1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal upholds Ranitidine Injection classification under CET</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of Ranitidine Injection under CET sub-heading 3003.20 as claimed by the respondent, ... Medicament - Ranitidine Injection affixed with word ‘Glaxo’ The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the classification of Ranitidine Injection under CET sub-heading 3003.20 as claimed by the respondent, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the use of the word 'Glaxo' on the label did not establish a relationship between the word and the medicine, considering it a house mark as per the Drugs Rules. The decision was based on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Astra Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE [1995 (75) E.L.T. 214 (S.C.)].
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
