Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after inspection of company records has already been allowed and completed, the respondents could be permitted to obtain xerox copies of the inspected documents for use in proceedings under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The appeal concerned a procedural direction for supply of copies of documents already inspected. The court noted that inspection had been completed, evidence had already commenced, and further witnesses remained to be examined. It held that, in such circumstances, allowing copies would assist the fair and efficient conduct of the trial and would not cause prejudice because the documents were already within the respondents' knowledge. The court also observed that, apart from the specific procedural framework, the court could exercise its power under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, where justice so required. The restriction on inspection under section 209(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, could not be read as defeating the respondents' ability to use relevant books of account in support of their case under sections 397 and 398.
Conclusion: The respondents were entitled to xerox copies of the inspected documents, and the order directing supply of copies was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inspection of documents has already been completed and the copies are sought for effective conduct of evidence in company-law proceedings, the court may direct supply of copies in exercise of its procedural and inherent powers if no real prejudice is shown.