Relevance of explanatory facts permits contextual evidence needed to clarify material conduct, transactions, identity, timing, relationships, or inferences. Section 9 treats facts as relevant only where necessary to explain or introduce a fact in issue or relevant fact, support or rebut an inference, establish ... Summary
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Relevance of explanatory facts permits contextual evidence needed to clarify material conduct, transactions, identity, timing, relationships, or inferences.
Section 9 treats facts as relevant only where necessary to explain or introduce a fact in issue or relevant fact, support or rebut an inference, establish identity, fix time or place, or show parties' relationship. Contextual evidence is limited to those purposes. Illustrations recognise facts and statements explaining conduct or a transaction, while excluding unrelated dispute particulars and unnecessary business details.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.