Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of arrangement, as modified by the appointed date and approved by the shareholders and creditors, deserved sanction by the Court and would bind the shareholders of the transferee-company.
Analysis: The scheme had been unanimously approved by the shareholders and creditors, subject to the modification of the appointed date. Notices had been issued to the concerned statutory authorities and the scheme had been duly advertised, but no objection was raised. The arrangement was found not to be prejudicial to any person. The sanction was also made subject to approval by the Calcutta High Court in respect of the transferor-companies.
Conclusion: The scheme of arrangement was sanctioned and declared binding on the shareholders of the transferee-company, subject to sanction by the Calcutta High Court in respect of the transferor-companies.