Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
User

About Section not updated!

0 Records Found

No issues posted by the user yet!

0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 Results
Like0Bookmark
Corporate Social Responsibility compliance requires mandated profit-based spending, governance duties, and a new CSR reporting obligation.
Section 135 requires companies meeting specified net worth, turnover, or net profit thresholds to spend at least two percent of the average net profits of the three preceding financial years on activities in Schedule VII, governed by the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules. Governance requires a board-level CSR Committee to formulate policy, recommend expenditure, and monitor implementation, while the board must ensure implementation, disclose the policy, report utilization, and account for any unspent amounts. The rules exclude ordinary business activities and set implementation modes, mandatory registration for implementing agencies, and introduce E Form CSR 2 for reporting; statutory penalties apply for noncompliance. (AI Summary)
Author
Date 14 Jun 2022
Like0Bookmark
Substance over form principle affirmed, permitting inquiry into economic reality to determine tax character of transactions.
The note explains the substance over form doctrine as allowing tax authorities to disregard contractual nomenclature and assess the commercial reality of transactions where factual and documentary evidence demonstrates a sham or tax-avoidance purpose; it traces divergent judicial approaches, outlines GAAR as a statutory codification permitting disregard of form for impermissible avoidance arrangements lacking commercial substance, and highlights recent authority endorsing holistic, fact-driven "look at" inquiries in indirect-tax disputes while stressing the need for threshold proof of abuse and procedural safeguards. (AI Summary)
Author
Date 13 Jun 2022
Palak Rawat
Organization
Organization

Damodaram Sanjivyya National Law University

Connected
Connected

June 2022