Advanced Search Options : ❯
Notification No. FA3-13-2017-1-V (1) Dated:- 20-2-2025 Madhya Pradesh SGST
Specified Zonal Additional Commissioners of State Tax are appointed as Appellate Authorities under the Madhya Pradesh GST Act and rule 109A of the Madhya Pradesh GST Rules. They may exercise the powers and perform the duties assigned to Appellate Authorities. Territorial jurisdiction is allocated across Indore Zone-01 and Jabalpur Zone, Indore Zone-02 and Gwalior Zone, and Bhopal Zone. Earlier notifications are superseded, subject to preservation of the notification dated 14 January 2020.
Telescoping of silver sale proceeds against disclosed jewellery purchases defeated penalty based on unreliable capital-gains computation.
Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars could not be sustained where the alleged sale of silver articles was linked to purchases of gold and diamond jewellery disclosed in wealth-tax returns. The stated jewellery purchases were treated as covered by the sale proceeds of the silver articles, warranting telescoping benefit. Because the resulting computation of long-term capital gains was not sufficiently precise or reliable, the penalty was deleted.
Notification No. F A 3-72/2017/1/V(2) Dated:- 24-2-2025 Madhya Pradesh SGST
Madhya Pradesh SGST rate notification is amended to include food inputs for specified food supplies under ICDS or similar schemes approved by the Central or a State Government. The amendment is deemed to have taken effect from 16 January 2025.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 5-8-2026
PTI
Equity market sentiment improved in early trading as lower crude oil prices and foreign fund inflows supported benchmark indices, while investors awaited the monetary policy decision. Softer crude prices, rupee recovery, improving global risk sentiment, resilient economic growth, corporate earnings and sustained foreign portfolio investment supported domestic financial assets, despite continuing global and geopolitical uncertainties.
Notification No. F A 3-11/2018/1/V(3) Dated:- 24-2-2025 Madhya Pradesh SGST
The Madhya Pradesh SGST exemption notification issued under section 11 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is amended by substituting the rate shown against serial number 4 in column (4) of its table. The specified rate is increased from 6% to 9%. The amendment, made in the public interest on the Council's recommendations, is deemed effective from 16 January 2025.
Notification No. F A 3-33/2017/1/V(4) Dated:- 24-2-2025 Madhya Pradesh SGST
Madhya Pradesh SGST rate notification is amended to insert Fortified Rice Kernel (FRK) under the 2.5% Schedule and include FRK in the relevant 9% Schedule entry. The explanation of "pre-packaged and labelled" is substituted to cover retail-sale commodities in packages of not more than 25 kg or 25 litres that are pre-packed and required to bear legal metrology declarations. The amendments are deemed effective from 16 January 2025.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 5-8-2026
PTI
Foreign exchange market movement saw the rupee appreciate against the US dollar in early trading, supported by lower crude oil prices, a softer dollar index, domestic equity gains and net foreign institutional investment. Market attention centred on the Reserve Bank of India's monetary policy decision, with expectations of an unchanged benchmark repo rate. Policy communication on inflation and developments in Hormuz-related talks were identified as factors that could influence the rupee's direction.
By: - Jayaprakash Gopinathan
Administrative discretion must serve statutory purpose, legality, proportionality, reason and public interest, not departmental prestige or institutional rivalry. Government agencies should resolve differences through coordination, consultation and reasoned legal interpretation rather than prolonged confrontation. Litigation is appropriate only where law and public interest require it. Officers must act objectively, fairly and impartially, recognising that firm regulatory enforcement differs from obstinacy. Legitimate trade facilitation and revenue protection are complementary statutory functions.
By: - Raj Jaggi
Legacy Service Tax appeals require issue-based forum selection. Appeals involving ordinary substantial questions of law follow the High Court route, while disputes concerning taxability, classification, rate, valuation, or assessment-linked questions fall within the specialised Supreme Court route. Taxability is connected with rate and assessment because it determines whether the levy applies at all. Saving provisions preserve pending Service Tax proceedings and remedies but do not change the applicable appellate mechanism. Filing before an incorrect forum may cause delay and limitation-related concerns without determination of the merits.
By: - Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Intelligence-based GST enforcement may be initiated by either the Central or State tax administration irrespective of taxpayer assignment. The authority commencing action may investigate, issue a show cause notice, adjudicate and recover. Parallel adjudicatory proceedings on the same subject matter are barred. Proceedings formally commence through issuance of a show cause notice; summons, searches, seizures and preliminary inquiries do not independently constitute adjudicatory proceedings. Both administrations may investigate until identical liability and contravention are established, but duplicate adjudication after an existing show cause notice is not permitted.
By: - Raj Jaggi
Avoidable remand in tax appeals may prolong litigation where the appellate record permits application of settled precedent. Remand may be appropriate for necessary factual verification, unexamined documents, denial of opportunity, or defects requiring fresh adjudication, but should not be a routine disposal method where the appellate forum can decide the merits. A specialised appellate forum should address applicable precedent, relate it to the established facts, and issue a speaking order. Where the law is settled and the record is sufficient, a final reasoned determination promotes finality and reduces repetitive proceedings.
By: - Sadanand Bulbule
Capacity-based cess on pan masala pouch-packing machines is criticised as inconsistent with equality under Article 14 where machines with materially different output capacities attract identical liability. Deemed production and a rigid shutdown-based abatement condition may burden genuine manufacturers whose actual production is substantially lower than presumed capacity. Administrative difficulty in detecting tax evasion cannot replace rational classification, verifiable operational metrics, supply-chain tracking, and field verification. Public-health regulation should remain direct and should not depend on presumptive taxation of harmful commodities.
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
The Income-tax Act, 2025 uses "irrespective of" in place of "notwithstanding" in provisions corresponding to overriding clauses under the Income-tax Act, 1961. "Notwithstanding" is an established device for creating exceptions and giving a provision overriding effect over competing provisions. Although "irrespective of" may communicate a similar sense, its legal operation must be determined from the provision's wording, context, statutory setting, and purpose. The terminology shift may require fresh interpretation of the intended exception or overriding effect.
By: - YAGAY and SUN
International trade risk management requires a continuing process of identifying, assessing, prioritising, mitigating and monitoring cross-border financial, commercial, legal, political, logistical, compliance and cybersecurity risks. Businesses should conduct counterparty and country due diligence, use secure payment mechanisms and foreign exchange hedging, document contracts with governing-law and dispute-resolution provisions, diversify suppliers and transport routes, obtain appropriate insurance, and maintain accurate customs documentation. Predictive tools, including data analytics, supply-chain monitoring and scenario planning, support early detection of currency, market, political and operational disruptions.
By: - YAGAY and SUN
Pharmaceutical export procedures distinguish manufacturers, merchant exporters, and exporters of unapproved, new, or banned drugs. Manufacturers of approved products upload prescribed documents through e-Sanchit and generally need no separate Assistant Drugs Controller clearance. Merchant exporters require a regulatory No Objection Certificate, on which Customs ordinarily relies without duplicate document verification. Exporters of unapproved, new, and banned drugs must obtain a CDSCO certificate before seeking a Manufacturing Licence, ensure Shipping Bill details match it, and obtain amendments for buyer or purchase-order changes. A limited transitional relaxation applies until 30 September 2026.
By: - YAGAY and SUN
Customs administration of temporarily imported duty-free containers is being digitised through electronic monitoring and automated Continuity Bond management. Manual Container Movement Permission is discontinued, while manually executed Continuity Bonds must be registered in the Indian Customs EDI System for automated bond debits and credits through electronic manifests. Pending complete automation, stakeholders must submit electronic quarterly bond and container-status reports. Bond holders remain responsible for timely re-export, accurate records and fulfilment of exemption conditions; non-compliance may lead to bond enforcement, duty recovery with interest and penal proceedings.
Cheque execution presumptions require cogent rebuttal, while revisional review cannot reassess evidence absent perversity in concurrent cheque dishonour findings.
Admission of cheque execution triggers statutory presumptions of consideration and discharge of legally enforceable liability in dishonour proceedings. Those presumptions require cogent rebuttal evidence; an unsupported claim that a blank cheque was given as security, a delayed demand for its return, failure to respond to the demand notice, and unproved allegations of the complainant's financial incapacity do not displace them. Revisional jurisdiction remains supervisory rather than appellate: concurrent factual findings should not be overturned by reassessing evidence unless they are perverse, grossly erroneous, unsupported by material, omit relevant material, or reflect arbitrary discretion. The stated principles support restoration of the concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour.
Effective service of show-cause notice is essential; assessment without notice and response opportunity requires fresh adjudication.
Effective service of the material show-cause notice and assessment order is necessary to provide notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond. Where the assessee was unavailable at its principal place of business, the later notice could not be served, and the registered postal cover containing the assessment order was returned, the assessee did not receive either the notice preceding assessment or the assessment order. The resulting denial of notice and opportunity to respond violates principles of natural justice. Such an assessment must be set aside and remitted for fresh adjudication after due notice.
Revisional powers cannot reopen final assessments on changed opinion; non-imported certified sowing seeds remain purchase-tax exempt.
Revisional jurisdiction cannot reopen a concluded assessment merely because the authority prefers a different applicable determination order; where the appellate authority considered the relevant exemption notifications and its order attained finality, such revision is an impermissible change of opinion. The analysis further states that processed and quality-tested certified seeds developed under a supervised research and development programme for farmers' sowing qualify for exemption where they are non-imported and intended for sowing. On these stated grounds, the Tribunal's deletion of additional tax, interest and penalty was sustained.
Inevitable by-products and job-worked coke remain outside exempt-product reversal and captive-consumption valuation rules in further manufacturing arrangements.
Inevitable coal gas arising during coke manufacture is a by-product rather than a final product, so the payment mechanism for exempted final products under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply. Coke produced on job work and returned to the principal manufacturer for further manufacture is neither sold by the job worker nor consumed by or on behalf of that job worker; captive-consumption valuation under Rule 10A(iii) read with Rule 8 is therefore inapplicable. Valuation based on raw-material cost and job-work conversion charges, adjusted for by-product realisations, supports the duty treatment.