Advanced Search Options : ❯
Condonation of Delay: reasonable cause requires restoration of a first appeal for merits adjudication after due opportunity.
Reasonable cause for delayed filing of a first appeal may arise from business losses, regulatory restrictions on activities, and disputes between partners. Where that explanation is established, the appellate authority should condone the delay and decide the appeal on merits under the appellate framework rather than dismissing it in limine. The appeal is restored for fresh merits adjudication after affording the assessee due opportunity.
Recorded satisfaction under Section 153C must link seized material to the relevant year; unrelated unsecured-loan additions cannot stand.
Section 153C requires recorded satisfaction identifying seized material that pertains to the other person and bears on income for the relevant assessment year. Where the same Assessing Officer handles both the searched and other persons, separate satisfaction notes are unnecessary, but the recorded note must still establish that material-and-year nexus. Satisfaction limited to land-sale documents for assessment year 2010-11 could not support an unsecured-loan addition for assessment year 2012-13 based on a different bundle; the addition was therefore outside the valid scope of the proceedings and deleted.
Unexplained cash credits cannot rest solely on accommodation-entry allegations when documented RTGS repayment remains unverified and undisputed.
Section 68 permits addition of an unsecured loan only where the credit remains unexplained. Information alleging that a lender provides accommodation entries, without verification of contrary banking evidence, does not by itself establish an unexplained cash credit. Where repayment through RTGS is supported by the lender's bank statement and remains neither verified nor disputed by the Revenue, the loan is not liable to addition under Section 68.
Processing adjustments for co-operative interest could not deny eligible Chapter VI-A deductions before the statutory expansion.
For AY 2020-21, section 143(1)(a) did not permit a processing adjustment to disallow a Chapter VI-A deduction; authority for such an adjustment applied only from AY 2021-22. Interest or dividend earned from a co-operative bank may qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), because a co-operative bank is primarily a co-operative society, subject to verification of the interest particulars and eligible amount. Delay caused by bona fide pursuit of rectification may be condoned where it was unintentional and substantial justice outweighs technical considerations.
Section 68 proof requirements protect documented unsecured loans and land-sale advances from unexplained income additions.
Section 68 requires an assessee to establish creditor identity and creditworthiness and transaction genuineness before unsecured loans or creditor balances may be treated as unexplained income. Confirmations, bank statements, income-tax returns, accounts and assessment records can substantiate unsecured loans. For trade creditor balances, ledger extracts, confirmation, audited accounts and banking records may establish advances received against land sales, absent contrary material linking the balances to unaccounted income.
Post-return scrutiny notice requirement invalidates an assessment when no valid notice follows the filed income-tax return.
A notice under Section 143(2) issued before filing of the return does not satisfy the mandatory requirement for a statutory notice after the return is filed. Where no fresh post-return notice is issued, the resulting jurisdictional defect renders the assessment void ab initio. Binding precedents applied by the appellate authority support this consequence, and the assessment cannot be sustained.
Uncorroborated loose-paper notings cannot alone sustain additions for unrecorded income or investment where underlying transactions remain unidentified.
Section 14A disallowance cannot be sustained by relying on interest expenditure that was not claimed, notwithstanding exempt dividend income. Additions for unrecorded profit and out-of-books property investments require corroborative evidence; bald loose-paper entries that do not identify the land, seller, date or nature of transactions are insufficient, particularly where no evidence of purchase or development exists. Receipt of shares under a documented gift was not taxable under Section 56 for the relevant year because the relied-on amendment applied only from 1 January 2009. The disputed additions for the three assessment years were accordingly deleted.
Completion-of-work revenue recognition prevents duplicate taxation of incomplete real-estate project profits and preserves capital-gains treatment for fixed assets.
Work-in-progress previously disclosed and accepted on scrutiny cannot support a recast trading account where books have not been rejected; the related addition was deleted. For incomplete real-estate projects, consistently applying the completion-of-work method requires profit recognition in the relevant years, and an estimated gross-profit addition in an intervening year would result in double taxation; those additions were deleted. Profit from sale of a flat recorded as a fixed asset, rather than stock-in-trade, is taxable as capital gains and not business income. The deletions concerning work-in-progress, project profits and the flat sale were sustained.
Reassessment after limitation fails without fresh material or alleged failure of full and true disclosure.
Reassessment initiated after four years requires fresh tangible material supporting a belief that income escaped assessment and an allegation that the assessee failed to make full and true disclosure of material facts. Examination of an increase in capital, without new material before the Assessing Officer, does not meet the jurisdictional requirement for reopening a scrutiny assessment. In the absence of an allegation linking escapement to inadequate disclosure, the conditions for reassessment were not satisfied. The reassessment and consequential assessment were quashed.
Consequential assessment scope bars new bad-debt claims not arising from matters remitted in revision proceedings.
Consequential assessment following revision under section 263 is limited to matters within the revision order. Additional claims for bad debts written off and for provision for bad and doubtful debts, where they do not arise from the consequential assessment, cannot be admitted in those proceedings. The claims were therefore rejected as outside the permissible scope of the consequential assessment.
Search assessment evidence requires corroboration and identifiable taxable events; cryptic seized records alone cannot support additions.
Search additions require seized material that identifies the taxable event, parties, transaction nature and purpose, and relevant assessment year; vague loose sheets and unverified employee statements cannot, without corroboration, support unexplained-income additions. Presumptions for seized records establish genuineness but do not permit speculative readings of cryptic entries. Payments recorded in books or through banking channels are not unexplained, and entries must be assessed, if at all, in the correct assessment year; unsupported expenditure may remain taxable. A sales abstract reconciled with books and bank receipts does not establish suppressed turnover. Income and related expenditure or investment arising from the same material may be telescoped to prevent double taxation. Mere receivables, cheques, or promissory notes without linkage or actual accrual do not establish taxable income.
Withdrawal of an appeal against a final assessment order resulted in dismissal after no serious objection was raised.
Withdrawal of an appeal challenging a final assessment order was sought through written submissions after the hearing notice had been duly served and no appearance was made for the assessee. With no serious objection to withdrawal, permission was granted and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The procedural result concerns final assessment proceedings.
Unexplained cash credits cannot be sustained where documented unsecured loans establish lender identity, creditworthiness, genuineness, and subsequent repayment.
Unsecured loans supported by lender confirmations, audited accounts, corporate records, bank statements, ledger accounts, interest-payment details and tax deduction evidence may satisfy the requirements for proving lender identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness. Compliance by creditors with statutory information notices and subsequent repayment of loans with interest further supports the evidentiary record. Where the revenue does not identify defects in this documentation, establish that the lenders or transactions are accommodation entries, or undertake effective further enquiry, an addition for unexplained cash credits under Section 68 is unsustainable.
Section 12AB renewal permits charitable institutions without formal founding documents when reliable evidence proves their public charitable existence.
Section 12AB renewal cannot be refused solely because a charitable educational institution lacks a formal trust deed or memorandum of association. Rule 17A accommodates institutions established otherwise than under an instrument. Public-trust registration, sustained educational operations, earlier income-tax recognition, and records evidencing creation and continuing existence may establish charitable status. In the absence of adverse findings on charitable objects, genuineness of activities, or statutory compliance, such evidence supports continued registration as an existing public charitable trust.
Customs, DGFT & SEZ
Dated:- 12-10-2026
Effective CETA implementation depends on accessible tariff schedules, rules of origin and documentation guidance, together with support for businesses navigating tariff reductions, customs procedures, regulatory requirements and procurement opportunities. Committees, working groups and a joint utilisation review are intended to receive business feedback, address implementation issues and improve use of the agreement. Sectoral round tables, delegations and exhibitions, along with mutual recognition and capacity-building, are envisaged to support new exporters, product lines, investment and partnerships.
Customs, DGFT & SEZ
Dated:- 12-10-2026
CETA implementation includes annual exchanges of utilisation data and business feedback, beginning one year after entry into force, to identify barriers to preferential tariff use and support needs. Committees, working groups and government contact points will be established to maintain operational implementation and address emerging issues. Certificates of Origin issued through self-certification support claims for preferential treatment, while tariff-rate quotas apply to specified vehicle imports.
Notification No. 44/2026-27 Dated:- 12-10-2026 Foreign Trade Policy
Prepared Culture Media exports under ITC(HS) Code 38210000 remain free, with a certification procedure available where an importing country requires shipment clearance or health certification. CAPEXIL is to issue a consignment-wise Shipment Clearance Certificate identifying the exporter, registered plant, product, quantity, invoice, loading port, and destination. After shipment, a Health Certificate is to be provided to the buyer and, where required, jointly issued by CAPEXIL and the Regional Animal Quarantine Officer.
Schedule row 6 now permits a three-year post-Class XII graduation with at least 60% marks, subject to a 50% threshold for reserved SC/ST/PwBD posts, or specified postgraduate and professional qualifications. It prescribes conversion of aggregate grade points to percentages, including normalisation of non-10-point scales, and recognises qualifying foreign postgraduate credentials supported by specified equivalence certificates. The amendment removes the desirable requirement of two years' post-enrolment advocacy experience for Grade A legal-stream officers. It also revises approved postgraduate disciplines for the relevant specialist stream, adding areas such as public policy, securities markets and capital markets. The changes take effect upon Official Gazette publication.
Portfolio managers must register as body corporates, maintain prescribed net worth, infrastructure, qualified personnel and continuing fit-and-proper status, while meeting client-grievance, disclosure and change-in-control obligations. Client arrangements require written investment agreements, pre-contract disclosure documents, transparent fees without assured returns or upfront charges, fiduciary conduct and segregation of client assets. Investment activity is subject to client mandates, prudential limits, restrictions on related-party and prohibited transactions, custody, records, audit, periodic reporting and compliance oversight. Special regimes govern eligible fund managers, co-investment managers and mutual-fund-only services. Inspect.....
Certification requirements for securities-market personnel now use "specified person" in place of "associated person", except in the proviso to regulation 3(1). A specified person includes a principal or employee of an intermediary, agent, distributor or other natural person engaged in securities-market business, and employees working in India for foreign portfolio or foreign venture capital investors. Certification may be obtained through an NISM-specified course or programme, in consultation with SEBI, alongside existing routes; related timing provisions are aligned accordingly. Certificate validity and renewal may extend beyond three years where specified by SEBI. Consequential terminology changes apply to the Debenture Trustees and Self Regulatory Organizations Regulations. The amendments took effect on 8 October 2026.