Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

GST Litigations, Representations, Contract Review, Refund, Compliance Review, Appeals

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 Results
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 119295
I kindly request all the respected experts associated with the Tax management, and all the fellow members, please reply to the querry on factual ... Read Full Issue
Date 09 Sep 2024
Replies 3 Replies
Views 3158 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116204
Whether Partners Share of Profit liable to GST? Whether share of profit would faill within the ambit of salary just like the Commission paid to ... Read Full Issue
Date 14 Apr 2020
Replies 5 Replies
Views 16093 Views
30 Replies on 27 Issues
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116301
I am filing my RFD-01. The only sales i have are zero rated export sale and exempted Meis scrip sale. My query is that do i include the MEIS ... Read Full Issue
Date 19 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 6069 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116296
Dear Friends..We are an DTA pharma export company based in bangalore, we billed some of the products to an SEZ organisation in bangalore.Can we claim ... Read Full Issue
Author
Date 18 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 4983 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116286
Section 122(1)(vii) provides for penalty for taking the ITC. Section 122(2) also provides for penalty for wrong availment of ITC. Under which ... Read Full Issue
Date 11 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 11488 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116285
Dear Sir,We used to send Auto/Tempo to pickup Materials from Transporters like Mahalingesh, Patel Roadways, TCI, VRL Etc. Driver will pickup the ... Read Full Issue
Date 11 May 2020
Replies 2 Replies
Views 27744 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116282
Dear readers,Like to know the Legal recourse available to the Landlord from GST standpoint on the unrealised Rent and Time of supply of services.It ... Read Full Issue
Date 09 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 4178 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116277
Dear Sir, whether interest rate @24% mentioned u/s 50(3) is applicable on reversal of any excess claimed ITC or we need to pay @18% only ... Read Full Issue
Date 07 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 10346 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116270
Respected membersI am new to export. Want to sell on ebay.comAs product value is small as compared to shipping charge on export itemThe gst charged ... Read Full Issue
Date 06 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 4576 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116269
SirAs I check in icegate for igst validation for my shipping bills, but it shows that 'No record found' for given input. Kindly help me out ... Read Full Issue
Author
Date 05 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 5857 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116267
Suppose a company is receiving donations from its employees/staff in lieu of COVID-19 and these proceeds are utilized to provide food and other ... Read Full Issue
Author
Date 04 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 13721 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116262
XYZ (Goods Transport Agency) is registered with GST and is providing GTA services to PQR (Goods Transport Agency) who is not registered with GST. Is ... Read Full Issue
Date 03 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 2750 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116256
Dear Sir,A company is into tour operating services. They are providing services on both principal & agent module1. On principal module charging ... Read Full Issue
Date 01 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 12061 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116253
Dear Sir,Please clear what will be "Relevant Date" in case of Refund for tax paid in wrong head CGST/SGST instead of IGST & Vice-Versa? ... Read Full Issue
Date 01 May 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 8412 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116233
There are following 2 queries from my end. 1. Whether GST RCM would be applicable on FSI paid to Local Authority as per Entry -4 of ... Read Full Issue
Date 25 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 3681 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116204
Whether Partners Share of Profit liable to GST? Whether share of profit would faill within the ambit of salary just like the Commission paid to ... Read Full Issue
Date 14 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 16093 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116203
In recent AAR issued by Rajasthan, GST on director remuneration by whatever name called has to be discharged under RCM of GST Law. I know there ... Read Full Issue
Date 13 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 17237 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116194
Dear experts, I would like to have some clarification on subject as to whether GST reverse charge is applicable on development fees, amenities ... Read Full Issue
Date 11 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 19378 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116187
Is remunerations paid to Directors is liable to RCM??
Date 08 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 4494 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116180
In FY 2018-19, a person has wrongly claimed CGST and SGST of ₹ 30,000 each instead of claiming IGST of ₹ 60,000. No correction made in ... Read Full Issue
Date 03 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 29012 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116179
We have a manufacturing unit at Haridwar which is under tax holiday exemption under income tax (hence domestic transfer pricing rules also ... Read Full Issue
Date 02 Apr 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 1280 Views
Like0Bookmark
Issue Id: 116171
SirRecently GST audit for 2017-18 was conducted by the department and they have raised a demand of approx 10 lac under CGST and SGST due to excess ... Read Full Issue
Date 30 Mar 2020
Replies 1 Reply
Views 3926 Views
Showing 1 to 20 of 51 Results
Like0Bookmark
Abuse of process where IPC Section 174 proceedings proceed despite compliance with CGST summons procedure.
Proceedings under the Indian Penal Code provision for inquiry into unattended deaths are an abuse of process when summons issued under the CGST Act have been replied to or otherwise entertained; summons under the CGST Act follow Civil Procedure Code procedure and the CGST statutory scheme prescribes limited administrative penalties and specific penal provisions, so initiating general criminal inquiry in place of statutory remedies is improper. (AI Summary)
Date 14 Oct 2023
Like0Bookmark
Refund limitation inapplicable where tax was not chargeable and deposit made under mistake of law.
When tax is not chargeable, an amount deposited as GST by a supplier under a mistaken belief cannot be retained by authorities; the ordinary burden of indirect tax rests with the recipient but does not convert an unlawful payment into a valid levy. The limitation period under Section 54 for refund applications does not apply where the deposit resulted from a mistake of law and the tax was not legally chargeable. (AI Summary)
Date 11 Oct 2023
Like0Bookmark
Right to written grounds of arrest ensures transparency and limits arrest for mere non cooperation during interrogation.
A person arrested under the Act of 2002 must be informed of the grounds of arrest so as to enable effective defence and bail applications; this includes furnishing a written copy of the grounds as a matter of course. The Enforcement Directorate must exercise its wide powers transparently and fairly, and non cooperation or refusal to admit guilt cannot alone justify arrest. (AI Summary)
Date 10 Oct 2023
Like0Bookmark
Rectification under Section 39(9) restricts post period GSTR 1 corrections that alter recipients' input tax credit records.
Rectification of GSTR 1 entries is limited by a statutory time bar intended to protect the integrity of electronic tax records and the input tax credit position of third parties; allowing corrections beyond that period would retroactively alter other taxpayers' GSTR 2A reconciliations and produce cascading effects, so post period rectifications that disturb settled electronic entries are barred to preserve administrative certainty. (AI Summary)
Date 10 Nov 2022
Like0Bookmark
Interest on wrongly availed Input Tax Credit arises only upon utilisation; interest computation tied to electronic ledger utilisation.
Suspension of registration for non-filing under Rule 21A(2A) is deemed revoked upon filing all pending returns unless already cancelled; Rule 43 exempts Duty Credit Scrips from ITC reversal under Rule 42; Rule 86(4B) requires re credit to the electronic credit ledger where erroneous refunds deposited via DRC-03 were debited from the electronic cash ledger; UPI and IMPS are recognized payment modes and FORM GST PMT-09 permits transfer of electronic cash ledger balances to a distinct person absent unpaid liabilities; Rule 88B prescribes interest computation for late returns, other unpaid tax, and wrongly availed and utilised ITC based on electronic ledger utilisation rules. (AI Summary)
Date 12 Jul 2022
Like0Bookmark
Right to livelihood impacted by strict appeal limitation on GST registration cancellations, risking denial of ability to earn.
Strict limitation on appellate review of GST registration cancellations can deprive professionals of the ability to bill, obtain work, and earn a livelihood; cancellation for procedural default without effective remedy results in practical starvation risks and denial of subsistence. Application of judicial discretion and practical wisdom is necessary to avoid disproportionate consequences where procedural bars render a remedy illusory and significantly impact a person's right to life and livelihood. (AI Summary)
Date 08 Jul 2022
Like0Bookmark
Show cause notice lacking material particulars violates natural justice, invalidating cancellation based on undisclosed investigative facts.
Show cause notice that only recites rule-based grounds without stating the material particulars by which the authority concluded registration was obtained through fraud or suppression is not tenable. Cancellation based on investigative material not disclosed in the notice breaches principles of natural justice by depriving the registrant of a reasonable opportunity to respond, making the action legally infirm. (AI Summary)
Date 07 Jul 2022
Like0Bookmark
GST rate changes revise sectoral rates and withdraw exemptions, altering compliance, refund processing and taxpayer obligations for taxpayers
Proposed GST Council measures include sectoral rate revisions and selective withdrawal or narrowing of exemptions across industries, procedural amendments to expedite and control IGST refunds and re crediting, limitation period relief for a pandemic interval, substitution of interest liability to apply only upon utilization of wrongly availed credit, transferability of cash ledger balances between distinct persons, and multiple compliance and return filing relaxations and clarifications including automated revocation of suspension and e commerce registration relief. (AI Summary)
Date 07 Jul 2022
Like0Bookmark
Reporting error in GST returns cannot bar export refund where exports occurred and IGST was paid.
Reporting exports in the wrong GSTR-3B table is a technical misclassification that should not defeat entitlement to export incentives; where exports occurred and IGST was validly paid, procedural requirements under the CGST Rules must not be applied so rigidly as to deny refund claims. Authorities are required to verify invoices and transmit/consult GSTN and customs records and proceed to process refund claims based on substantive compliance rather than technical reporting errors. (AI Summary)
Date 26 May 2022
Like0Bookmark
Tolerating an Act: statutory compensation for cancelled allotments not treated as taxable consideration under service tax law
Compensation paid by a subsequent allottee to a prior allottee for investment in land and mine infrastructure is not consideration for tolerating an act because the prior allottee had no voluntary choice to tolerate cancellation, no agreement to tolerate for consideration, and both cancellation and payment arose by operation of law; statutory reimbursement therefore falls outside the taxable concept of tolerating an act under service tax. (AI Summary)
Date 12 May 2022
Like0Bookmark
Penalty for breach of contract not treated as consideration for services and therefore not subject to service tax.
Liquidated damages or penalty payments recovered for failure to achieve the Minimum Guarantee Tonnage under a port services agreement are not consideration for a taxable service. The penal clause compensates the port for loss and deters breaches, has no nexus with the taxable service rendered, and thus amounts recovered as compensation for breach do not form part of the taxable value or constitute consideration for service tax purposes. (AI Summary)
Date 11 May 2022
Like0Bookmark
Tax collection without statutory authority infringes constitutional protection against deprivation of property and warrants refund.
Tax collected under coercive circumstances during an investigation lacks statutory authority and infringes constitutional protection against deprivation of property; where a sole statutory provision permits deposits during investigation, its conditions must be satisfied, and absent that compliance coerced deposits are unlawful and subject to refund. Statutory powers to collect or retain funds must be exercised reasonably, in good faith, and for the purpose conferred, with procedural safeguards to prevent arbitrary deprivation. (AI Summary)
Date 17 Mar 2022
Like0Bookmark
Duty to consider objections: assessing officer must address each objection, supply relied documents and grant personal hearing.
Assessing Officer must meaningfully address each submission in objections to a reopening notice, provide reasoned conclusions, and supply copies of documents relied upon when requested; reopening is a quasi judicial function requiring a personal hearing with adequate notice, disclosure of relied judgments or reports with the hearing notice, and production or redaction of referenced documents to permit effective response. (AI Summary)
Date 02 Mar 2022
Like0Bookmark
Transitional credit does not create a refund right; refund preserved only where pre-existing entitlement exists and double recovery barred.
Transitional credit does not create a new right to claim refund; transitional provisions preserve existing entitlements and prescribe refund modalities without reviving extinguished rights or creating fresh ones. The refund proviso prevents double recovery by barring simultaneous retention of transitional credit and refund for the same tax. Input services received after the appointed day qualify only where the supplier paid tax under the prior law and the recipient records invoices within the prescribed post-appointed-day period. (AI Summary)
Date 25 Feb 2022
Like0Bookmark
Blocking of credit ledger cannot produce a negative balance; recovery must proceed under remedial recovery proceedings.
Power under Rule 86A to disallow debits from the electronic credit ledger is limited to an amount equivalent to the credit alleged to be fraudulently availed and cannot create a negative balance; it is a provisional restriction, not a vehicle for permanent recovery, which must be pursued through remedial recovery proceedings. Cross-utilisation between tax heads may only be blocked where legally permissible, and negative blocks must be withdrawn. (AI Summary)
Date 24 Feb 2022
Like0Bookmark
Residential accommodation exemption covers hostel lodging for students and working professionals, qualifying such services for GST exemption.
Services providing long-term hostel accommodation to students and working professionals qualify as residential accommodation for the GST exemption; ordinary meaning and Board clarifications distinguishing residential dwellings from temporary-stay establishments control classification, and the provider's commercial registration status does not affect exemption eligibility. (AI Summary)
Date 21 Feb 2022
Replies 1 Reply
Like0Bookmark
Excessive pre-trial detention can justify conditional release when custody approaches the statutory maximum sentence.
Court examined continued pre-trial detention where the accused had undergone custodial incarceration amounting to a substantial portion of the statutory maximum sentence, observed that such custodial duration undermines justification for indefinite detention, noted the investigation remained pending and respondents' allegations of habitual offending and large-scale evasion, and directed that release under appropriate conditions be considered by the trial court to protect the investigatory process and ensure compliance. (AI Summary)
Date 19 Feb 2022
Like0Bookmark
Technical glitches must not bar GST registration benefits; administrative orders must be implemented and benefits granted.
The court directed the respondent to implement the Appellate Authority's order and grant all consequential benefits for the interregnum period, emphasising that technical glitches are within GSTN control and must not prevent a registered dealer from availing benefits arising from a favourable appellate decision. (AI Summary)
Date 18 Feb 2022
Like0Bookmark
Blocking of ITC requires recorded reasons, objective material, independent satisfaction and prompt hearing to prevent arbitrary freezes.
Blocking of input tax credit under Rule 86A must be exercised only after an officer forms subjective satisfaction based on objective material, records reasons before blocking, specifies the precise ITC amount alleged to be fraudulently or wrongly availed, and provides a prompt hearing; the power is administrative with quasi judicial shades, distinct from Section 83, delegable to subordinate officers but subject to reasonableness and independent application of mind. (AI Summary)
Date 16 Feb 2022
Like0Bookmark
Interest on electronic cash ledger payments limited to ledger debited amounts, with staggered relief and filing extensions implemented.
Interest on tax paid from the electronic cash ledger is made retrospectively applicable, with interest on delayed returns confined to amounts debited from that ledger. Notifications further extend GSTR 1 filing dates for specified months, prescribe staggered interest relief tied to turnover bands for delayed electronic cash ledger payments, reduce late fees across GSTR 3B, GSTR 1, GSTR 4 and GSTR 7 subject to turnover and nil liability categories, exempt government entities from e invoice rules, extend many compliance time limits (with listed exceptions), and allow temporary EVC filing and cumulative ITC adjustment limits when supplier details are missing. (AI Summary)
Date 08 Jun 2021
Replies 1 Reply
Rachit Agarwal
Organization
Organization

G F R CAPITAL ADVISORS LLP

Connected
Connected

October 2018