Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    competitive taxation structure for shipping companies : Clause 228(14) and (15) of the Income Tax Bi...
    Simplified and concessionary method of taxation based on the net tonnage of qualifying ships, rather...
    computation of tonnage income where ships are jointly operated or where multiple companies are invol...
    Computation of Taxable income of the shipping companies based on Tonnage: Clause 227(1)-(6) of the I...
    Comprehensive Review of the Tonnage Tax Scheme : Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sect...
    Presumptive Taxation for Shipping Companies : Clause 226(2)-(6) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Sec...
    Examination of "Qualifying Ship" : Clause 235(i) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VD of t...
    Defining the Qualifying Company under India's Tonnage Tax Regime : Clause 235(h) of the Income Tax B...
    Continuity and Change in India's Tonnage Tax Regime : Clause 226(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Navigating Special Tax Regimes for Shipping : Clause 225 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 11...
    Interpreting Special Provisions for Shipping Companies : Clause 235 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Special Tax Regimes for Investment Funds : Clause 224 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115UB of ...
    special taxation regime for business trusts such as (REITs)/(InvITs) Clause 223 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Special Provisions Relating to Pass-Through Entities in Venture Capital Structures : Clause 222 of I...
    Enforcement and Recovery of Tax on Accreted Income : Clause 352(8) & (9) of the Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Changing Landscape of Interest on Delayed Payment of Tax on Accreted Income : Clause 352(7) of Incom...
    Reforming the Exit Tax Regime for non-profit organizations (NPOs) or charitable institutions : Claus...
    Comprehensive Review of Taxation, Reporting, and Compliance for Securitisation Trusts : Clause 221 o...
    Definitions, Scope, and Impact on the MAT/AMT Regime : Clause 206(19) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Reducing tax avoidance by curbing the excessive use of deductions and exemptions by corporate and se...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Allocation of shared costs and depreciation: apportionment on reasonable basis and fair proportion affects tonnage tax computations.
    Clause 228(14) requires common costs attributable to the tonnage tax business to be allocated on a reasonable basis, with taxpayers maintaining records to support apportionment. Clause 228(15) requires depreciation for assets other than qualifying ships to be apportioned on a fair proportion determined by the Assessing Officer with reference to actual use. Both provisions mirror Section 115VJ, vesting discretion in the AO and preserving the objective of preventing tax arbitrage while increasing documentation and compliance burdens.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax regime: clarifies qualifying shipping income, market value inter company valuation, and related party anti avoidance adjustments.
    Tonnage tax applies to qualifying shipping income measured by net tonnage, defined as profits from specified core shipping activities and prescribed incidental activities; incidental income above a prescribed threshold is excluded. Inter business transfers must be computed at market value, with assessing officer power to use reasonable bases in exceptional cases. Related party arrangements producing more than ordinary profits may be adjusted to reasonable levels. The Central Government may exclude activities or set limits by notification subject to parliamentary laying. Losses in tonnage computation are ignored.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Allocation of tonnage income: proportional or independent computation affects tax treatment of jointly operated qualifying ships.
    Computation of tonnage income for jointly operated qualifying ships follows a two-step approach: where participating companies' shares are definite and ascertainable, income is allocated proportionately to each company; where shares are not definite and ascertainable, tonnage income for each operator is computed as if it were the sole operator. The rule aligns taxation with economic interest, creates documentary and compliance incentives, functions as an anti-avoidance measure, and may interact with cross-border tax rules, requiring clearer guidance on "definite and ascertainable" shares and documentation standards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax regime: ships' taxable income computed by daily tonnage rates and aggregation, excluding deductions.
    Clause 227(1)-(6) prescribes a ship wise tonnage tax: each qualifying ship's tonnage income equals its daily tonnage income multiplied by qualifying days, with daily rates set by a four tier slab linked to certified net tonnage. Tonnage includes certified physical tonnage and prescribed deemed tonnage for slot and sharing arrangements, rounded to the nearest hundred tons. A non obstante clause bars any deductions or set offs, making the computed tonnage income the exclusive tax base under the Part.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax scheme: deemed tonnage income treated as business profits, excluding actual shipping income under eligibility conditions.
    Clause 226(7) mandates that tonnage income be computed under a separate formulaic provision and be deemed to be the profits chargeable under business income, while expressly excluding the actual "relevant shipping income" from tax once the tonnage computation applies; these effects are conditional on compliance with the Part's eligibility, option, separation, and record keeping requirements.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax scheme: elective presumptive taxation for shipping income, requiring separate accounting and exclusive computation under qualifying criteria.
    The tonnage tax scheme is an elective presumptive regime requiring eligible companies operating qualifying ships to compute profits from that business exclusively under the tonnage basis; the tonnage tax business is treated as a separate business with independent computation and accounting, and companies not opting or ineligible must compute shipping profits under the normal provisions of the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Qualifying ship definition governs tonnage tax eligibility by tying registration, certification, and operational use to tax benefit access.
    The definition of qualifying ship in Clause 235(i) requires three operative conditions for tonnage tax eligibility: a minimum net tonnage, registration under the relevant shipping statute or an authorised foreign licence, and a valid certificate evidencing net tonnage. It lists explicit exclusions-vessels providing services normally provided on land, fishing vessels, factory ships, pleasure crafts, harbour and river ferries, offshore installations-and disqualifies vessels used for fishing beyond a specified threshold in a tax year, anchoring eligibility in maritime regulatory certification and operational use.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Place of effective management central to qualifying company status, restricting tonnage tax benefits to genuinely India-managed shipping firms.
    The qualifying company for the tonnage tax regime must satisfy four cumulative conditions: be an Indian company; have its place of effective management in India-defined to include decisions made by executives as well as the board; own at least one qualifying ship; and have its main object as operating ships. Clause 235(h) consolidates these criteria within a broader definitional framework and references updated maritime legislation to clarify eligibility and reduce interpretive disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax eligibility defined by operation status: owners and charterers qualify, long term bareboat lessors excluded.
    Clause 226(1) treats a company as operating a ship or inland vessel if it owns or charters a vessel, including partial charters such as slot, space, or joint charters, and excludes companies that have chartered out vessels on bareboat charter or bareboat charter cum demise terms for periods exceeding three years, thereby distinguishing operational risk bearing operators from passive, long term financiers for purposes of the tonnage tax scheme.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax regime: option to compute shipping income on a tonnage basis with deeming treatment as business profits.
    Clause 225 creates a self-contained tonnage tax regime for companies operating qualifying ships, allowing an option to compute income under its Part with a deeming provision treating that income as profits and gains of business; key operational questions concern the definition of qualifying ships, the option's exercise and lock-in mechanics, and interaction with loss set-off, allowances, and other tax measures.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax definitions: expanded, self-contained eligibility rules broaden coverage and tighten residency and exclusion tests.
    Clause 235 consolidates and expands tonnage tax definitions by explicitly including inland vessels, embedding a detailed qualifying company test requiring Indian residency, ownership of qualifying ships, principal shipping business, and a specified place of effective management; it also defines qualifying ship with tonnage, registration/licensing and certification requirements and enumerated exclusions to prevent abuse.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation preserves investor-level tax treatment of investment fund income while ring-fencing fund-level losses.
    Clause 224 restates a pass-through regime: income from investments in a regulated fund is taxed in the hands of unit holders as if held directly, while business income remains taxable at the fund level. Business losses are ring fenced at the fund; other losses pass through subject to holding period conditions and transitional attribution of legacy losses to unit holders. Income retained by the fund is deemed credited to unit holders at year end and prescribed statements must be furnished to unit holders and tax authorities to secure transparency and enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation for business trusts preserves income character and shifts tax consequences to unit holders with reporting duties.
    The clause establishes a statutory pass-through mechanism under which income distributed by business trusts is deemed to retain its original character and proportion in the hands of unit holders, while subjecting the trust's total income to tax at the maximum marginal rate subject to specified withholding provisions; it also deems certain scheduled categories of distributed income taxable on distribution, carves out specified statutory exceptions, and imposes prescribed reporting obligations on payers to unit holders and tax authorities.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation of venture capital income taxes investors as if invested directly, with reporting and deemed-credit safeguards.
    Pass-through taxation requires that income arising to investors from venture capital companies or funds be taxed in the investor's hands as if invested directly, with the fund and payer furnishing prescribed statements to investors and tax authorities; undistributed income is deemed credited to investors at year-end in proportion to entitlement, while income already included on an accrual basis is not taxed again on actual payment; specified investment funds are excluded and key terms are defined in the schedule.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax on accreted income: transferees and officers may be deemed assessees in default, with liability limited to asset value.
    Clause 352(8) deems the specified person (NPO) and its principal officer or trustee to be assessee in default for unpaid tax on accreted income and applies all recovery provisions of the Act; it also deems a transferee of assets in specified dissolution cases to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. Clause 352(9) limits the transferee's liability to the extent the asset received is capable of meeting the liability, ensuring proportionality in recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Accreted income interest compels prompt tax payment and creates joint personal liability for trustees and principal officers.
    Clause 352(7) imposes simple interest for delayed payment of tax on accreted income, with joint and several liability on the specified person and the principal officer or trustee; interest is computed monthly (any part-month treated as a full month) using an explicit formula, and liable persons are deemed assessee in default to enable statutory recovery mechanisms.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Exit tax on accreted income expands triggers and fixes final levy after prescribed valuation and procedural safeguards.
    A tax on accreted income charges NPOs additional income tax at the maximum marginal rate when specified events occur; accreted income equals aggregate fair market value of assets less total liabilities on a specified date, computed under prescribed valuation methods, with exclusions as prescribed. The Assessing Officer must afford a hearing before ordering tax, the bill sets a detailed table of triggering events and payment timelines, and the tax payment is final with no further credit or deduction allowed.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation for securitisation trust income preserves investor-level taxation while mandating reporting and deemed-accrual rules.
    Clause 221 establishes a pass-through taxation regime for income from securitisation trusts, preserving the character and proportion of underlying income in the hands of investors, deeming unpaid accruals as credited on the last day of the tax year to prevent deferral, requiring prescribed statements to investors and tax authorities, and preventing double taxation by excluding income already taxed on accrual from subsequent inclusion on actual payment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Minimum alternate tax definitions shape MAT/AMT computation and Ind AS transition treatment, narrowing tax arbitrage opportunities.
    Clause 206(19) supplies granular definitions aligning MAT/AMT computation with Ind AS convergence, insolvency law and cross statutory terms. Key terms include adjudicating authority (IBC), convergence date, transition amount with specified exclusions, net worth, company classifications, securities, tribunal, unit (IFSC) and year of convergence. These definitions phase in Ind AS transition impacts, harmonize tax and insolvency treatment, clarify eligibility for concessional AMT rates, and reduce tax arbitrage and interpretive disputes compared with the narrower definitions in Section 115JF.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Minimum alternate tax exclusions: narrow MAT/AMT to specified taxpayers including life insurers, alternative regime opters, presumptive and small taxpayers.
    Clause 206(18) narrows MAT/AMT applicability by exempting companies with life insurance income, taxpayers who opt for specified alternative tax regimes, persons taxed under special or presumptive computation sections, specified funds identified in the Schedule, and non corporate persons whose adjusted total income falls below the statutory threshold; the exclusions reflect sectoral accounting differences, aim to promote concessional regimes and financial competitiveness, and reduce compliance burdens while requiring clear definitions and anti abuse safeguards.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Legal Framework of Rounding Off Total Income in India tax Law : Clause 516 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 288A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      17 July, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 516 Rounding off of amount of total income, or tax payable or refundable.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      The practice of rounding off monetary values in taxation statutes is an established administrative mechanism designed to simplify computation, enhance uniformity, and reduce clerical errors. Both Clause 516 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 288A of the Income tax Act, 1961 address the manner in which total income, as well as tax payable or refundable, is to be rounded off for the purposes of the Act. This commentary provides an indepth analysis of Clause 516, exploring its legislative intent, operational mechanics, and practical implications, followed by a detailed comparative analysis with the existing Section 288A. The discussion also addresses potential ambiguities and the broader significance of such rounding provisions within the Indian tax law framework.

      Objective and Purpose

      The legislative intent behind rounding off provisions is rooted in administrative convenience and the need for clarity in financial transactions. The calculation of total income, tax payable, or refundable can result in figures with decimal values (paise), which are impractical for accounting and payment purposes. By mandating a uniform rounding mechanism, the legislature aims to: Eliminate ambiguity and disputes regarding minor amounts. Streamline accounting and payment processes for both taxpayers and the tax administration. Ensure consistency in the treatment of all taxpayers. Reduce the risk of errors resulting from manual or automated computations involving fractional amounts. Historically, the need for such provisions became evident as the tax base expanded and the quantum of transactions increased, making it necessary to standardize the treatment of minor amounts across the board. The rounding off rules, therefore, serve as a tool for efficient tax administration and compliance.

      Detailed Analysis of Clause 516 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Clause 516 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, reads as follows:

      The amount of total income computed or any amount payable or refundable under this Act, shall be rounded off to the nearest multiple of ten rupees ignoring any part of a rupee consisting of paise and thereafter if such amount is not a multiple of ten, then- (a) such amount shall be increased to the next higher amount which is a multiple of ten, if the last figure in that amount is five or more; or (b) such amount shall be reduced to the next lower amount which is a multiple of ten, if the last figure is less than five, and the amount so rounded off shall be deemed to be the total income of the assessee or the amount payable and refund due, under this Act.

      This provision can be broken down into the following key components:

      1. Scope of Application

      Clause 516 applies to:

      • The amount of total income computed under the Act;
      • Any amount payable under the Act (i.e., tax liability);
      • Any amount refundable under the Act (i.e., tax refund).

      This broadens the scope to explicitly cover not only the total income but also amounts payable and refundable, ensuring comprehensive application throughout the tax computation and settlement process.

      2. Ignoring Paise

      The provision mandates that any part of a rupee consisting of paise shall be ignored. This means that amounts such as Rs. 100.75 are treated as Rs. 100 for the purposes of rounding off. This is a mechanical rule, leaving no discretion to taxpayers or authorities.

      3. Rounding to the Nearest Multiple of Ten

      After ignoring paise, the amount is considered for rounding to the nearest multiple of ten rupees. The mechanics are as follows:

      • If the last digit of the rupee amount is 5 or more, the amount is increased (rounded up) to the next higher multiple of ten.
      • If the last digit is less than 5, the amount is reduced (rounded down) to the next lower multiple of ten.

      This ensures that the rounding is always to the nearest ten rupees, applying the common rules of mathematical rounding.

      4. Deeming Provision

      The amount so rounded off is deemed to be the total income, the amount payable, or the amount refundable under the Act. This legal fiction ensures that the rounded amount is treated as the actual figure for all purposes under the Act, precluding any challenge or dispute over the unrounded amount.

      5. Absence of Exceptions or Discretion

      The provision does not provide for any exceptions or discretionary powers. It is a mandatory rule, applicable in all cases where the computation of total income, tax payable, or refund due is undertaken.

      6. Legislative Clarity and Drafting

      The language of Clause 516 is clear and unambiguous. The step-wise process-first ignoring paise, then rounding off to the nearest ten rupees-is explicitly laid out, reducing the scope for interpretational disputes.

      Comparative Analysis with Section 288A of the Income tax Act, 1961

      Section 288A of the Income tax Act, 1961, as amended, provides as follows:

      288A. The amount of total income computed in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Act shall be rounded off to the nearest multiple of ten rupees and for this purpose any part of a rupee consisting of paise shall be ignored and thereafter if such amount is not a multiple of ten, then, if the last figure in that amount is five or more, the amount shall be increased to the next higher amount which is a multiple of ten and if the last figure is less than five, the amount shall be reduced to the next lower amount which is a multiple of ten; and the amount so rounded off shall be deemed to be the total income of the assessee for the purposes of this Act.

      A detailed comparison of the two provisions is as follows:

      1. Scope

      Section 288A: Applies only to the amount of total income computed under the Act.

      Clause 516: Applies to the amount of total income, as well as any amount payable or refundable under the Act.

      Analysis: Clause 516 specifically expands the scope to include tax payable and refundable, which were not explicitly covered u/s 288A. This expansion removes ambiguity regarding the rounding off of tax amounts, which was previously addressed in Section 288B of the 1961 Act.

      2. Rounding Mechanism

      Both provisions prescribe the same mechanical process: Ignore paise. If the resulting amount is not a multiple of ten, round up if the last digit is five or more, round down if less than five.

      Analysis: The rounding logic remains identical, ensuring continuity in administrative practice.

      3. Legal Effect

      Section 288A: The rounded amount is deemed to be the total income of the assessee for the purposes of the Act.

      Clause 516: The rounded amount is deemed to be the total income, amount payable, or refund due under the Act.

      Analysis: The deeming fiction in Clause 516 is broader and more comprehensive, clearly covering all possible scenarios.

      4. Relationship with Section 288B

      Section 288B of the 1961 Act deals with the rounding off of tax, penalty, interest, or any other sum payable or refundable under the Act, using the same rounding mechanism as Section 288A.

      Analysis: Clause 516 appears to consolidate the rules of both Section 288A (rounding of total income) and Section 288B (rounding of tax and other sums) into a single provision. This consolidation enhances clarity and reduces the risk of interpretative disputes regarding the applicability of separate provisions.

      5. Legislative Evolution

      Section 288A was inserted by the Finance Act, 1966 and amended in 1968 to remove subsection (2) and the Explanation, making it a single, mechanical rule.

      Clause 516 represents a further evolution, consolidating the rules and expanding the scope for administrative efficiency.

      Comparative Table

      AspectSection 288A of the Income tax Act, 1961Clause 516 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025
      ScopeTotal income onlyTotal income, amount payable, and amount refundable
      Rounding MechanismIgnore paise, round to nearest 10 (up if 5+, down if <5)Same as Section 288A
      Legal EffectRounded amount deemed as total incomeRounded amount deemed as total income, amount payable, or refund due
      ConsolidationSeparate provision for tax (Section 288B)Consolidates all rounding rules in one clause

      Practical Implications

      1. For Taxpayers

      Simplicity: Taxpayers benefit from a single, clear rule applicable to all relevant amounts, reducing confusion and the risk of computational errors.

      Predictability: The uniformity of application ensures that taxpayers can accurately predict their tax liabilities or refunds without ambiguity.

      2. For Tax Administrators

      Efficiency: The administrative burden of dealing with minor fractions is eliminated, and a single rule reduces the need for cross referencing multiple provisions.

      Reduction in Disputes: By codifying the rule for all relevant amounts, the scope for disputes regarding rounding off is minimized.

      3. For the Legal System

      Consistency: Judicial interpretation is simplified, as the provision is clear, consolidated, and leaves little room for ambiguity.

      Alignment with Modern Drafting: The move towards consolidation and clarity reflects modern legislative drafting standards, enhancing the overall coherence of the tax code.

      4. For Compliance and Technology

      Automation: The simple, algorithmic nature of the rule facilitates easy implementation in tax computation software and electronic filing systems.

      Potential Issues and Ambiguities

      Despite its apparent clarity, certain issues merit consideration:

      1. Treatment of Negative Amounts

      The provision does not explicitly address the rounding off of negative amounts (e.g., negative income or negative refunds). While such cases are rare, explicit clarification could prevent interpretational disputes.

      2. Application to Other Statutes

      If other tax statutes (e.g., GST, customs) adopt different rounding off rules, there could be inconsistencies in the treatment of tax liabilities across different domains.

      3. Transitional Provisions

      The transition from the 1961 Act to the new Act may require clear rules to ensure that amounts computed under the old Act but payable/refundable under the new Act are rounded off consistently.

      4. Rounding Off at Intermediate Stages

      The provision applies to the amount "computed" or "payable/refundable." It is important to clarify that rounding off should occur only at the final stage, not at intermediate computational steps, to avoid cumulative rounding errors.

      Conclusion

      Clause 516 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a logical and progressive consolidation of the rounding off rules applicable to total income, tax payable, and refunds under the Indian income tax law. By expanding the scope to cover all relevant amounts and consolidating what was previously spread across two sections (288A and 288B) in the 1961 Act, the provision enhances clarity, reduces administrative burden, and aligns with best practices in tax administration. The mechanical and unambiguous nature of the rounding rule ensures uniform application and minimizes the risk of disputes over negligible amounts. While minor clarifications may be required in practice, the provision as drafted is robust and fit for purpose. The move towards consolidation and simplification is a welcome development, and future reforms may focus on harmonizing such rules across all fiscal statutes for greater administrative efficiency.


      Full Text:

      Clause 516 Rounding off of amount of total income, or tax payable or refundable.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax