Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether broken and damaged concrete poles arising in the manufacture of PSC poles were liable to excise duty under Heading 68.07.
Analysis: The disputed goods were broken poles arising in the course of manufacture and were not capable of being described as articles falling under the residuary heading relied upon by the Revenue. The Commissioner (Appeals) had treated them as non-excisable waste and scrap, and no material was shown to disturb that view.
Conclusion: The broken and damaged concrete poles were not liable to duty under Heading 68.07, and the appeal filed by the Revenue failed.