TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court: Washing Machines as 'Electronic Goods' for Lower Tax Rate Decision</h1> <h3>BPL. LTD. Versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH</h3> BPL. LTD. Versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH - 2001 (127) E.L.T. 655 (SC) , [2001] 121 STC 450 (SC), 2001 AIR 665, 2001 (1) SCR 195, 2001 (2) SCC 139, 2001 ... Issues:Interpretation of the term 'electronic goods' for sales tax purposes.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Interpretation of 'electronic goods' for sales tax purposesThe primary issue in this case was whether Fully Automatic Washing Machines could be classified as 'electronic goods' to attract a lower rate of sales tax. The dispute arose from a notification issued by the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act in 1988, which reduced the tax rate on the sale of 'electronic goods' to 2 paise in a rupee. The definition of 'electronic goods' in the notification included various categories such as consumer electronics, electronic test instruments, and more. The appellants argued that their washing machines operated on Fuzzy Logic Computer Program, controlled by micro-computer technology, and should be considered electronic appliances operating on electronic principles.Issue 1 Analysis:The High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal had previously ruled against the appellants, stating that although the control panel of the washing machines contained electronic components, the machines themselves did not operate on electronic principles. The High Court highlighted that the machines functioned based on centrifugal force, which they considered electro-mechanical rather than electronic. However, the Supreme Court analyzed the definition of 'electronic goods' in the notification, emphasizing the phrase 'operating on electronic principles.' The Court referred to expert definitions of 'electronic' from sources like the Concise Oxford Dictionary and the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology to support their interpretation.Issue 1 Conclusion:The Supreme Court concluded that the washing machines, despite running on centrifugal force, were controlled and operated by microprocessors, directing electric currents in a programmed manner to carry out automatic functions like wash cycles, rinse cycles, and spin/dry processes. The Court noted that the machines met the criteria of electronic goods as per the notification, as all their functions were electronically controlled. Additionally, a government memorandum listing consumer electronic products supported the inclusion of washing machines under the category of 'electronic goods.' Therefore, the Court allowed the appeals, granting the appellants the benefit of the lower sales tax rate specified for electronic goods in the notification.This detailed analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal judgment, focusing on the interpretation of the term 'electronic goods' and its application to Fully Automatic Washing Machines for sales tax purposes.
TaxTMI 