Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

About Section not updated!

0 Records Found

No issues posted by the user yet!

0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 20 of 37 Results
Like2Bookmark
Supply-chain control and rules of origin shape India's challenge as China tightens pressure on manufacturing relocation
China's reported Decrees 834 and 835 expand regulatory control over technology transfer, data flows, personnel movement, and supply-chain restructuring by companies operating within China, including personal liability for executives and coordinated enforcement across jurisdictions. The article says these measures formalise and extend China's broader strategy of retaining global manufacturing ecosystems within its regulatory reach, while India's electronics, semiconductor, and supply-chain diversification plans remain vulnerable to resulting compliance friction, rules-of-origin scrutiny, and supply-chain disruption. It further stresses the need for stronger customs compliance, dual-use export controls, trusted-trader recognition, and domestic capacity in critical materials and components. (AI Summary)
Date 23 May 2026
Like1Bookmark
Section 74 drawback and SEZ clearances demand physical export out of India; DTA-to-SEZ transfers do not qualify.
Section 74 drawback applies to goods cleared from a Special Economic Zone to the Domestic Tariff Area on payment of customs duty because that movement is treated as an import. The clarification correctly resolves the import-side issue, but it does not address the separate requirement of re-export under Section 74. For that purpose, export means taking goods out of India to a place outside India, and the Section 74 drawback rules do not extend that meaning to DTA-to-SEZ supplies. (AI Summary)
Date 07 May 2026
Like0Bookmark
Digital justice: ensure AI assistance, privacy safeguards, and inclusive access so technology protects constitutional rights.
Digital transformation of India's courts combines e filing, virtual hearings, AI tools (SUPACE, SUVAS) and multilingual access with the DPDPA's privacy regime, but it creates constitutionally significant risks: algorithmic bias, fabricated AI outputs, concentrated sensitive data, and a rural digital divide. Effective governance requires mandatory independent AI audits, transparent training data disclosure, human verification of outputs, court specific encryption and data protocols, clarified DPDPA application favouring litigant protection, expansion of e Sewa Kendras, multilingual and hybrid access models, and capacity for the Data Protection Board. (AI Summary)
Date 05 Mar 2026
Like0Bookmark
India's cross-border trade rules now allow exporters 15 months to realise payments with unified EDF reporting and bank verification.
The 2026 Regulations establish a principle based, transaction focused regime replacing fragmented exports/imports rules. Key operatives: export realisation timelines (15 months generally; 18 months for INR invoices; sale date for overseas warehoused goods), unified Export Declaration Form (EDF) filing options, AD banks empowered to verify genuineness, approve closures/reductions (declaratory closure up to Rs.10 lakh), and permit advances, set offs and temporary investments subject to safeguards and bank SOPs. (AI Summary)
Date 30 Jan 2026
Like1Bookmark
Chocolate-coated wafer classification hinges on ingredients and tariff schedule indentation, affecting duty treatment for industry.
Tariff classification depended on whether the coating met the statutory definition of chocolate, the coating's composition as compound chocolate using vegetable fat, and the tariff schedule's indentation linking the contested description to communion wafers rather than ordinary commercial wafers, with precedent and consistent practice supporting classification under "Other Wafers." (AI Summary)
Date 11 Nov 2025
Like1Bookmark
Advocate-client confidentiality protected; investigators need senior approval and court oversight before summoning or searching lawyers.
No practicing advocate may be summoned merely for representing an accused or giving legal advice except under narrowly defined exceptions in the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam where the communication furthered an illegal act or the advocate witnessed or participated in a crime. Invocation of an exception requires prior written approval from a senior officer, a recorded factual basis, and judicial supervision before examining an advocate's phone, laptop, or documents to protect other clients' confidentiality and prevent fishing expeditions. (AI Summary)
Date 03 Nov 2025
Like0Bookmark
Advance rulings jurisdiction curtailed, creating uncertainty for tariff classification and valuation appeals under the customs framework.
Conflict between Section 28KA and Section 130E(b) has created uncertainty over whether High Courts may fully review advance rulings on tariff classification, valuation and origin. Judicial divergence-one approach permitting broad appellate review under 28KA, another restricting review by deferring classification and valuation issues to the appellate route under 130E(b)-undermines Chapter V B's goal of binding, timely pre import certainty and raises practical barriers for traders who depend on predictable customs treatment. (AI Summary)
Date 15 Oct 2025
Like0Bookmark
TEPA introduces flexible Rules of Origin: multiple proof routes, diagonal cumulation, permissive transit, and fixed verification timelines.
TEPA's Rules of Origin create a flexible framework allowing four co existing proof mechanisms, diagonal cumulation with EFTA states and India, acceptance of third party invoicing where non manipulation is shown, permissive transit/warehousing through non parties with simple evidence, inventory accounting in lieu of physical segregation for fungible materials, product specific "melt and pour" requirements for steel, optional FOB valuation with a 5% VNM adjustment, and time bound verification SLAs with denial and appeal processes. (AI Summary)
Date 03 Oct 2025
Like1Bookmark
Time-bound provisional assessment regime: mandatory finalisation within fixed term increases predictability and reduces disputes for trade.
CBIC's 2025 regulations convert provisional assessments into a structured, time-bound process with a two-year cap (plus a possible recorded one-year extension), detailed timelines for notifications, submissions, and enquiries, a three-month core finalisation window, and reset rules for legacy cases from March 29, 2025. The regime governs voluntary payments, interest treatment, refunds, bond and security closures, and recovery mechanisms, requires speaking orders where final assessments vary from provisional ones, and mandates written explanations when exceptions suspend timelines. (AI Summary)
Date 22 Sep 2025
Like0Bookmark
Authorized Economic Operator expansion for MSMEs streamlines customs benefits while strengthening environmental and integrity requirements across supply chains.
FoS 2025 requires customs and traders to coordinate environmental compliance and risk management, expands tailored Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) access for MSMEs with simplified procedures and expedited benefits, and mandates an institutionalised ethics and integrity framework alongside measures to counter insider threats, increasing short term compliance costs while aiming to strengthen long term supply chain trust, market access and sustainable trade facilitation. (AI Summary)
Date 18 Sep 2025
Like1Bookmark
Rule 96(10) repeal ends ongoing proceedings under the rule, restoring exporters' eligibility for IGST refunds.
The repeal of Rule 96(10) removes its operative force and, absent an express savings clause in the repeal notification, pending show cause notices, adjudications and appeals founded solely on that rule cease; finally concluded matters remain unaffected, and general saving provisions applicable to primary legislation do not revive proceedings based on a delegated rule. (AI Summary)
Date 15 Sep 2025
Like0Bookmark
Single All-India Electronic Bond streamlines customs obligations nationwide via digital e-stamp, e-sign and bank-linking for traders.
The Single All-India Multipurpose Electronic Bond (SEB) is a nationwide, reusable electronic bond executed digitally via NeSL with e-stamp and e-signature, enabling e-BG linking through ICEGATE and covering obligations under advance authorisation schemes, DFIA and EPCG, warehousing provisions, MOOWR manufacturing, and provisional assessments, while allowing amendment, tracking, and reuse across ports and schemes. (AI Summary)
Date 02 Aug 2025
Like0Bookmark
Doctrine Against Retrospective Taxation blocks retrospective IGST on re imported aircraft parts and preserves input tax credit position.
The Supreme Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, holding that IGST could not be imposed retrospectively via a 2021 notification where the 2017 customs notification did not clearly include IGST. The Court applied the Doctrine Against Retrospective Taxation, ruled ambiguities must be construed in favour of the taxpayer, and identified the practical risk that retrospective IGST levies on re imported aircraft parts would disrupt Input Tax Credit entitlement and create valuation mismatches between customs and GST treatments. (AI Summary)
Date 22 Jul 2025
Replies 1 Reply
Like0Bookmark
Royalty relatedness principle: post manufacture royalties tied to domestic sales are not added to customs transaction value absent contractual nexus.
Whether running royalties on net domestic sales must be added to the customs transaction value depends on two cumulative requirements: the payment must be related to the imported goods and must be a condition of sale of those goods. A royalty based on post manufacture sales that is not contractually tied to importation or to purchasing specific imported inputs is a fee for technology access and does not satisfy the necessary nexus for addition to transaction value. (AI Summary)
Date 18 Jun 2025
Like0Bookmark
Irradiation compliance: documentation errors can trigger destruction or re-export of perishables under U.S. import rules.
Irradiation certification and accurate PPQ Form 203 completion are preconditions for U.S. mango import release; documentary discrepancies permit detention and, if unresolved, mandate destruction or re export at the importer's expense, turning certification errors into immediate enforcement actions for perishables. (AI Summary)
Date 21 May 2025
Like0Bookmark
Mode of Export of Services reporting now required on eBRCs to align services trade data with international standards and policy use.
DGFT requires exporters to self-declare the Mode of Export of Services (Mode 1/2/3/4) on eBRCs to align India's services trade reporting with GATS definitions, supported by domestic foreign trade and FEMA regulations; the operational mechanism and guidance are issued via DGFT notifications and eBRC user manuals, with the objective of producing granular mode-wise data for FTA negotiation leverage, targeted policy incentives, and streamlined compliance. (AI Summary)
Date 23 Apr 2025
Replies 1 Reply
Like0Bookmark
Taxation without law: retrospective interest and penalties cannot be imposed without explicit statutory authority.
The pre-import sequencing requirement made import-before-export a condition for IGST exemption, but imposition of retrospective interest, penalties or confiscation requires explicit statutory authority. Article 265 principles and precedent prevent reading retrospective fiscal powers into law; executive circulars cannot create liabilities absent legislative empowerment. Procedural timing mismatches do not constitute fraud warranting confiscation without evidence of intent or misuse. (AI Summary)
Date 12 Apr 2025
Like0Bookmark
De minimis exemption removal shifts duty liability to carriers and postal services, transforming cross border e commerce compliance.
The United States has ended duty free treatment under the de minimis exemption for low value shipments from China and Hong Kong, imposing full tariffs and penalty tariffs while assigning duty collection and customs compliance responsibilities to carriers and the postal service. The move is justified by enforcement concerns (including narcotics and customs data gaps) and competitive fairness, and it disrupts direct to consumer China e commerce models. India can face reassessment of its own de minimis treatment but may gain export opportunities if it invests in near market inventory, harmonised digital declarations, and stronger postal and courier clearance systems. (AI Summary)
Date 08 Apr 2025
Like0Bookmark
Post-export conversion of shipping bills now permits digital switching to instrument-based export schemes with coordinated approvals.
A statutory and digital framework now permits post-export conversion of incentive-linked shipping bills from drawback to instrument-based schemes, grounded in amendments to Section 149 and enacted by CBIC regulations and a circular. The mechanism covers shipping, postal and baggage exports when incentives are claimed, requires reversal of original benefits to avoid double recovery, prescribes timelines with extension routes and approval levels for specific amendments, and mandates online filing and processing via ICEGATE/EDI with automated data sharing and a Post EGM Module for manifest updates. (AI Summary)
Date 05 Apr 2025
Like0Bookmark
Proof of Origin requirement strengthens origin verification, exposing importers to broader documentation demands and possible duty denial.
The amendment to Section 28DA replaces Certificate of Origin with Proof of Origin, allowing Customs to demand invoices, production records, cost sheets and other supporting documents beyond a certificate to verify FTA origin claims. The evidential burden shifts to importers: a certificate alone no longer conclusively establishes entitlement to preferential duty; failure to provide satisfactory supporting documentation can lead to denial of preferential rates, full duty assessment and penalties. Importers must secure detailed supplier documentation and be prepared for heightened Customs scrutiny and potential delays. (AI Summary)
Date 21 Mar 2025
DrJoshua Ebenezer
Organization
Organization

NuCov Facili Trade

Connected
Connected

October 2022