Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

SCN containing the merely the GST Rules without referring the Material Particulars relied upon is not tenable in eyes of law, SCN/ Order set aside

Rachit Agarwal
Court Overturns GST Registration Cancellation; SCN Lacked Specifics, Violating Natural Justice Principles. The Gujarat High Court set aside a show cause notice (SCN) and subsequent order for cancellation of registration issued to a business entity under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework. The court found the SCN legally untenable as it lacked material particulars necessary for a proper response, merely incorporating grounds from the GST Rules without specific allegations. The order for cancellation relied on new material not included in the SCN, violating principles of natural justice by depriving the entity of a fair opportunity to address the allegations. The court deemed the authority's actions illegal, necessitating intervention. (AI Summary)

SREEJITH K. PROP. OF M/S SRIDEV TRADERS VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT - 2022 (7) TMI 127 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Hon’ble Court Observation on Facts of Show Cause Notice

  1. Show cause notice is not tenable in eye of law inasmuch as the same is found without any material particulars, which a prudent person would be able to respond.
  2. Upon bare perusal of the contents of the show cause notice, we find that the reason recorded by the respondent authority is a mere incorporation of the relevant ground appearing in the Rules framed thereunder.
  3. The show cause notice should have referred to any material particulars as to in what manner the authority has prima facie found that the registration of the writ applicant has been obtained by means of fraud, will ful misstatement or suppression of facts.

Hon’ble Court Observation on Order passed after SCN

  1. Upon perusal of the order for cancellation of registration passed by the respondent Authority, it refers to the initiation of proceedings under Section 67(2) of the GGST Act, 2017 in respect of M/s. Sridev Traders, Rajkot.
  2. Respondent Authority while passing the said order of cancellation of registration had referred to and relied upon the letter dated 14.12.2021 addressed by the State Tax Officer(1), Enforcement, Division-9, Bhavnagar with regard to the investigation proceedings.
  3. The respondent Authority has proceeded to pass the order for cancellation of registration on new material or facts which were neither formed part of the show cause notice nor the same were disclosed to the writ applicant.
  4. The aforesaid action of the respondent authority is in breach of violation of principles of natural justice.
  5. The writ applicant has been deprived of the reasonable opportunity without putting to their notice about such allegations, more particularly when the cancellation of registration under the GGST Act results into civil and criminal action.

Thus, we find that the respondent authority has failed to adhere to the basic principles of natural justice and such action of the respondent authority is illegal and is required to be interfered with.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles