Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference application under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was maintainable against a miscellaneous order that was not passed under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: Section 35G permits a reference to the High Court only from an order of the Tribunal under Section 35C. The impugned miscellaneous order merely accepted compliance with the stay order and vacated the detention order; it was not an order made under Section 35C. Since the appeal was still pending before the Tribunal and the order sought to be referred did not satisfy the statutory precondition, the reference mechanism could not be invoked.
Conclusion: The reference application was not maintainable and stood rejected.