Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NewsGST
    Bill-To Ship-To E-Way Bill Compliance, Portal Closure and Transit Controls: GST E-Way Bills: Rule 13...
    E-Way Bill Requirements Under Rule 138: GST E-Way Bill Framework for Movement of Goods, Transit Docu...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Limits of Website Upload (of Notifications) as Notice for Delegated Legislation Where the Parent Sta...
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Illegality of Arrest and Remand for Non-Supply of Written Grounds: The Two-Hour Pre-Remand Standard ...
    When Trademark Ownership Controversies Fall Outside Insolvency Adjudication: Application of the 'Nex...
    Locus Standi - Intervention by Homebuyer Societies in Insolvency Proceedings: Statutory Limits under...
    NewsBill
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2026-27 for the purpo...
    NewsBill
    Tax rates under section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961
    NewsBill
    Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person.
    NewsBill
    Co-operative Societies
    NewsBill
    Firms
    NewsBill
    Local authorities
    NewsBill
    Companies
    NewsBill
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the tax year 2026-27 for the purposes of ...
    NewsBill
    Tax rates under section 202
    NewsBill
    Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person.
    NewsBill
    Co-operative Societies
    NewsBill
    Firms
    NewsBill
    Local authorities
    NewsBill
    Companies
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NewsGST
    Show AI Summary
    E-way bill compliance strengthens traceability through Ship-To GSTIN capture, voluntary closure, and disciplined transit controls.
    Rule 138 and Rule 138A require pre-movement e-way bill generation, carriage of the prescribed invoice or challan documents, and distance-based validity, with cancellation confined to cases where goods are not transported as declared. The portal advisory adds mandatory Ship-To GSTIN capture in Bill-To/Ship-To transactions and a voluntary post-delivery closure facility, while circular guidance treats transporter godowns as an additional place of business when declared by the recipient. Enforcement under Section 129 and Section 130 distinguishes detention for transit contravention from confiscation linked to intent to evade tax, and minor e-way bill defects are described as technical lapses rather than automatic proof of evasion.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    E-way bill compliance under GST rules governs prior movement information, transit documents, validity, cancellation, and special goods regimes.
    Rule 138 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 governs the e-way bill system for movement of goods and requires prior electronic information before movement begins in specified cases, generally where consignment value exceeds fifty thousand rupees. The rule allocates responsibility for Part A and Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 among registered persons, authorised transporters, e-commerce operators, courier agencies and fallback transporters, while also covering special cases such as job work, handicraft goods, consolidated movement and transport by road, rail, air or vessel. Rule 138A specifies the documents that must accompany the conveyance, Rule 138 provides validity, cancellation and exemption rules, and Rule 138F creates a special intra-State regime for notified precious goods.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Import regulation: Gazette publication is required before a notification binds importers; website uploads do not suffice for enforceability.
    Publication in the Official Gazette is a condition precedent to the enforceability of notifications under Section 3 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; website uploads cannot substitute for Gazette promulgation. Internal references to the "date of this Notification" must be read as the Gazette publication date, and where a notification incorporates paragraph 1.05(b) of the Foreign Trade Policy, transitional protection applies if its objective conditions (LC established before imposition, timely registration, shipment within validity) are satisfied.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Arrest communication: written grounds generally required; oral only temporarily, written copy at least two hours before remand.
    The obligation to communicate grounds of arrest applies across statutes and, as a rule, must be met by supplying written grounds in a language the arrestee understands. In exceptional exigencies oral communication at arrest is permissible temporarily, but a written copy must be provided within a reasonable time and no later than two hours before production for remand; remand papers must include the grounds and explain any delay. Non compliance renders the arrest and remand illegal, though authorities may seek fresh custody after supplying written grounds with reasons for earlier non supply.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Trademark ownership disputes in insolvency require a clear nexus to CIRP; complex title issues belong to full proceedings.
    A disputed trademark cannot be declared an asset of the corporate debtor in summary CIRP proceedings absent a demonstrable nexus with insolvency; where title turns on contested private transactions and rival claims, the approved resolution plan governs stakeholders and summary disposition that effectively alters plan rights is impermissible. Avoidance conclusions require properly pleaded applications, material and notice; absent these safeguards, invoking preferential or undervalued transaction provisions in collateral proceedings violates natural justice.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Homebuyer societies' intervention in insolvency is limited; representation must follow authorised representative routes post-admission.
    Locus standi under the IBC is stage-sensitive: pre-admission proceedings are in personam and participation is confined to the applicant and corporate debtor, while post-admission proceedings are in rem and allow broader standing subject to statutory channels. Individual allottees recognised as financial creditors must be represented through the Code's authorised-representation mechanisms rather than by separate societies asserting membership rights, and inherent tribunal powers cannot create substantive participatory rights absent statutory basis.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax rates for assessment year 2026-27 remain unchanged; schedule placement for advance tax and salary TDS is preserved.
    Tax rates for assessment year 2026-27 remain unchanged and continue to be prescribed either in specific sections of the Income-tax Act (including concessional regimes for domestic companies, cooperative societies and the alternate individual regime) or in the First Schedule. Rates formerly listed in Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 2025 - used for advance tax computation, TDS from salaries and charging tax payable in certain cases - are reclassified as Part I of the First Schedule for AY 2026-27.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Tax rates under section 115BAC prescribe slab rates up to 30% with surcharge tiers and caps on dividend and capital gains.
    Section 115BAC(1A) sets default slab rates for certain resident taxpayers ranging from nil up to 30% above Rs.24,00,000; these apply unless an option under section 115BAC(6) is exercised. Income-tax under clause (1A)(iii) is subject to surcharge tiers (10%, 15%, 25%) based on total-income thresholds, with the surcharge on dividend income and specified capital gains capped at 15% and a 15% cap also for associations of persons consisting only of companies. Marginal relief is available.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Individual tax rates set in the Finance Bill 2026: progressive slabs with higher nil thresholds for senior residents.
    The Finance Bill 2026 prescribes progressive income-tax slabs for individuals, HUFs, associations of persons, bodies of individuals and artificial juridical persons: nil up to Rs. 2,50,000; 5% on Rs. 2,50,001-5,00,000; 20% on Rs. 5,00,001-10,00,000; 30% above Rs. 10,00,000; with higher nil thresholds for resident senior citizens (Rs. 3,00,000 for 60-79 years; Rs. 5,00,000 for 80+), and states these rates mirror the prior year.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Co-operative societies: the Finance Bill preserves the existing three-band income-tax rate structure (10%, 20%, 30%).
    Specified income-tax rates for co-operative societies are set out in Paragraph B of Part I-A of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill. The Bill retains the existing three-band structure: 10% on income up to the first band, 20% on the middle band, and 30% on income above the top band, thereby preserving the prior rate structure for co-operative societies.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Firms' income-tax rate unchanged at 30% under the Finance Bill, specified in Paragraph C of Part I-A.
    The Finance Bill specifies the income-tax rate for firms in Paragraph C of Part I A of the First Schedule, maintaining the rate at 30%.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Local authorities: income-tax rate remains 30% under Paragraph D of Part I-A of the First Schedule in the Finance Bill.
    The Finance Bill specifies the income-tax rate for local authorities in Paragraph D of Part I-A of the First Schedule, fixing the rate at 30% and maintaining continuity for that taxpayer category.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget corporate tax: 25% for smaller domestic firms, 30% generally, 35% for non-domestic, plus surcharge and 4% cess.
    Domestic companies with turnover or gross receipts up to Rs. 400 crore are taxed at 25%; other domestic companies at 30%; non-domestic companies at 35% on income other than that chargeable at special rates. Surcharge rates are unchanged, with the surcharge not applying to income of a specified fund and with a 25% cap on surcharge for persons under the referenced preferential regime for income above Rs. 5 crore (excluding dividend income and certain capital gains). Marginal relief is provided where surcharge applies. A 4% Health and Education Cess applies on income-tax inclusive of surcharge, with no marginal relief for the cess.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax rates for 2026-27 remain unchanged across specified sections and Part I-B of the First Schedule.
    Income-tax rates for the tax year 2026-27 remain unchanged: rate provisions in the Act for domestic companies, individuals/HUFs/AOPs/BOIs/AJPs and cooperative societies and the rates set out in Part I-B of the First Schedule to the Bill are not amended and the existing rate structures continue to apply.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Tax rates under section 202 set default slabs with surcharge bands, surcharge caps for specified cases, and marginal relief.
    Tax rates under section 202 set graded default income-tax slabs for specified taxpayers for 2026-27, subject to an option to elect an alternative regime; a surcharge applies to higher total income bands (with inclusion rules for dividend income and capital gains), surcharge caps where alternative provisions apply and for certain associations of persons, and marginal relief to alleviate threshold impacts.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax 2026-27: new slab rates, optional Part I-B age-based slabs, and revised surcharge caps and relief.
    Section 202 prescribes progressive income-tax slabs for 2026-27 for individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and specified artificial juridical persons, while preserving an option under section 202(4) to adopt the Part I-B rates. Part I-B provides alternative slabs including age-based thresholds for senior and super senior residents. Computed tax (including specified dividend and capital gains) attracts a graduated surcharge with provisos capping surcharge on dividend/capital gains at 15%, limiting surcharge for company-only AOPs to 15%, and reducing the 37% surcharge to 25% for persons taxed under section 202; marginal relief applies.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Co-operative societies: unchanged tax rates, tiered surcharge with marginal relief, and optional lower-rate tax regime with reduced surcharge.
    Co-operative societies are taxed under Paragraph B of Part I B of the First Schedule with rates unchanged from the prior year. Surcharge applies in tiers according to total income, with marginal relief available to reduce surcharge impact where appropriate. A resident co-operative society that satisfies prescribed conditions may elect an alternative lower-rate tax regime; when elected, a specified lower surcharge percentage applies to that tax.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Firms: income-tax rate unchanged; 12% surcharge over one crore rupees with a cap limiting additional tax.
    Firms continue to pay the same specified rate of income-tax as in the prior year. A 12% surcharge applies where a firm's total income exceeds one crore rupees, but the total tax plus surcharge on income exceeding one crore rupees is limited so it does not exceed the tax on one crore rupees by more than the excess income.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Local authorities face the same income-tax rate with a 12% surcharge above one crore, subject to a cap.
    Local authorities remain subject to the same income-tax rate as specified in Paragraph D of Part I-B of the First Schedule; a 12% surcharge on such income-tax applies where total income exceeds one crore rupees, but the combined income-tax and surcharge on income above one crore is limited so it does not exceed the income-tax on one crore rupees by more than the excess amount.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Company tax rates: domestic companies 25% or 30% with opt-in 22% regime; non-domestic companies 35%; specified surcharges apply.
    The Finance Bill, 2026 sets company tax rates: domestic companies pay 25% if turnover/gross receipts for 2024-25 400 crore and under section 199, otherwise 30%; domestic companies may opt for section 200 at 22% with a 10% surcharge. Non-domestic companies are taxed at 35% on income not at special rates. Surcharges: domestic (excluding section 200/201 electors) 7% for income >1 crore 10 crore and 12% for income >10 crore; non-domestic 2% for >1 crore 10 crore and 5% for >10 crore. Marginal relief applies.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 156 "Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      3 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 156 Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for a rebate/deduction from income-tax for certain resident individuals based on total income thresholds of Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 12,00,000, with monetary caps of Rs. 12,500 and Rs. 60,000 respectively. It affects resident individual taxpayers and the tax department's computation of tax liability. Effective date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals). The provision is situated under the Bill's rubric "Rebates and reliefs." The clause aims to provide a deduction from income-tax payable for resident individual assessees whose total income falls below specified thresholds. The clause refers to computation "before allowing the deduction under this section" and to tax charged u/s 202(1). Definitions of "resident," "total income," or "income-tax payable" are Not stated in the document (they are presumed to be defined elsewhere in the Bill/Act). The clause contains three sub-sections setting out the conditions and caps for the deduction.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 156 provides as follows (material elements synthesized):

      • Sub-section (1): A resident individual assessee whose total income does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000 is entitled to a deduction from income-tax (computed before this deduction) equal to 100% of income-tax payable or Rs. 12,500, whichever is less.
      • Sub-section (2): Where a resident individual's total income is chargeable to tax u/s 202(1), deductions from income-tax (computed before this deduction) are allowed as follows: (a) if total income does not exceed Rs. 12,00,000, then 100% of income-tax payable or Rs. 60,000, whichever is less; (b) if income exceeds Rs. 12,00,000, then "the income-tax payable on the total income, reduced by total income which is in excess of twelve lakh rupees."
      • Sub-section (3): The deduction under sub-section (2) shall not exceed income-tax payable as per the rates provided in section 202(1).

      Scope: The relief is available only to resident individual assessees and is expressed as a deduction from income-tax chargeable on total income; it expressly contemplates interaction with section 202(1) tax computation.

      Interpretation

      The clause frames the relief as a deduction from the tax liability (not from gross income). The use of caps (Rs. 12,500 and Rs. 60,000) establishes fixed monetary ceilings. Sub-section (2) differentiates treatment depending on whether total income crosses the Rs. 12,00,000 threshold. The reference to tax computed "before allowing the deduction under this section" clarifies the order of computation: tax is calculated first, then the rebate/deduction is applied up to the stated limits. The provision's language in clause (2)(b) is formulaic and requires arithmetic reduction of tax payable by the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No express provisos beyond the numerical thresholds and caps are provided. There is no textual carve-out for non-residents, non-individuals, or particular categories of income; however, the clause is expressly limited to "resident individual assessee." Any other exceptions or exclusions are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Total income = Rs. 4,50,000; income-tax computed before rebate = Rs. 10,000. Under sub-section (1), deduction = 100% of tax payable (Rs. 10,000) or Rs. 12,500 whichever is less; deduction = Rs. 10,000; net tax = nil.
      • Example 2: Total income = Rs. 11,00,000; income-tax computed before rebate (u/s 202(1)) = Rs. 50,000. Under sub-section (2)(a) deduction = 100% of tax payable or Rs. 60,000 whichever is less; deduction = Rs. 50,000; net tax = nil.
      • Example 3: Total income = Rs. 13,00,000; income-tax computed before rebate = Rs. 80,000. Under sub-section (2)(b) deduction = income-tax payable reduced by the excess over Rs. 12,00,000 (i.e., 80,000 minus 1,00,000) per the Bill's formula. Because that arithmetic would produce a negative number (-Rs. 20,000), the limitation in sub-section (3) and general interpretive principle that deduction cannot be negative means the deduction would effectively be nil; the text states the deduction "shall not exceed income-tax payable" but does not expressly address negative results - consequentially, a reasonable administrative interpretation would yield nil deduction. (Note: precise administrative treatment is Not stated in the document.)

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly interacts with section 202(1) - the rebate in sub-section (2) applies where total income is chargeable to tax under that section and sub-section (3) caps deductions to the tax payable "as per the rates provided in section 202(1)." References to other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are Not stated in the document. The Bill does not provide procedural rules for claiming the deduction, nor does it reference forms or assessment mechanics; those matters are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Textual framing of subsection (1): The Bill (old version) uses the phrasing "A resident individual assessee" while the enacted Section uses "An assesse, being an individual resident in India."
        • Practical impact: purely stylistic; no substantive change to coverage (resident individual assessees remain the class eligible).
      • Subsection (2)(b) - Formulation and clarity of the deduction for incomes above Rs. 12 lakh: The Bill (old version) states: "the income exceeds twelve lakh rupees, the income-tax payable on the total income, reduced by total income which is in excess of twelve lakh rupees." The enacted Section states the condition more elaborately: "the total income exceeds twelve lakh rupees and the income-tax payable on such total income exceeds the amount by which the total income is in excess of twelve lakh rupees, an amount equal to the amount by which the income-tax payable on such total income is in excess of the amount by which the total income exceeds twelve lakh rupees."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's wording appears to direct a mechanical reduction of "income-tax payable" by the amount of income in excess of Rs. 12 lakh (a mismatch of units and likely leading to ambiguity/anomalous results). The enacted Section sets a conditional test and then grants a deduction equal to the excess of the tax payable over the excess income-thus the enacted text is clearer and avoids unit-mismatch confusion. In practice, the enacted text limits and clarifies the quantum of rebate available for higher incomes; the Bill's formulation could have produced interpretive and computational difficulties, possibly producing an unintended (and unworkable) formula.
      • Overall clarity and drafting precision: The enacted Section contains more precise conditional language in sub-section (2)(b).
        • Practical impact: reduced ambiguity for assessing officers, taxpayers and tax practitioners when computing the rebate for incomes exceeding Rs. 12 lakh; lowers litigation risk over interpretation of the mathematical reduction contemplated.
      • Subsection (3): Both texts contain identical limiting language that deduction under sub-section (2) shall not exceed income-tax payable as per rates in section 202(1).
        • Practical impact: none; both prohibit the rebate exceeding tax payable under the cited rate provision.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must determine whether total income is within the specified thresholds and whether tax is chargeable u/s 202(1) to ascertain entitlement. The formula in clause (2)(b) can produce ambiguity where the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000 equals or exceeds tax payable; the provision's terse phrasing in the Bill may give rise to interpretive disputes as to whether any deduction is permissible in those cases. The Bill text does not state dispute-resolution or administrative guidance; therefore taxpayers and the department may require clarificatory instructions (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The document does not specify documentation or forms required to claim the deduction. Presumably, computation records showing total income and tax computed before the deduction would be relevant; the document itself is Not stated on record keeping.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 156 provides a tax rebate (deduction from tax payable) for resident individual assessees with total income thresholds at Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 12,00,000.
      • Caps are specified: Rs. 12,500 for incomes up to Rs. 5,00,000; Rs. 60,000 for incomes up to Rs. 12,00,000.
      • For incomes above Rs. 12,00,000, the Bill prescribes a formula reducing tax payable by the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000; the clause's terse wording may generate interpretive issues when the excess equals or exceeds tax payable.
      • The deduction is expressly subject to not exceeding tax payable u/s 202(1); other procedural and definitional matters are Not stated in the document.
      • Practical application requires careful arithmetic and may necessitate clarificatory guidance from the tax authorities to resolve edge cases arising under clause (2)(b).

      Full Text:

      Section 156 Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax