<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 299 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101463</link>
    <description>Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies only when the same matter is directly and substantially in issue in a prior proceeding between the same parties and the earlier forum can grant the relief claimed. In this note, the suit for declaration of valid renomination as director was treated as distinct from proceedings before the Company Law Board concerning oppression, mismanagement, and board changes. Because the Company Law Board could not grant the specific declaratory relief sought, and had already dismissed the related applications under sections 408 and 409 of the Companies Act, 1956, a stay of the suit was held not to be available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:59:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 299 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101463</link>
      <description>Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies only when the same matter is directly and substantially in issue in a prior proceeding between the same parties and the earlier forum can grant the relief claimed. In this note, the suit for declaration of valid renomination as director was treated as distinct from proceedings before the Company Law Board concerning oppression, mismanagement, and board changes. Because the Company Law Board could not grant the specific declaratory relief sought, and had already dismissed the related applications under sections 408 and 409 of the Companies Act, 1956, a stay of the suit was held not to be available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>