Advanced Search Options : ❯
Voluntary Health Services, Chennai is approved as an "other institution" for scientific research under the Income-tax Act, 2025, enabling the specified tax treatment for donations. The approval applies for tax years 2026-2027 through 2030-2031, subject to continued Scientific and Industrial Research Organization approval for each relevant year. The institution must comply with prescribed rules, submit an annual donation statement in Form No. 15 by the required deadline, and issue donors Form No. 16 certificates stating the donation amount.
Master Circular consolidates the regulatory framework for debenture trustees and rescinds the earlier master circular while preserving prior actions, rights, liabilities, penalties, proceedings and pending applications. It requires portal-based registration requests and prior approval for change in control, and regulates business transfers, surrender, regulatory communications, and non-regulated activities through ring-fenced separate business units. Trustees must independently conduct security due diligence, issue prescribed certificates, validate charge creation and registration, and continuously monitor security cover, covenants, payments, ratings and defaults through the depository-hosted Security and Covenant Monitoring System. Issuers.....
The standard operating procedure for moving domestic or customs-cleared cargo with EXIM cargo between port terminals and hinterland ICDs/CFSs now extends to Gateway Distriparks Limited. Its operations require separate identification and stacking of domestic and EXIM cargo, pre-advice and train/container details, verification of container and seal particulars, and immediate reporting of discrepancies. Suspected tampering bars further processing without the proper officer's permission and may require full examination. Reworking or repacking requires permission; at least 50% of outbound cargo must be EXIM cargo. Weekly reconciliation, random Customs checks, an indemnity bond and custodian compliance responsibility apply. Violations may trigger action under applicable customs law. The amendment takes immediate effect.
Foreign-currency receivables use LIBOR-based benchmarking, while abated search assessments permit additions without incriminating material.
Outstanding receivables from an overseas associated enterprise require arm's-length interest benchmarking by reference to the enterprise's residence and the currency of the receivable; LIBOR plus 200 basis points is preferred over Indian lending or deposit rates. Remittances substantiated by board and remittance records as investments should not be recharacterised as loans for imputed-interest adjustments. Interest on delayed service-tax payment is compensatory rather than penal and is deductible. Where no return was filed and the notice period remained open on the search date, the assessment is pending and abated, permitting additions without incriminating material.
Section 68 loan-credit evidence supports deletion where lender capacity and genuine banking trail are proven, unlike unsupported sales commission claims.
Unsecured loan credits are not treated as unexplained cash credits where loan confirmations, lender PAN and tax-return records, audited financial statements, ledger accounts and bank statements establish the lender's identity, financial capacity and the genuineness of payments. Funds sourced from fixed-deposit maturity proceeds supported the lender's capacity, resulting in deletion of the loan addition. Sales commission expenditure requires confirmation from recipients and evidence of services rendered. In the absence of such substantiation, the commission disallowance remains, while the taxable computation excludes the unsecured-loan addition.
Concealment penalties fail where reassessment returns are accepted unchanged, despite non-filing of original income-tax returns.
Penalties for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) are unsustainable where returns filed in reassessment proceedings are accepted without additions or modifications. Acceptance of the returned income removes the factual foundation for alleging concealment or inaccurate particulars. On these facts, failure to file original returns does not independently sustain the penalty, and deletion of the penalties follows.
Resident-payee disallowance is limited to the applicable statutory portion, while repeated Labour Welfare Fund adjustments must be excluded.
Payments to resident payees attract disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) only to the applicable 30% extent, rather than the full expenditure amount. Where the assessee has already made a suo motu disallowance at that rate, the computation should be aligned accordingly. Employee Labour Welfare Fund contributions already disallowed in the return cannot be added again in consequential computation, as this would duplicate the same disallowance. Tax computation must apply the disallowance appropriate to the payment type while eliminating duplicate additions.
Statutorily required cooperative deposits qualify for tax deduction, while excess-deposit interest is computed after directly attributable expenses.
Interest earned by a co-operative society on deposits mandated under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act for reserve-fund purposes has a direct nexus with its credit-facility business and qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), subject to verification of the compulsory deposit quantum. Interest from deposits exceeding statutory requirements may be taxable as Income From Other Sources. That interest must be computed on a net basis, allowing proportionate expenditure directly attributable to earning it. Assessment should distinguish compulsory deposits from voluntary or excess investments and apply the corresponding income treatment.
Charitable registration renewal cannot be refused for income-verification issues, requiring scrutiny instead during assessment proceedings.
Renewal of charitable registration under Section 12AB cannot be refused merely because of surplus generation, land-sale profit, unexplained cash deposits, loan advances, or allegedly unsubstantiated expenditure where charitable objects and the genuineness of activities had already been accepted under Section 12AA. These matters concern verification of income and the application of funds, which must be examined during assessment proceedings rather than at the registration stage. Rejection on those grounds was unsustainable, and registration was required to be granted.
Delayed associated-enterprise receivables require transfer-pricing benchmarking, with foreign-currency interest recalculated using a reasonable credit period and benchmark rate.
Delayed realisation of trade receivables from associated enterprises is treated as an independent international transaction because Section 92B includes deferred payments, receivables and business debt. Excess credit must therefore be transfer-pricing benchmarked. For foreign-currency receivables, a 60-day credit period and LIBOR plus 200 basis points apply after verification, requiring any interest adjustment to be recomputed on those parameters.
Reassessment notice requirements raise jurisdictional questions where a return follows a Section 148 notice without Section 143(2) notice.
Jurisdictional validity of reassessment is in issue where a return was filed following a notice under Section 148(1) without a notice under Section 143(2). Clarification is required on the applicability and effect of the provisos to Sections 143(2) and 148(2), including treatment of a return filed after the period specified in the reassessment notice. The matter was listed for further hearing.
Reassessment limitation barred proceedings where statutory notices and consequential orders were issued after the applicable cut-off.
Reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2015-2016 were time-barred where the initial notice, notice under section 148A(b), and consequential reassessment order were issued on or after 1 April 2021. Under the binding interpretation of the relaxation legislation applicable to reassessment, proceedings for that assessment year could not be completed within the prescribed limitation period after that cut-off. The notices and resulting reassessment order were therefore legally unsustainable.
By: - K Balasubramanian
Invocation of Section 74(1) of the CGST Act is confined to cases involving fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts undertaken to evade tax. Non-payment or delayed payment of GST alone is insufficient. Investigations must yield material evidence of the relevant elements, and the show-cause notice must set out that evidence. A notice lacking foundational facts of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression cannot rest merely on delayed tax payment.
By: - DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Section 14 moratorium under the IBC restrains continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor after admission to corporate insolvency resolution process. It does not, without an independent legal basis, shield co-respondents from a consumer complaint. Where liability of those parties remains unresolved, consumer adjudication may continue against them, while objections concerning privity, maintainability, and independent contractual obligations must be determined on their merits.
By: - Bimal jain
GST notice service through the common portal is a recognised method under Section 169, but persistent non-response may require the proper officer to consider another prescribed mode, preferably registered post with acknowledgement due. Competing approaches treat portal-only service differently: one requires further steps where communication appears ineffective, while another regards any statutory mode as sufficient. The issue is linked to the taxpayer's opportunity for a personal hearing before an adverse determination.
By: - Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
GST arrest powers permit the Commissioner to authorise, through a written order, a Central Tax officer to arrest a person only where there is reason to believe that specified offences involving tax evasion, wrongful input tax credit, or wrongful refund have been committed. Arrest is confined to offences meeting the prescribed monetary threshold, while a person previously convicted for a specified offence may be arrested irrespective of the amount involved. The framework treats arrest as an exceptional enforcement measure requiring prior authorisation and satisfaction of statutory criteria.
By: - Raj Jaggi
Unaccounted goods must ordinarily be addressed through tax determination under Section 35(6), read with Sections 73 or 74, rather than through automatic confiscation. The proper officer must determine quantity, value, tax period, taxability, applicable rate, and the taxpayer's explanation through a notice-based adjudicatory process. Confiscation under Section 130 requires independent proof of its statutory conditions and cannot replace tax assessment. A fine in lieu of confiscation depends upon valid confiscation proceedings and cannot survive independently where that foundation is absent.
By: - YAGAY and SUN
Corporate intellectual-property strategy integrates identification, protection, ownership, commercialisation, enforcement, valuation and portfolio management with products, technology, markets and growth objectives. It begins with an IP inventory recording ownership, creation, protection status, jurisdiction, renewal requirements, commercial importance and risks. Innovation should be captured through internal disclosures before public dissemination, enabling a choice between patents, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, designs and contractual protection.
By: - Raj Jaggi
GST appellate pre-deposit conditions require separate satisfaction of two cumulative obligations: full payment of admitted tax and related dues, and deposit of the prescribed percentage of remaining disputed tax. A voluntary payment through a belated Form GSTR-3B return, without protest and accompanied by acceptance of related interest, retains the character of admitted self-assessed tax even if later appropriated against a confirmed demand. Payment during investigation may be considered towards disputed-tax deposit only where contemporaneous evidence establishes that it was made under protest for a liability that remained contested.
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Section 533 confers broad Board rule-making power, subject to Central Government control, for implementing the Income-tax Act, 2025. It covers income determination, non-resident and composite income, perquisites, depreciation, anti-avoidance rules, taxpayer identification, electronic returns, reports, appeals, refunds, interest, foreign-tax relief, and prescribed procedures. Retrospective rules may operate only from the Act's commencement and cannot prejudicially affect assessees unless expressly or necessarily implied. The analysis identifies possible disputes over whether the specifically worded depreciation power supports rules for intangible assets or depreciation based on actual cost.