<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 667 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106854</link>
    <description>Classification of phenol formaldehyde resins under sub-heading 3909.51, rather than as other phenolic resins under sub-heading 3909.59, turned on whether the chemical test material established that the goods were modified phenolic resins. The earlier report described the sample only as phenolic resin in lumps and did not exclude phenol formaldehyde resin, while the later report was not shown to have been furnished to the assessee. On the available record, there was insufficient material to show that the goods differed from the declared product, so the departmental classification was not sustained and relief was given to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 667 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106854</link>
      <description>Classification of phenol formaldehyde resins under sub-heading 3909.51, rather than as other phenolic resins under sub-heading 3909.59, turned on whether the chemical test material established that the goods were modified phenolic resins. The earlier report described the sample only as phenolic resin in lumps and did not exclude phenol formaldehyde resin, while the later report was not shown to have been furnished to the assessee. On the available record, there was insufficient material to show that the goods differed from the declared product, so the departmental classification was not sustained and relief was given to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>