<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 685 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100269</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on fuel used in the manufacture of exempted final products was in dispute, with the challenge confined to whether reversal of credit was required. The adjudicating authority treated Rule 57CC(9) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as dealing only with separate account maintenance for fuel, but the relevant provision, Rule 57C(3) inserted by Notification No. 35/96, was not considered before liability was determined. As the statutory provision directly relevant to the issue was overlooked, the decision could not stand. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 685 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100269</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on fuel used in the manufacture of exempted final products was in dispute, with the challenge confined to whether reversal of credit was required. The adjudicating authority treated Rule 57CC(9) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as dealing only with separate account maintenance for fuel, but the relevant provision, Rule 57C(3) inserted by Notification No. 35/96, was not considered before liability was determined. As the statutory provision directly relevant to the issue was overlooked, the decision could not stand. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>