1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal partly allowed: Unexplained gold bars removed, penalty dismissed, interest to be calculated.</h1> The appeal was partly allowed. The addition of unexplained investment in gold bars was deleted as the Tribunal found no challenge from the party involved ... Unexplained investments Issues:1. Addition of unexplained investment in gold bars.2. Initiation of penalty proceedings.3. Levy of interest under various sections of the Income-tax Act.Analysis:1. Addition of unexplained investment in gold bars:The appeal was filed against the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the addition of Rs. 1,20,196 on account of unexplained investment in gold bars. The assessee initially denied ownership of the gold bars but later admitted ownership of a portion. The Assessing Officer made a protective addition in the assessee's case as the substantive addition was made in Shri Palia's case. The Tribunal noted that since Shri Palia did not challenge the addition in his case, the addition in the assessee's case was deleted. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue of ownership of the gold bars was separate and could be challenged in a court, but it did not prejudice the assessee's appeal. Therefore, the addition of Rs. 1,20,196 was deleted.2. Initiation of penalty proceedings:The assessee raised a ground regarding the initiation of penalty proceedings under various sections of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed this ground, stating that as no prejudice was caused to the assessee by the initiation of penalty proceedings, the ground raised was dismissed.3. Levy of interest under various sections:Another ground of appeal related to the levy of interest under sections 215, 217, and 139(8) of the Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to calculate interest, if any, based on the income determined by them. This ground was considered to be consequential in nature.In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed, with the addition of unexplained investment in gold bars being deleted, the initiation of penalty proceedings being dismissed, and directions given for the calculation of interest under relevant sections of the Income-tax Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
