INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CENTRES AUTHORITY NOTIFICATION Gandhinagar, the 30th March, 2026 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CENTRES AUTHORITY (PENSION FUND) REGULATIONS, 2026 F. No. IFSCA/GN/2026/007.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 28 read with sub-section (1) of Section 12 and sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the International Financial Services Centres Authority Act, 2019; clause (b) of sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of section 1... ... ...

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Legislative Department) New Delhi, the 5th February, 2009/Magha 16, 1930 (Saka) The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 5th February, 2009, and is hereby published for general information :- THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2008 No. 10 OF 2009 [5th February, 2009.] An Act further to amend the Information Technology Act, 2000. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-ninth Year of the Republic of I... ... ...

SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER For the Assessee : Shri Ashwani Kumar CA, Shri Ankur Agarwal, CA For the Revenue : Shri Sujit Kumar, CIT DR ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the Revenue are directed against the common order of the ld. CIT (Appeals)-23, New Delhi dated 29.12.2017 for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16. 2. Since the issues are common and connected, these are being disposed of by this common order. 3. Gr... ... ...

Classification of ductless split-system air conditioners with two-ton capacity remains disputed between the tariff item for ductless split systems and the specific entry for split air conditioners of two tonnes and above. Harmonized System Explanatory Notes describe split systems as ductless installations using a separate evaporator for each area. Conflicting coordinate-bench views classified such systems respectively under the ductless-system entry and the capacity-based entry. The classification issue was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution of the conflicting interpretations.

Appellate enhancement is confined to income sources examined in assessment and cannot introduce sale consideration as a new taxable source where only related expenditure was scrutinised. Advance rental receipts already offered in later years are not taxable again absent accrual in the relevant year, preventing double taxation. Recorded bank credits, loans and advances supported by ledgers, confirmations and banking evidence cannot be treated as unexplained without adverse material. Likewise, no unexplained-investment addition arises for shareholdings acquired in earlier years, while documentary proof of disclosed cash sources and individual-to-HUF transfers shifts the evidentiary burden to the Revenue.

Rental advances already offered to tax in subsequent years should not be taxed again in an earlier year where bank reconciliation establishes lower actual receipts, applying accrual, real-income and anti-double-taxation principles. Appellate enhancement may address an issue or source considered in assessment but cannot introduce a new source of income, such as sale consideration not examined during assessment. Money recorded in books and supported by confirmations, ledgers, PAN details and banking records cannot be treated as unexplained under Section 69A once identity, genuineness and creditworthiness are established. Carried-forward loans, advances, investments, cash deposits and bank transfers remain explained where financial records establish their source and no contrary material is produced.

Regulation 12 is omitted from the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Book-keeping, Accounting, Taxation and Financial Crime Compliance Services) Regulations, 2024. Item 5 of the Second Schedule is correspondingly revised by deleting its reference to regulation 12, leaving only the reference to regulation 11. The amendments take effect upon publication in the Official Gazette.

The Commissioner of State Tax, Goa, withdraws ab initio the GST clarification concerning doubts relating to the supply of Information Technology enabled Services (ITeS). Representations had expressed apprehensions about its implications. The withdrawal is exercised under the power to issue directions for uniform implementation and seeks consistent application of GST provisions across field formations.

Service Companies of Lloyd's IFSC are redefined as service companies registered in India and promoted by Lloyd's Managing Agents, permitted group entities of Managing Agents or Members of Lloyd's, or Indian companies meeting applicable regulatory criteria. The revised definition applies to insurance-business registration in International Financial Services Centres and took effect upon Official Gazette publication on 8 January 2026.

Performance Review Committee composition is amended to require at least two independent experts from relevant fields, replacing the earlier provision permitting up to two such experts. The amendment modifies the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Performance Review Committee) Regulations, 2022 and takes effect upon Official Gazette publication.

Setting aside an assessment without an express remand or direction to make a fresh assessment wipes out the original assessment rather than merely reopening it. Appellate power to require fresh adjudication must be exercised through a clear direction authorising reassessment. Where an assessment was set aside on the basis of Form 26AS but no fresh-assessment direction accompanied the order, the assessment stood annulled, and the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to issue a fresh assessment order on that issue.

On commencement, the earlier 2021 procedure-making regulations are repealed, but actions, purported actions, and commenced processes under that regime retain effect and are treated as arising under corresponding current provisions. Subsidiary instructions issued before commencement are similarly preserved. Regulations, subsidiary instructions, and related actions before or after commencement are not invalid merely because the prescribed procedure was not followed.

Regulation 12 excludes the prescribed regulatory procedure from internal organisational matters, procedural measures or subsidiary instructions not involving substantive policy changes, coordinated decisions, and specified market integrity or national security interventions. It also covers measures required to meet international agreements or similar arrangements where public consultation serves no meaningful purpose. The Authority must be informed whenever the prescribed procedure is not applied.

Periodic review is mandated for each regulation made under regulation 3 every five years, unless an earlier review is warranted. The review assesses objectives, outcomes, implementation, enforcement, related litigation, global best practices, relevance in a changed environment, redundancy reduction, and ease of doing business. Where amendment is warranted, it must be made under the procedure in Chapter III.

Amendments to existing regulations and subsidiary instructions made under regulation 4(2) must comply with the procedural requirements prescribed in Chapter III, subject to regulations 6 and 9. The amendment process therefore applies to both regulations and subsidiary instructions.

Regulation 9 authorises dispensation of public consultation where the Authority considers it expedient in the interest of developing and regulating the financial services market. The power may be used where the time required for consultation would defeat the purpose of proposed regulations or result in undue delay in redressing a problem or market failure.

The Authority may engage stakeholders through additional mechanisms considered appropriate, establish and consult expert or advisory committees for recommendations on drafting or reviewing regulations and subsidiary instructions, and constitute Independent Thematic Review Committees. Independent Thematic Review Committees may conduct focused, independent evaluations of high-priority regulatory themes, including for Regulatory Impact Assessment, on terms considered fit.

Public consultation for proposed subsidiary instructions ordinarily requires a minimum period for public comments. The Chairperson may dispense with consultation or reduce that period by recording reasons in writing, with the decision placed before the Authority for information. Comments must be reviewed, and necessary modifications proposed. The modified proposal and comments must be placed before the Authority or its delegated officer for approval. Before issuance, a summary of comments and a general response must be uploaded on the Authority's website.

Public comments on proposed regulations must ordinarily be invited for at least 21 calendar days. The Chairperson may, for recorded reasons, reduce or dispense with consultation, subject to placing that decision before the Authority. Proposed regulations and public comments must be considered by the Authority, with written reasons for substantial deviations in an approved revised draft. Comment summaries, responses, and justified substantial changes must be published before notification, and substantive changes differing materially from the consultation paper may require repeated consultation.

Public comments must be sought before specified regulations or subsidiary instructions are made. Publication of a consultation paper on the Authority's website is required. The paper must state relevant international norms and regulatory best practices, the problem addressed, regulatory intent and objectives, enabling enactment or regulation, draft measures, and the manner, process, and timelines for public comments.