Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether electronic cash registers were classifiable under Entry 90 of Schedule C, Part II of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, or under Entry 97(b) of the same Schedule.
Analysis: The competing entries had to be construed on their language. Entry 90 specifically covered cash registering machines and other enumerated machines without any express limitation as to the mode of operation, while Entry 97(b) was framed as a residual category for electronic systems, instruments, apparatus and appliances other than those specified elsewhere. The principle that a specific entry prevails over a general entry was applied. The Court held that where the description in the specific entry fully covered the goods, resort to the broader electronic-goods entry was impermissible. The fact that the machines performed additional electronic functions did not alter their essential character as cash registering machines. The Court also noted that the assessee had originally collected tax at the rate applicable to Entry 90 and had claimed the lower rate under Entry 97(b) only after a rate-reducing notification.
Conclusion: Electronic cash registers were classifiable under Entry 90 and not under Entry 97(b); the assessee's claim to the contrary failed.