Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coal ash or cinder is covered by the term "coal" in Entry 22 in Part V of Schedule II of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994, or is taxable under the residuary Entry 39 in Part IV of Schedule II.
Analysis: The relevant entry was construed in the light of the strict letter of a taxing statute and the commercial sense in which the commodity is understood. The Court held that coal ash is not a new and distinct commodity merely because it is partly burnt coal; it retains the properties of coal, is treated in commerce as cinder, and has historically been understood as falling within the expression coal. The residuary entry can be invoked only when the specific entry does not cover the commodity, and the Court found that Entry 22 is wide enough to include coal ash or cinder. The earlier Full Bench view to the contrary was held not to reflect the correct position.
Conclusion: Coal ash or cinder falls within the term "coal" under Entry 22 in Part V of Schedule II of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 and is not taxable under the residuary Entry 39 in Part IV of Schedule II.
Ratio Decidendi: In construing a fiscal entry, a commodity must be classified according to its commercial and popular meaning, and a residuary entry cannot be used where the specific entry, properly construed, already covers the goods.