https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101498 An order directing supply of certified copies of proxies from summoned records was held not to be a "judgment" under section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 because it did not directly and immediately affect any vital or valuable right or cause serious injustice. Applying the settled test for appealability of interlocutory orders, the Court noted that the direction related only to documents relevant to the trial and did not determine any substantive right in the suit. It also observed that proxies are inspectable documents under the Companies Act framework and are not subject to the secrecy claimed. The appeal was therefore not maintainable. en-us Thu, 07 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:48:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101498 An order directing supply of certified copies of proxies from summoned records was held not to be a "judgment" under section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 because it did not directly and immediately affect any vital or valuable right or cause serious injustice. Applying the settled test for appealability of interlocutory orders, the Court noted that the direction related only to documents relevant to the trial and did not determine any substantive right in the suit. It also observed that proxies are inspectable documents under the Companies Act framework and are not subject to the secrecy claimed. The appeal was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 07 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101498