Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product described as phenol formaldehyde resins was correctly classifiable under sub-heading 3909.51 or was classifiable as other phenolic resins under sub-heading 3909.59.
Analysis: The department relied on chemical test reports to contend that the goods were modified phenolic resins and not phenol formaldehyde resins. The earlier test report only described the sample as phenolic resin in lumps and did not state that it was not phenol formaldehyde resin. The later report was not shown to have been furnished to the assessees, and the record did not contain sufficient material to prove that the goods were different from those declared. The finding of classification against the assessees was therefore unsupported.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the department was not sustained and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.