Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
Filter Across TMI ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • DTAA
  • Benami Property
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • SION
  • SEZ
  • FEMA
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI
  • IBC
  • Law of Competition
  • LLP
  • Partnership Firms
  • Trust and Society
  • Money Laundering
  • Labour laws
  • Bharatiya Nyaya
  • Indian Laws
  • F. Acts / Amendment Acts
  • Bills
  • Wealth-tax
  • Service Tax
  • Cenvat Credit
  • Central Excise
  • Central Sales Tax
  • VAT - Delhi
Category:
---- All Categories ---- ❯
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Case Laws
  • Acts / Rules
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Forms - Annexure
  • Tariff / Classification
  • Duty Drawback
  • Schedules / SION
  • Discussion Forum
  • Highlights
  • Articles
  • Manuals / Reckoners
  • News / Feed
  • Short Notes
  • TMI Info
From Date:
To Date:
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Search Across Website
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Section 53A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
^1[53A. . - In a prosecution for an offence under section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, ^2[section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB] or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or for attempt to commit any such offence, where the question of consent is in issue, evidence of the character of the victim or of such person's previous sexual experience with any person shall not be relevant... ... ...

Section 53 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
53. . - In criminal proceedings, the fact that the person accused is of a good character, is relevant. =============... ... ...

Section 52 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
CHARACTER WHEN RELEVANT 52. . - In civil cases, the fact that the character of any person concerned is such as to render probable or improbable any conduct imputed to him, is irrelevant, except in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant. =============... ... ...

Section 51 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
51. . - Whenever the opinion of any living person is relevant, the grounds on which such opinion is based are also relevant. Illustration An expert may give an account of experiments performed by him for the purpose of forming his opinion. =============... ... ...

Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
50. . - When the Court has to form an opinion as to the relationship of one person to another, the opinion, expressed by conduct, as to the existence of such relationship, of any person who, as a member of the family or otherwise, has special means of knowledge on the subject, is a relevant fact: Provided that such opinion shall not be sufficient to prove a marriage in proceedings under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (4 of 1869), or in prosecutions under section 494, 495, 497 or 498 of the Indi... ... ...

Section 49 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
49. . - When the Court has to form an opinion as to- the usages and tenets of any body of men or family, the constitution and government of any religious or charitable foundation, or the meaning of words or terms used in particular districts or by particular classes of people, the opinions of persons having special means of knowledge thereon are, relevant facts. =============... ... ...

Section 48 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
48. . - When the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any general custom or right, the opinions, as to the existence of such custom or right, of persons who would be likely to know of its existence if it existed, are relevant. Explanation. - The expression "general custom or right" includes customs or rights common to any considerable class of persons. Illustration The right of the villagers of a particular village to use the water of a particular well is a general right ... ... ...

Section 47A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
^1[47A. . - When the Court has to form an opinion as to the ^2[electronic signature of any person, the opinion of the Certifying Authority which has issued the ^3[electronic Signature Certificate] is a relevant fact.]     **************** NOTES:- 1. Ins. by Act 21 of 2000, s. 92 and the Second Schedule (w.e.f. 17-10-2000). 2. Subs. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 52, for "digital signature" (w.e.f. 27-10-2009). 3. Subs. by s 52, ibid., for "Digital Signature Certifi... ... ...

Section 47 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Opinion evidence on handwriting is a relevant fact where authorship or signature of a document is in issue, provided the witness is acquainted with the alleged writer's handwriting. Such acquaintance may result from seeing the person write, receiving purportedly authored replies to communications, or routinely handling purportedly authored documents in ordinary business dealings. Personal observation of the person writing is not essential; correspondents, clerks handling correspondence, and business advisers may offer relevant opinions on authorship.

Section 46 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Facts bearing on expert opinions become relevant, though independently irrelevant, when they support or contradict an expert opinion that is relevant to the issue. Comparative evidence may test the reliability and evidentiary weight of expert conclusions, including evidence of symptoms in other poison-exposure cases or similar harbour conditions bearing on causation of obstruction.

Section 45A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
^1[45A. . - When in a proceeding, the court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to any information transmitted or stored in any computer resource or any other electronic or digital form, the opinion of the Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), is a relevant fact. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section, an Examiner of Electronic Evidence shall be an expert.]     ***************** ... ... ...

Opinions of experts
Act Rules Indian Laws
Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
OPINIONS OF THIRD PERSONS WHEN RELEVANT 45. . - When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law or of science, or art, or as to identity of handwriting ^1[or finger impressions], the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art, ^3[or in questions as to identity of handwriting] ^2[or finger impressions] are relevant facts. Such persons are called experts. Illustrations (a) The question is, whether the death of A was cause... ... ...

Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
44. . - Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section 40, 41 or 42, and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion. =============... ... ...

Section 43 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
43. . - Judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in sections 40, 41 and 42, are irrelevant, unless the existence of such judgment, order or decree is a fact in issue, or is relevant under some other provision of this Act. Illustrations (a) A and B separately sue C for a libel which reflects upon each of them. C in each case says that the matter alleged to be libellous is true, and the circumstances are such that it is probably true in each case, or in neither. A obtains ... ... ...

Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Judgments, orders and decrees concerning matters of a public nature may be relevant to an enquiry even when they do not fall within section 41. Their relevance does not make them conclusive proof of the facts stated. A prior decree concerning an asserted public right of way may therefore be considered in a later trespass dispute, without conclusively establishing the existence of that right.

Section 41 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Final judgments, orders or decrees of competent courts exercising probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction are relevant where they confer, remove or declare a legal character, or declare absolute entitlement to a specific thing. Such adjudications constitute conclusive proof of the legal character or title declared, including the time at which that character accrued or ceased, or the property became vested.

Section 40 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Previous judgments, orders or decrees that legally prevent a court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial are relevant facts. Their existence is relevant when determining whether the court ought to take cognizance of that suit or hold that trial, in relation to a legal bar against a second suit or trial.

2024 (7) TMI 1824
Case Laws Income Tax
-
SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER For the Revenue : Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR For the Assessee : Shri Manish J. Shah & Shri Rushin Patel, A.Rs. ORDER PER : SIDDHARHTA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER :- This is an appeal filed by the Department against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, in proceeding u/s 250 vide order dated 21/12/2023 passed for the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Revenue has raised the f... ... ...

Section 39 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 39 applies the rule of evidentiary completeness when a statement forms part of a longer statement, conversation, document, electronic record, book, or connected correspondence. Evidence may include only the connected material that the Court considers necessary to understand the statement's nature and effect and the circumstances in which it was made. Material exceeding that necessity is excluded.

Section 38 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Foreign-law evidence is relevant where an opinion must be formed on the law of another country. Statements contained in books purporting to be printed or published under that country's Government authority, and reports of rulings contained in books purporting to report them, are relevant for ascertaining that law.

TMI Search

Back

All TMI Search

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Search

Back

All TMI Search

Topics

Acts Income Tax