Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

Income Tax and GST Professional with a primary focus on GST litigation, advisory, and compliance. Experienced in handling notices, departmental proceedings, drafting replies, assessment matters, and representing clients in indirect tax disputes. Skilled in analysing legal issues and delivering practical, business-oriented tax solutions.

Showing 1 to 3 of 3 Results
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 120927
Dear experts, i am facing a problem in cross utilisation of ITC. The scenario is that tax payable under IGST, CGST & SGST is 5,15,361, 2,19,180 ... Read Full Issue
Date 20 May 2026
Replies 11 Replies
Views 1750 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 120918
Respected experts, I have a query. I am getting my GST cancelled. I have the opening balance in the march of 1.8Lakh approx.; but my GST was blocked ... Read Full Issue
Date 14 May 2026
Replies 4 Replies
Views 562 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 120880
I purchased a capital goods (machine) to make exempted good and didn't avail ITC also. Now I wants to sell the machine in scrap. How should I ... Read Full Issue
Date 21 Apr 2026
Replies 6 Replies
Views 1389 Views
0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 Results
Like0Bookmark
Damages and toleration of act under GST are distinguished from taxable supply in arbitral settlement payments.
GST treatment of damages paid under an arbitral award and settlement terms was considered under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, on the question whether compensation for breach and suspension of enforcement proceedings could be treated as consideration for a taxable service. The analysis stresses that arbitral damages are compensatory, that a crystallised liability under an award is not converted into consideration for a service by consent terms, and that CBIC circulars distinguish breach-related compensation from a separate agreement to tolerate an act or situation. (AI Summary)
Date 20 May 2026
Gourav Ravi Garg
Organization
Organization

Office of Advocate Ravi Bhushan Garg

Connected
Connected

December 2025