Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Source-Based Taxation of Foreign Sports and Entertainment Income : Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No.1] of t...
    Taxation of Non-Exempt Life Insurance Payouts : lause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(i)] of the Income Tax Bi...
    Evolution and Harmonization of TDS Provisions on Insurance Commission in Indian Tax Law : Clause 393...
    Legal and Practical Implications of TDS on Contractor Payments : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 6(i)] an...
    Modernizing TDS for Horse Racing : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 3] of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Online Gaming Winnings : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 2] of the Income Tax ...
    Scope, Compliance, and Implications of TDS on Gaming and Lottery Winnings : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.N...
    Reforming TDS on Interest Income : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(ii) & 5(iii)] and 393(4)[Table: S.No...
    Evolution of Tax Deduction at Source on Dividends : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 7] and clause at 393(...
    Evolution of TDS on Interest on Securities : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(i)] & 393(4)[Table: S.No. ...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Provident Fund Withdrawals : Clause 392(7) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Modernizing Tax Deduction at Source on Salaries : Clause 392(1)-(6) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Tax Deduction Failures and Direct Payment Modernizing the Assessee's Obligations :Clause 391 of the ...
    Transforming Tax Deduction and Collection : Clause 390(1) - (3) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Continuity of Tax Liability After Firm Dissolution : Clause 330 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section...
    Joint and Several Liability of Partners for Firm Tax Dues : Clause 329 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Taxation of Successor and Predecessor Partnership Firms : Clause 328 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Assessing the Impact of Constitutional Changes in Firms : Clause 327 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Procedural Compliance and Taxation of Partnership Firms : Clause 326 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Continuity and Change in the Taxation of Partnership Firms : Clause 325 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Source-based taxation requires payers to withhold tax on non-resident sports and entertainment fees, ensuring collection at source.
    Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No.1] mandates a tax deduction at source on payments to non-resident sportsmen, entertainers, and non-resident sports associations or institutions for income referred to in section 211, imposing the obligation on any person making the payment to deduct tax at the earlier of credit or payment. The provision specifies a flat withholding rate, explicitly addresses grossing up for net-of-tax contracts, and is integrated within wider TDS subsections providing exceptions and administrative rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on non-exempt life insurance payouts: mandatory deduction on the taxable component with a declaration option to avoid deduction.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(i)] of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 requires any person paying sums under a life insurance policy, including bonuses and excluding amounts not includible under Schedule II, to deduct TDS at 2% on the "income comprised in such sum". Deduction is required only where the aggregate payout to a payee in a tax year exceeds the specified threshold, and it must be effected at the earlier of credit or payment. Sub-section 6 allows a declaration for non-deduction where estimated aggregate income is below the exemption limit.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on insurance commission: mandatory deduction at earlier of credit or payment, with threshold and declaratory relief.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No.1(i)] requires deduction of tax at source on remuneration or reward for soliciting, procuring, continuing, renewing or reviving insurance business, payable by "any person", at the earlier of credit or payment, when aggregate payments to a payee exceed the specified threshold; rates are those in force and the provision expands scope to include incentives and other remuneration while providing a declaration-based mechanism for no deduction and deeming credit to suspense accounts as credit to the payee.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on contractor payments upheld with clarified scope, invoice rules and procedural reporting for targeted exemptions.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 6(i)] applies TDS to sums for carrying out work, including supply of labour, payable by a designated person, preserving differential rates for individuals/HUFs and others, applying deduction at credit or payment, allowing exclusion of material where separately invoiced, and aggregating payments for threshold purposes, subject to specified exceptions and procedural requirements.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on horse-race winnings: single-transaction threshold triggers deduction at payment, integrated into unified TDS framework.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 3] mandates TDS on horse-race winnings by bookmakers or licensed operators at prevailing rates where winnings in a single transaction exceed the threshold, requires deduction at payment irrespective of mode, and integrates these obligations into Clause 393's unified procedural framework while leaving open interpretive issues such as the definition of "single transaction," aggregation risk, and valuation of non-cash payouts.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on online gaming winnings: mandatory source deduction on net winnings, requiring payer compliance, reporting, and collection for noncash prizes.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 2] mandates TDS on "any income by way of winnings from online game" payable or credited by "any person," requiring deduction at "rates in force" on net winnings (as per Note 1) at the time of payment or credit, irrespective of mode of payment including cash, kind, credits or digital assets; payer obligations include computation, deduction, remittance, certification and reporting, with standard consequences for non-compliance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on gaming winnings: tax must be deducted at payment with a single-transaction threshold and special rules for non-cash prizes.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No.1] requires payers to deduct tax at source at rates in force on winnings from lotteries, puzzles, card games, other games, gambling and betting at the time of payment. The provision applies to cash and in-kind prizes and uses a single-transaction threshold to trigger TDS; payers must ensure tax is paid before releasing non-cash prizes. Online gaming winnings are excluded from this sub-clause and treated separately. General TDS reporting and deposit obligations apply.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on interest: Bill raises senior citizen threshold and consolidates exemptions, altering deductor obligations and clarifying procedures.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(ii) & 5(iii)] prescribes TDS on interest other than on securities by distinguishing banking companies, co operative banks and post offices (subject to higher thresholds) from other specified payers (subject to a lower threshold), fixing time of deduction as credit or payment whichever is earlier, retaining branch wise aggregation where core banking is absent, and allowing intra year adjustment; Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 7] lists exemptions mirroring institutional and co operative carve outs with turnover conditions and freezes new ad hoc notifications after the stipulated cutoff.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on dividends: new Bill mandates deduction before distribution, retaining specified institutional and small-holder exemptions.
    Clause 393(1) requires TDS on all dividends (including preference shares) paid by domestic companies to resident shareholders at a flat rate, deducted before any distribution; Clause 393(4) lists conditional exemptions for specified institutional investors, notified persons, and small individual shareholders receiving dividends by non-cash modes, with exemptions contingent on payee type, payment mode, and aggregate amounts during the tax year.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on interest on securities: consolidated exemptions and clearer procedural rules to streamline withholding compliance.
    The Bill reaffirms TDS on interest on securities payable to residents, requiring deduction at the earlier of credit or payment at prevailing rates, subject to an aggregate annual threshold. It consolidates instrument based and entity based exemptions in a notified table, preserves the government's notification power to add exemptions, and modernizes language to reflect current financial instruments. Procedural rules permit declarations for non deduction with clearer delivery and reporting timelines for payers, require documentation to justify non deduction, and emphasize tracking aggregate payments and timely reporting and deposit to improve compliance and reduce disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deduction at source on provident fund withdrawals ensures immediate withholding at payment for taxable lump sum withdrawals.
    Clause 392(7) requires trustees or authorised persons of recognised provident funds to deduct tax at source at a uniform rate when paying accumulated balances that are includible in the employee's income because exemption conditions under the relevant schedule do not apply; the obligation arises at the time of payment and only where the aggregate payment exceeds a prescribed threshold, with trustees responsible for deposit, recordkeeping and issuing withholding certificates.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Deduction at Source on Salaries modernizes employer TDS obligations and clarifies perquisite and reporting requirements.
    Clause 392 modernizes Tax Deduction at Source on salaries by retaining the employer duty to deduct tax at the average rate on estimated salary payments, preserving the employer option to pay tax on non monetary perquisites (treated as TDS), providing special timing for start up equity perquisites, and requiring employers to consider specified employee declarations (other salary, reliefs, house property loss, other income, and tax deducted elsewhere) subject to limitations on reductions. It mandates prescribed statements, evidence, record keeping, and permits intra year TDS adjustments, with procedural details to be set by rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Direct payment obligation makes the recipient liable where TDS is absent, with deductor deemed in default if both parties fail.
    Clause 391 requires the recipient to pay income tax directly where TDS is not applicable or has not been deducted, includes a deferred payment mechanism for specified securities and sweat equity issued by eligible start-ups as per the Bill's timelines, and creates a deeming fiction rendering the deductor or employer an assessee-in-default if both deductor and assessee fail to discharge the liability, while preserving interest, penalty and crediting consequences.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Collection at Source: payment obligations arise with income receipt and stand independent of later assessments.
    Clause 390 mandates three modes of tax payment-deduction or collection at source, advance payment, and payment under section 392(2)(a)-to be effected "as per this Chapter," establishes that these obligations arise irrespective of later assessment proceedings, and includes a savings provision preserving the substantive charge to tax under section 4(1), thereby ensuring collection mechanisms do not affect the underlying tax liability.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Continuity of tax liability: dissolved firms treated as continuing for assessment, penalties, and recovery under new clause.
    Clause 330 treats a dissolved or discontinued firm as continuing for assessment and recovery, empowering tax authorities to assess total income, impose penalties, and apply all Act provisions; it imposes joint and several liability on partners and legal representatives and permits continuation of proceedings at the stage they stood at dissolution, while preserving other relevant statutory provisions through a saving clause.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Joint and several liability of partners: partners and estates may be pursued for firm tax and related penalties under the new Bill.
    The Bill imposes joint and several liability on every person who was a partner during the tax year and on the legal representatives of deceased partners for tax, penalty and other sums payable by the firm, allowing recovery from the firm or any partner and applying the Act's assessment, recovery and penalty machinery to such liabilities.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Succession of partnership firms requires separate assessments to apportion tax between predecessor and successor periods.
    Clause 328 mandates separate assessments where a firm is succeeded by another: income up to succession is assessed in the predecessor's hands and income thereafter in the successor's hands, with procedural rules to be applied as per Section 313; the clause excludes cases covered by the provision addressing change in constitution, preserving the distinction between succession and mere partner changes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Change in constitution of a firm: assessment on the firm as constituted at assessment time, preserving tax continuity.
    Change in constitution of a firm provides that assessment shall be on the firm as constituted at the time of assessment where partners cease, new partners are admitted (with at least one pre existing partner continuing), or shares change; an exception preserves dissolution on the death of a partner. The clause modernizes language and cross references to updated assessment provisions, maintains continuity in tax liability, and places emphasis on partnership deeds, record keeping, and potential factual disputes over reconstitution versus succession.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural compliance in partnership taxation: noncompliance bars firm deductions for partner payments while avoiding partner double taxation.
    Clause 326 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, applies where a partnership firm fails to comply with Clause 325 procedural requirements; it invokes a non-obstante override to disallow deductions for payments to partners described as interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration, and concurrently excludes those disallowed amounts from taxation in the hands of partners, mirroring the substantive effect of the earlier statute while updating cross-references and structure.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Firm assessment requirements: written certified partnership instrument needed, with non compliance causing denial of partner deductions.
    Clause 325 requires that a partnership be evidenced by a written instrument specifying each partner's share and that a certified copy accompany the return when assessment as a firm is first sought; certification must be by all partners (excluding minors) or relevant predecessors/representatives on dissolution. Once assessed as a firm, continuity of assessment applies unless the firm's constitution or shares change, in which case a revised certified instrument must be filed and the conditions reapply. Failure to comply triggers denial of deductions for payments to partners and prevents those payments from being taxed in the partners' hands.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 156 "Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      3 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 156 Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for a rebate/deduction from income-tax for certain resident individuals based on total income thresholds of Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 12,00,000, with monetary caps of Rs. 12,500 and Rs. 60,000 respectively. It affects resident individual taxpayers and the tax department's computation of tax liability. Effective date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals). The provision is situated under the Bill's rubric "Rebates and reliefs." The clause aims to provide a deduction from income-tax payable for resident individual assessees whose total income falls below specified thresholds. The clause refers to computation "before allowing the deduction under this section" and to tax charged u/s 202(1). Definitions of "resident," "total income," or "income-tax payable" are Not stated in the document (they are presumed to be defined elsewhere in the Bill/Act). The clause contains three sub-sections setting out the conditions and caps for the deduction.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 156 provides as follows (material elements synthesized):

      • Sub-section (1): A resident individual assessee whose total income does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000 is entitled to a deduction from income-tax (computed before this deduction) equal to 100% of income-tax payable or Rs. 12,500, whichever is less.
      • Sub-section (2): Where a resident individual's total income is chargeable to tax u/s 202(1), deductions from income-tax (computed before this deduction) are allowed as follows: (a) if total income does not exceed Rs. 12,00,000, then 100% of income-tax payable or Rs. 60,000, whichever is less; (b) if income exceeds Rs. 12,00,000, then "the income-tax payable on the total income, reduced by total income which is in excess of twelve lakh rupees."
      • Sub-section (3): The deduction under sub-section (2) shall not exceed income-tax payable as per the rates provided in section 202(1).

      Scope: The relief is available only to resident individual assessees and is expressed as a deduction from income-tax chargeable on total income; it expressly contemplates interaction with section 202(1) tax computation.

      Interpretation

      The clause frames the relief as a deduction from the tax liability (not from gross income). The use of caps (Rs. 12,500 and Rs. 60,000) establishes fixed monetary ceilings. Sub-section (2) differentiates treatment depending on whether total income crosses the Rs. 12,00,000 threshold. The reference to tax computed "before allowing the deduction under this section" clarifies the order of computation: tax is calculated first, then the rebate/deduction is applied up to the stated limits. The provision's language in clause (2)(b) is formulaic and requires arithmetic reduction of tax payable by the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No express provisos beyond the numerical thresholds and caps are provided. There is no textual carve-out for non-residents, non-individuals, or particular categories of income; however, the clause is expressly limited to "resident individual assessee." Any other exceptions or exclusions are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Total income = Rs. 4,50,000; income-tax computed before rebate = Rs. 10,000. Under sub-section (1), deduction = 100% of tax payable (Rs. 10,000) or Rs. 12,500 whichever is less; deduction = Rs. 10,000; net tax = nil.
      • Example 2: Total income = Rs. 11,00,000; income-tax computed before rebate (u/s 202(1)) = Rs. 50,000. Under sub-section (2)(a) deduction = 100% of tax payable or Rs. 60,000 whichever is less; deduction = Rs. 50,000; net tax = nil.
      • Example 3: Total income = Rs. 13,00,000; income-tax computed before rebate = Rs. 80,000. Under sub-section (2)(b) deduction = income-tax payable reduced by the excess over Rs. 12,00,000 (i.e., 80,000 minus 1,00,000) per the Bill's formula. Because that arithmetic would produce a negative number (-Rs. 20,000), the limitation in sub-section (3) and general interpretive principle that deduction cannot be negative means the deduction would effectively be nil; the text states the deduction "shall not exceed income-tax payable" but does not expressly address negative results - consequentially, a reasonable administrative interpretation would yield nil deduction. (Note: precise administrative treatment is Not stated in the document.)

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly interacts with section 202(1) - the rebate in sub-section (2) applies where total income is chargeable to tax under that section and sub-section (3) caps deductions to the tax payable "as per the rates provided in section 202(1)." References to other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are Not stated in the document. The Bill does not provide procedural rules for claiming the deduction, nor does it reference forms or assessment mechanics; those matters are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Textual framing of subsection (1): The Bill (old version) uses the phrasing "A resident individual assessee" while the enacted Section uses "An assesse, being an individual resident in India."
        • Practical impact: purely stylistic; no substantive change to coverage (resident individual assessees remain the class eligible).
      • Subsection (2)(b) - Formulation and clarity of the deduction for incomes above Rs. 12 lakh: The Bill (old version) states: "the income exceeds twelve lakh rupees, the income-tax payable on the total income, reduced by total income which is in excess of twelve lakh rupees." The enacted Section states the condition more elaborately: "the total income exceeds twelve lakh rupees and the income-tax payable on such total income exceeds the amount by which the total income is in excess of twelve lakh rupees, an amount equal to the amount by which the income-tax payable on such total income is in excess of the amount by which the total income exceeds twelve lakh rupees."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's wording appears to direct a mechanical reduction of "income-tax payable" by the amount of income in excess of Rs. 12 lakh (a mismatch of units and likely leading to ambiguity/anomalous results). The enacted Section sets a conditional test and then grants a deduction equal to the excess of the tax payable over the excess income-thus the enacted text is clearer and avoids unit-mismatch confusion. In practice, the enacted text limits and clarifies the quantum of rebate available for higher incomes; the Bill's formulation could have produced interpretive and computational difficulties, possibly producing an unintended (and unworkable) formula.
      • Overall clarity and drafting precision: The enacted Section contains more precise conditional language in sub-section (2)(b).
        • Practical impact: reduced ambiguity for assessing officers, taxpayers and tax practitioners when computing the rebate for incomes exceeding Rs. 12 lakh; lowers litigation risk over interpretation of the mathematical reduction contemplated.
      • Subsection (3): Both texts contain identical limiting language that deduction under sub-section (2) shall not exceed income-tax payable as per rates in section 202(1).
        • Practical impact: none; both prohibit the rebate exceeding tax payable under the cited rate provision.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must determine whether total income is within the specified thresholds and whether tax is chargeable u/s 202(1) to ascertain entitlement. The formula in clause (2)(b) can produce ambiguity where the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000 equals or exceeds tax payable; the provision's terse phrasing in the Bill may give rise to interpretive disputes as to whether any deduction is permissible in those cases. The Bill text does not state dispute-resolution or administrative guidance; therefore taxpayers and the department may require clarificatory instructions (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The document does not specify documentation or forms required to claim the deduction. Presumably, computation records showing total income and tax computed before the deduction would be relevant; the document itself is Not stated on record keeping.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 156 provides a tax rebate (deduction from tax payable) for resident individual assessees with total income thresholds at Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 12,00,000.
      • Caps are specified: Rs. 12,500 for incomes up to Rs. 5,00,000; Rs. 60,000 for incomes up to Rs. 12,00,000.
      • For incomes above Rs. 12,00,000, the Bill prescribes a formula reducing tax payable by the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000; the clause's terse wording may generate interpretive issues when the excess equals or exceeds tax payable.
      • The deduction is expressly subject to not exceeding tax payable u/s 202(1); other procedural and definitional matters are Not stated in the document.
      • Practical application requires careful arithmetic and may necessitate clarificatory guidance from the tax authorities to resolve edge cases arising under clause (2)(b).

      Full Text:

      Section 156 Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax