<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 924 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105343</link>
    <description>A scheme of arrangement, modified by the appointed date, was sanctioned because shareholders and creditors unanimously approved it, statutory notices were issued, no objection was raised by the concerned authorities, and the arrangement was found not prejudicial to any person. The sanction made the scheme binding on the shareholders of the transferee-company, subject to approval by the Calcutta High Court in respect of the transferor-companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:34:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 924 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105343</link>
      <description>A scheme of arrangement, modified by the appointed date, was sanctioned because shareholders and creditors unanimously approved it, statutory notices were issued, no objection was raised by the concerned authorities, and the arrangement was found not prejudicial to any person. The sanction made the scheme binding on the shareholders of the transferee-company, subject to approval by the Calcutta High Court in respect of the transferor-companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>