Advanced Search Options : ❯
Section 16 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Security procedures for secure electronic records and secure electronic signatures are to be prescribed by the Central Government. The prescribed procedure must account for prevailing commercial circumstances, including the nature of the transaction, parties' technological sophistication, comparable transaction volume, rejected alternatives, costs of alternative procedures, and practices generally used for similar transactions or communications.
Section 15 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Secure digital signature status depends on an agreed security procedure verifying, at the time of affixation, that the signature is unique to and identifies the subscriber, is created using means under the subscriber's exclusive control, and is linked to the electronic record so that alteration invalidates it. Where these cumulative conditions are satisfied, the signature is deemed a secure digital signature.
Section 14 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Security procedures applied to an electronic record at a specific point in time give the record deemed status as a secure electronic record. This status operates from the moment the security procedure is applied and continues until verification. The deemed classification depends on application of the security procedure and covers the period between its application and verification, establishing the duration of secure electronic record status.
Section 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic-record despatch occurs when the record enters a computer resource outside the originator's control. Receipt occurs on entry into the addressee's designated computer resource, on retrieval where sent to a non-designated resource, or on entry into the addressee's computer resource if none is designated. Despatch and receipt are deemed to occur at the respective parties' places of business, regardless of computer-resource location, subject to contrary agreement.
Section 12 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic-record acknowledgment may be made by any communication or conduct indicating receipt where no agreed form or method exists. If the originator makes acknowledgment a condition of the record being binding, non-receipt causes the record to be deemed never sent. Otherwise, after non-receipt within the applicable period, the originator may give notice, fix a reasonable deadline, and treat the record as never sent if acknowledgment is still not received.
Section 11 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Attribution of an electronic record to its originator arises where the originator personally sends it, where it is sent by a person authorised to act for the originator in relation to that record, or where an information system programmed by or for the originator automatically transmits it.
Section 10 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Central Government rule-making power enables prescription of digital signature types, affixation formats, and identification procedures for persons affixing digital signatures. Rules may establish controls protecting the integrity, security and confidentiality of electronic records or payments and address other matters necessary to confer legal effect on digital signatures.
Section 9 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic governance provisions do not create an enforceable entitlement to require governmental ministries, departments, authorities, or publicly controlled or funded bodies to use electronic records. Such bodies cannot be compelled to accept, issue, create, retain, or preserve documents electronically, or to conduct monetary transactions in electronic form. Electronic governance is enabled without imposing mandatory electronic acceptance or transaction processing on public bodies.
Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Publication in either the Official Gazette or Electronic Gazette fulfils a legal requirement that a rule, regulation, order, bye-law, notification or other matter be published in the Official Gazette. Where publication occurs in either form, the legally deemed publication date is the date of the Gazette first published in any form.
Section 7 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic retention satisfies a legal requirement to preserve records for a specified period where the information remains accessible for subsequent reference, is retained in its original format or an accurately representative format, and contains details identifying its origin, destination, and dispatch or receipt time. Automatically generated transmission-enabling information is excluded from the identification-detail requirement. The provision does not apply where another law expressly requires electronic retention.
Section 6 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 6 enables electronic governance by treating requirements for government filings, licences, approvals, receipts and payments as satisfied when completed through electronic forms prescribed by the appropriate Government. The appropriate Government may make rules governing the manner and format for filing, creating or issuing electronic records, and the method for payment of related fees or charges.
Section 5 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Legal recognition is accorded to digital signatures for statutory authentication and signature requirements. A legal requirement for information or another matter to be authenticated by signature, or for a document to be signed or bear a signature, is satisfied when a digital signature is affixed in the manner prescribed by the Central Government.
Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 4 grants legal recognition to electronic records where another law requires information or other matter to be in writing, typewritten, or printed form. The requirement is fulfilled when the information is made available electronically and remains accessible for subsequent reference.
Section 3 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Authentication of electronic records permits a subscriber to authenticate an electronic record by affixing a digital signature. Authentication is effected through an asymmetric cryptographic system and hash function. The same electronic record produces the same hash result, while reconstruction of the original record from that result and identical results from two electronic records must be computationally infeasible. Verification may be performed using the subscriber's public key; the private and public keys are unique to the subscriber and constitute a functioning key pair.
GST liability of airport duty-free shops and the airport authority's refund mechanism remain under consideration.
GST liability of airport duty-free shops and the mechanism for refunding GST paid by an airport authority to the Department require clarification in light of a Supreme Court decision concerning non-imposition of indirect tax on such shops. Assistance and instructions have been sought on these issues, which remain listed for further hearing.
Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic transactions are defined through computer resources, data, electronic records, originators, addressees and intermediaries. Digital signature authentication uses an asymmetric cryptographic key pair: a private key creates the signature and the related public key verifies both the signer's use of the corresponding private key and the integrity of the electronic record. Digital Signature Certificates are issued to subscribers through licensed Certifying Authorities. Secure systems must reasonably prevent unauthorised access and misuse, operate reliably, serve intended functions and follow generally accepted security procedures.
Section 1 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Information Technology Act, 2000 gives legal recognition to electronic communications and electronic commerce, facilitates electronic filing with Government agencies, and promotes reliable electronic records. It applies throughout India and, subject to its provisions, to offences and contraventions committed outside India. Different provisions may commence on different notified dates. Specified instruments and transactions, including negotiable instruments, powers of attorney, trusts, wills, and transactions involving immovable property, remain excluded; further exclusions may be notified.
Circular No. PUBLIC NOTICE No. 126 / 2026 Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Notice Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Not...
Inter-CFS movement of LCL export cargo from authorised originating CFSs to Allcargo Terminals Ltd. CFS is permitted after grant of a Let Export Order, with cargo moved in Customs-sealed containers for consolidation or assimilation and subsequent export. Each Shipping Bill must move in full; stuffing, sealing, document transfer, gate-out, unloading, de-stuffing, re-stuffing and final removal require Customs supervision, seal verification, endorsements and bond debits. Destination operations require tally records, shipment within 30 days, periodic reporting, safe custody and segregation of cargo. Custodians remain liable for losses, unlawful substitution and non-compliance.
Roasted areca nut classification: high-temperature processing places whole, split, and cut nuts under the specific roasted-nuts tariff entry.
Roasted areca nuts, whether whole, split or cut, fall under tariff item 2008 19 20 as other roasted nuts and seeds. Chapter 20 covers nuts otherwise prepared or preserved, whereas Chapter 8 is confined to drying, dehydration and moderate heat treatment. Repeated high-temperature roasting and cooling produces changes distinct from the processes permitted for Chapter 8 products. HSN Explanatory Notes expressly include dry-roasted, oil-roasted and fat-roasted areca or betel nuts under heading 2008. The specific tariff entry for roasted nuts prevails over the general entry for dried nuts, without recourse to common parlance.
Circular No. PUBLIC NOTICE No. 113/2026 Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Notice Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Notic...
Customs EDI procedures require Customs officers to draw samples when an online AQCS request is made for a Bill of Entry marked for a No Objection Certificate. The system displays a sampling prompt during examination and Out-of-Charge, and prevents clearance unless the requested sample is drawn. Officers must generate and electronically transmit the test memo, dispatch the physical sample with a test memo copy, and access the digitally integrated test report through NOC details.