, dt. 21-7-94 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the order-in-original by which the Assistant Commissioner denied the benefit of Notification No. 58/86, dt. 10-2-1986 solely on the ground that on paper, the tools had been sold to the buyer. How....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appeared on behalf of the respondents despite notice served through the Department. 3. On a careful consideration and perusal of the notification in question we notice that the Revenue does not dispute about the fact that all the tools have been used in the manufacture of the final product. However, assessee had recovered the value of the tools from the ultimate buyers on which ground the ....