Specific tariff classification prevails over residuary heading for composite bobbins, supporting refund eligibility under the plastic goods heading.

Fibre aluminium bobbins used for conveyance of yarn, and made of plastic and aluminium, were held classifiable under Heading 39.23 as articles for the conveyance or packing of goods of plastic rather than under the residuary Heading 76.16 for other articles of aluminium. Applying Interpretative Rule 3, the more specific description prevailed over the residuary entry, and the predominance of plastic by weight supported that classification. On that basis, the classification claim and the consequential refund claim were allowed in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether fibre aluminium bobbins manufactured by the appellant were classifiable under Heading 39.23 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as articles for conveyance or packing of goods of plastic, or under Heading 76.16 as other articles of aluminium, and whether the refund claim based on such classification was consequently allowable.

Analysis: The bobbins were used for conveyance of yarn and were composite goods made of plastic and aluminium. On the facts, the product was examined in the light of Interpretative Rule 3, which requires preference to be given first to the heading providing the most specific description. Heading 39.23 specifically covers articles for the conveyance or packing of goods of plastic, whereas Heading 76.16 is a residuary heading for other articles of aluminium. Since the product fit the more specific description under Heading 39.23, recourse to the residuary heading was not justified. The Court also noted that the plastic content was predominant in weight, which supported classification under Heading 39.23.

Conclusion: The bobbins were classifiable under Heading 39.23 and not under Heading 76.16. The classification appeal and the consequential refund appeal were both decided in favour of the assessee.

---