<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1030 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that HSD oil was not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, aligning with legislative provisions and established case law. The decision emphasized the maintainability of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the inadmissibility of HSD oil for credit purposes, ultimately allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:40:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1030 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that HSD oil was not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, aligning with legislative provisions and established case law. The decision emphasized the maintainability of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the inadmissibility of HSD oil for credit purposes, ultimately allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>