TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Denies Modvat Credit for HSD Oil: Rule 57A Upheld</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE-II Versus MYSORE CEMENTS LTD.</h3> The Tribunal ruled that HSD oil was not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, aligning with legislative provisions and established case law. The ... Modvat/Cenvat - Modvat on HSD Issues:- Modvat credit on HSD oil eligibility under Rule 57AAnalysis:The issue in this case revolves around the eligibility of HSD oil for Modvat credit under Rule 57A. The Assistant Commissioner disallowed Modvat credit on HSD oil, ordering its reversal if unutilized or cash payment if already used. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal, citing the Tribunal's decision in a similar case. However, the Revenue challenged this decision, arguing that recent legislation and Tribunal decisions rendered HSD oil ineligible for credit during a specific period.The Departmental Representative contended that Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000, and Tribunal decisions established that HSD oil was not admissible for credit during a defined period. On the other hand, the Respondent argued that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 112(2)(a) of the Finance Act, 2000, as it barred suits for allowing credit on HSD oil. The Respondent also highlighted the irrelevance of the appeal due to the credit reversal already carried out.The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of the Finance Act, 2000, and previous decisions, concluding that HSD oil was not an eligible input for Modvat credit. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the appeal was not maintainable, emphasizing that it was filed by the Revenue to reverse the Commissioner's decision and disallow the credit. Relying on the precedent set by the Chemo Pulp Tissues case, the Tribunal upheld the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and disallowing the Modvat credit on HSD oil.In summary, the Tribunal ruled that HSD oil did not qualify for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, aligning with the legislative provisions and established case law. The decision emphasized the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal and the inadmissibility of HSD oil for credit purposes, ultimately allowing the Revenue's appeal and overturning the Commissioner's decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
