Functional classification of a hybrid amplifier under sales tax law depended on its broader electronic use, not cable television alone.

A hybrid amplifier or line extender was classified by its functional character as an active electronic signal-boosting device with uses beyond cable television. Because it was not an essential component of a television set, receiver, antenna, or their accessories, it did not fall within the specific television-related entry. The residual entry for electronic systems, instruments and appliances not otherwise covered applied instead, so mere use in cable television transmission was insufficient to attract the narrower classification. The product was therefore held classifiable under the general electronic goods entry, and the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether the product "Hybrid Amplifier" or "Line Extender" was classifiable as an accessory of cable television under Schedule Entry C-II-124 or as a general electronic item under Schedule Entry C-II-126 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

Analysis: The product was examined on its functional and technical characteristics. It was found to be an active electronic device that boosts signals and has multiple uses beyond cable television, including other radio and electronic applications. It was not an essential component of a television set, television receiver, antenna, or any of their accessories. Schedule Entry C-II-126 was treated as a residual entry covering electronic systems, instruments and appliances not specifically covered elsewhere, whereas Schedule Entry C-II-124 was confined to television-related goods and their accessories. Mere use in cable television transmission was held insufficient to bring the product within the specific television entry.

Conclusion: The product was held to fall under Schedule Entry C-II-126 and not under Schedule Entry C-II-124, and the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

---