Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order directing supply of certified copies of proxies from the summoned record was a "judgment" appealable under section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, and whether the appeal against that order was maintainable.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the meaning of "judgment" in section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, read with the principles governing appealability of interlocutory orders. The Court applied the test that only orders which directly and immediately affect vital and valuable rights of a party, or work serious injustice, can be treated as judgments. The impugned order concerned certified copies of proxies that were relevant to the trial and had been summoned from another court; it did not determine any substantive right in the suit and did not prejudice the appellant in any direct or immediate manner. The statutory scheme relating to proxies under section 176 of the Companies Act, 1956 also indicated that proxies are inspectable documents and do not enjoy secrecy in the manner suggested by the appellant.
Conclusion: The impugned order was not a judgment within section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, and the appeal was not maintainable. The challenge to supply of certified copies therefore failed.