Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Assessing Officer cannot use Pick and Choose Method while disposing off the Objection which has been raised by Petitioner against the Administrative Order

Rachit Agarwal
Assessing Officers Must Address All Objections, Provide Documents, and Allow Hearings in Section 148 Tax Cases. The Bombay High Court ruled that the Assessing Officer cannot selectively address objections raised by a petitioner against an administrative order. The petitioner had received a notice under Section 148 and objected, but the Assessing Officer dismissed these objections without providing requested documents. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer must consider all submissions and provide necessary documents, as reopening assessments is a quasi-judicial function. The officer must also grant a personal hearing with adequate notice and provide references to any relevant judgments or documents. The decision is significant for handling objections in tax proceedings. (AI Summary)

2022 (2) TMI 1093 - Bombay High Court in Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1 (3) (1) and Ors.

Brief Facts

  1. Petitioner received a notice dated 30th March, 2021 under Section 148
  2. Petitioner filed its objections to the said notice
  3. In the objections to the re-opening, petitioner raised various points including the fact
  4. The Assessing Officer instead of providing these documents simply dismissed petitioner’s request by saying it is purely an administrative matter and all correspondence have been made through system

Hon'ble Court Observations and Order

  1. The Assessing Officer was duty bound to deal with all the submissions made by petitioner in its objections and not just brush aside uncomfortable objections under the carpet
  2. Assessing Officer to provide photocopies of documents evidencing request sent by the Assessing Officer to the Principal Chief Commissioner
  3. The Assessing Officer was duty bound to provide all the documents called for by petitioner and his reluctance to provide these documents only would make the court draw adverse inference against respondent
  4. re-opening of assessment is not a mechanical ritual but a quasi judicial function
  5. He shall also grant a personal hearing to petitioner and the notice of personal hearing shall be communicated atleast seven working days in advance
  6. The Assessing Officer shall deal with all previous submissions while considering the assessee’s objections, deal with each objections and give proper reasons for its conclusion
  7. If the reasons make reference to any other document or a letter or a report, such document or letter or report should be enclosed to the reasons. Such portion as it does not bear reference to the assessee concerned could be redacted
  8. If the Assessing Officer is going to rely on any judgment/order of any Tribunal or Court reference/ citation of these judgment/orders shall be provided alongwith notice for personal hearing so that the assessee will be able to deal with/distinguish these judgments/ orders.  

Comments

This Order would be useful in the following Proceedings

  1. Disposal of Objections filed against the Reasons for issuing Notice u/s 148
  2. Disposal of Objections against the reasons for issue of order under Rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017
  3. Disposal of Objections against the reasons for issue of order under Section 83- Provisional Attachment of Bank Account
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles