Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
User

Hello, I’m a Chartered Accountant with over five years of practical experience in Indirect Taxation. I am currently working as Deputy Manager – Indirect Taxation at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP. I am keen to share the insights and perspectives gained through hands-on implementation and real-world experience in the indirect tax domain. Looking forward to contributing more and learning along the way.

0 Records Found

No issues posted by the user yet!

0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 3 of 3 Results
Like1Bookmark
Doctrine of mutuality and GST on member contributions reexamined through constitutional limits on statutory deeming fictions.
The doctrine of mutuality has long governed the tax treatment of transactions between associations and their members, because a person cannot make a taxable supply to oneself. Before GST, the Supreme Court held that member contributions to clubs or associations lacking an independent commercial character were not taxable, and that mutuality survived the Forty-Sixth Constitutional Amendment except for goods expressly deemed to be sales. Under GST, Section 7(1)(aa) sought to deem member transactions as supplies and override mutuality for welfare funds and member-benefit arrangements. (AI Summary)
Author
Date 12 May 2026
Replies 1 Reply
Like0Bookmark
Advance Authorizations: Once DGFT issues EODC for regularised shortfalls, Customs cannot challenge export obligation fulfilment or deny benefits.
Once DGFT accepts regularisation of export shortfalls and issues an Export Obligation Discharge Certificate, the EODC constitutes conclusive proof of export obligation fulfilment and redeems the Advance Authorization; Customs authorities lack jurisdiction to re-open or dispute the DGFT's determination, and inconsistent positions by separate government wings on the same Foreign Trade Policy determination are impermissible. (AI Summary)
Author
Date 02 Feb 2026
Like1Bookmark
Export of used capital goods: reversal of input tax credit may be required under Section 18(6) despite zero-rating.
The document explains that export of capital goods on which ITC was availed triggers mandatory reversal under Section 18(6), requiring payment of the higher of ITC attributable to remaining useful life or tax on transaction value; export qualifies as "supply," so reversal applies even under LUT. It highlights an unresolved choice of calculation method between differing rules and states that zero-rating under Section 16 does not expressly override the reversal obligation, creating interpretational uncertainty. (AI Summary)
Author
Date 02 Dec 2025
Sabareesun B
Organization
Organization

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP

Connected
Connected

November 2025