Stay of suit under civil procedure failed where declaratory relief differed from pending company law proceedings.

Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies only when the same matter is directly and substantially in issue in a prior proceeding between the same parties and the earlier forum can grant the relief claimed. In this note, the suit for declaration of valid renomination as director was treated as distinct from proceedings before the Company Law Board concerning oppression, mismanagement, and board changes. Because the Company Law Board could not grant the specific declaratory relief sought, and had already dismissed the related applications under sections 408 and 409 of the Companies Act, 1956, a stay of the suit was held not to be available.

---

---

Issues: Whether the suit was liable to be stayed under section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, on the ground that similar proceedings were pending before the Company Law Board under sections 408 and 409 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Analysis: Section 10 applies only where the matter in issue in the suit is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted proceeding between the same parties litigating under the same title, and the earlier forum is competent to grant the relief claimed. The subject matter of the suit for declaration of valid renomination as director was held to be different from the proceedings before the Company Law Board, which concerned preventive action regarding oppression, mismanagement, and change in the board. The Company Law Board had already dismissed the applications under sections 408 and 409, and in any event it was not competent to grant the specific declaratory relief sought in the suit.

Conclusion: Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was not attracted and the prayer for stay of the suit was rejected.

---