<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 389 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103138</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The addition of unexplained investment in gold bars was deleted as the Tribunal found no challenge from the party involved in the substantive addition. The initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed due to no prejudice caused to the assessee. Directions were given for the calculation of interest under relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, which was deemed consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:23:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 389 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103138</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The addition of unexplained investment in gold bars was deleted as the Tribunal found no challenge from the party involved in the substantive addition. The initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed due to no prejudice caused to the assessee. Directions were given for the calculation of interest under relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, which was deemed consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>