<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 450 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106991</link>
    <description>Broken and damaged concrete poles arising during the manufacture of PSC poles were held not classifiable under Heading 68.07. They were treated as non-excisable waste and scrap because they were merely by-products of the manufacturing process and not articles answering the residuary description relied on by the Revenue. The Commissioner (Appeals) view was not displaced by any contrary material, so duty was not payable and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:33:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 450 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106991</link>
      <description>Broken and damaged concrete poles arising during the manufacture of PSC poles were held not classifiable under Heading 68.07. They were treated as non-excisable waste and scrap because they were merely by-products of the manufacturing process and not articles answering the residuary description relied on by the Revenue. The Commissioner (Appeals) view was not displaced by any contrary material, so duty was not payable and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>