Tribunal power to admit fresh claims affirmed, allowing new characterisation of expenditures on appeal despite earlier return positions.
The tribunal's plenary appellate authority permits admission of a fresh or inconsistent claim in appeal even when the return had taken a contrary position; in Wipro Finance the tribunal, noting the department's representative's no-objection and relying on precedent, entertained a claim to treat previously capitalised amounts as revenue expenditure, a view the Supreme Court treated as within the tribunal's competence and not curtailed by limitations applicable to the assessing authority. (AI Summary)
The tribunal's plenary appellate authority permits admission of a fresh or inconsistent claim in appeal even when the return had taken a contrary position; in Wipro Finance the tribunal, noting the department's representative's no-objection and relying on precedent, entertained a claim to treat previously capitalised amounts as revenue expenditure, a view the Supreme Court treated as within the tribunal's competence and not curtailed by limitations applicable to the assessing authority. (AI Summary)
TaxTMI