Modvat credit on fuel used for exempted goods required reconsideration after the relevant exemption rule was overlooked.

Modvat credit on fuel used in the manufacture of exempted final products was in dispute, with the challenge confined to whether reversal of credit was required. The adjudicating authority treated Rule 57CC(9) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as dealing only with separate account maintenance for fuel, but the relevant provision, Rule 57C(3) inserted by Notification No. 35/96, was not considered before liability was determined. As the statutory provision directly relevant to the issue was overlooked, the decision could not stand. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a personal hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether credit taken on fuel used in the manufacture of exempted final products was liable to be reversed, and whether the matter required reconsideration because the relevant rule permitting exemption for fuel was not considered.

Analysis: The challenge was confined to the demand for reversal of Modvat credit on fuel used for exempted final products. The adjudicating authority proceeded on the footing that sub-rule (9) of Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 exempted only the maintenance of separate accounts for fuel, not reversal of credit. However, sub-rule (3) of Rule 57C, inserted by Notification No. 35/96 dated 31-8-1996, specifically had to be examined, and that provision was not considered while deciding the liability. Since the issue was decided without taking the relevant statutory provision into account, the decision could not stand as it was.

Conclusion: The order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after affording a personal hearing to the appellant.

---