Natural justice and reasoned orders required for decisions on waste, scrap destruction, and credit reversal.

A unilateral communication recording a decision on destruction of waste and scrap and reversal of credit could not operate as a valid adjudication because it was not in appealable form, gave no proper hearing, and contained no reasoned determination. An order affecting rights must be supported by reasons and passed in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The communication was set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to issue a fresh speaking order after observing natural justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned one-sided communication, which recorded the Commissioner's decision on destruction of waste and scrap and reversal of credit, could be sustained, and whether the matter required a fresh speaking order after observance of natural justice.

Analysis: The communication was not in an appealable form and merely conveyed a unilateral decision without affording a proper hearing or recording a reasoned determination. An order affecting rights in such a manner must be supported by reasons and must be passed after following the principles of natural justice. Since the communication did not satisfy these requirements, it could not stand as the operative adjudication.

Conclusion: The communication was set aside and the Commissioner was directed to pass a speaking order after following the principles of natural justice.

---