Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Evolution of Appellate Remedies in Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 356 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Appellate Remedies against Advance Rulings : Clause 389 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 245...
    Evolution of Procedural Regulation in Advance Rulings under Indian Tax Law : Clause 388 of Income Ta...
    The Transformation of Advance Rulings Powers under Indian Tax Law : Clause 387 of the Income Tax Bil...
    Fraud, Misrepresentation, and the Void Ab Initio Doctrine in Advance Rulings : Clause 386 of the Inc...
    Jurisdictional Bar on Parallel Proceedings : Clause 385 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 245...
    Procedure for processing applications for advance rulings in the Indian tax regime : Clause 384 of t...
    Procedural Evolution of Advance Ruling Applications : Clause 383 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Legal Insights on Vacancies and Defects in Advance Ruling Bodies : Clause 382 of Income Tax Bill, 20...
    Administrative Efficiency vs. Judicial Oversight : Clause 381 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Secti...
    Changing Landscape of Advance Rulings in Indian Tax Law : Clause 380 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Evolving ADR Mechanisms in Indian Taxation : Clause 379 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 245...
    Set-off and Withholding of Tax Refunds : Clause 438 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 245 of ...
    Change in the Interest on Tax Refunds under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 437 of the Income Tax Bil...
    Limits on Challenging Completed Assessments in Refund Proceedings : Clause 436 of Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Automatic Refunds under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 435 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Procedural and Substantive Aspects of TDS Refunds : Clause 434 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Limitation, Procedure, and Rights of Refund Claims in Indian Tax Law : Clause 433 of the Income Tax ...
    Refund Entitlement in Special Cases (Death, Incapacity, Insolvency, Liquidation, or Other Causes) : ...
    Statutory Safeguards for Taxpayer Refunds : Clause 431 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 237 of I...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Appellate scope reform consolidates appealable orders, enables faceless appeals and transfers while preserving rehearing safeguards.
    Clause 356 prescribes an exhaustive list of appealable orders before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), defines "status" by cross reference, prohibits appeals where orders are passed by or with approval of authorities above Deputy Commissioner, and empowers the Board to transfer appeals between JCIT(A) and Commissioner (Appeals) with a mandated opportunity of rehearing. It formally enables a government notified faceless disposal scheme-permitting elimination of physical interface and modification of procedural provisions-and authorizes the Board to exclude specified cases or classes from the section's operation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Right of appeal to High Court preserves judicial review over advance rulings with limited condonation and streamlined procedure.
    Clause 389 grants a statutory right of appeal to the High Court against rulings or orders of the Board for Advance Rulings and certain Assessing Officer actions, mandates filing in the prescribed form and manner within a limited period, allows judicial condonation for a short additional interval, omits prior executive scheme-making and modification powers, and relies on Rule 44FA to integrate appeal procedure with jurisdictional High Court practice.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural autonomy for advance rulings enables the Board to set its own procedures, heightening calls for transparency and safeguards.
    Clause 388 vests the Board for Advance Rulings with broad power to regulate its own procedure, subject to the relevant Chapter, enabling the Board to prescribe filing rules, hearing modes, timelines, evidence protocols, order formats and confidentiality mechanisms, while the institutional shift from a quasi judicial Authority to an administrative Board raises concerns about explicit natural justice safeguards, transparency, consistency and the scope of judicial review.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance Rulings powers modernisation clarifies BAR's quasi judicial authority and civil court powers under reformed procedural codes.
    Clause 387 modernises the powers and status of the Board for Advance Rulings by vesting it with civil court powers to summon witnesses, compel document production, receive affidavit evidence and exercise other adjudicatory functions, and by deeming its proceedings to be judicial proceedings that attract penal consequences for perjury and related offences, while limiting the civil court status to specified purposes and aligning cross references with reformed procedural and penal codes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Void ab initio of advance rulings: fraud or misrepresentation may nullify rulings and restore ordinary tax provisions.
    Clause 386 empowers the Board for Advance Rulings to declare an advance ruling void ab initio if found to have been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation, on representation by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or otherwise; the Act is to apply as if no ruling had been made (excluding the period the ruling was in force), and a copy of the order must be sent to the applicant and the tax authority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional bar on parallel proceedings preserves advance rulings' exclusivity for resident applicants and prevents conflicting adjudication.
    Clause 385 imposes a jurisdictional bar barring income tax authorities and the Appellate Tribunal from deciding any issue for which a resident has filed an advance ruling application; the prohibition attaches on filing and pertains only to the specific issue raised, thereby preserving the exclusivity and predictability of the advance ruling mechanism while raising interpretive questions about the definition of "issue" and the treatment of pending proceedings.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance ruling procedure secures binding tax guidance with hearing rights, grounds for rejection, and mandatory communication.
    Clause 384 requires the Board for Advance Rulings to forward applications to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, call for records, and after examination either allow or reject applications. Rejection must follow an opportunity to be heard and a reasoned order, and orders must be communicated to the applicant and tax authorities. Mandatory exclusions include pending proceedings, fair market value determinations, and transactions prima facie designed for tax avoidance; if allowed, the Board must examine further material, hear the applicant or authorised representative, and pronounce a written ruling within the prescribed time frame.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance ruling procedure: streamlined application process with prescribed form, quadruplicate filing, fee and a thirty day withdrawal window.
    Clause 383 establishes a streamlined procedure for advance rulings: applications must state the specific question and be filed in the prescribed form and manner in quadruplicate, accompanied by a prescribed fee, and may be withdrawn within thirty days. The clause retains core procedural features of the prior regime but omits transitional and legacy transfer or opt-out provisions, leaving form, fee, and certain consequences of withdrawal to subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Vacancies and defects immunity preserves validity of advance rulings to prevent collateral challenges and ensure procedural continuity.
    Clause 382 stipulates that no proceeding before, or pronouncement of an advance ruling by, the Board for Advance Rulings shall be questioned or invalidated merely because of any vacancy or defect in the Board's constitution. It applies to both procedural actions and final rulings, reflects the de facto validity principle, and is intended to secure continuity, legal certainty, and protection against collateral procedural challenges, while not extending to defects that negate jurisdiction or involve fraud or bias.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Board for Advance Rulings centralizes administrative advance rulings, prioritizing efficiency but raising independence and legal robustness concerns.
    Clause 381 mandates constitution of one or more Board for Advance Rulings by notification, each comprising two members who are serving tax officers of not below Chief Commissioner rank, nominated by the Board; the provision preserves an administrative, officer-led model akin to the existing framework and emphasizes mandatory establishment, flexibility in number and phased operationalization, while leaving nomination criteria, judicial representation, publication, and appellate design unspecified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance ruling mechanism provides pre transactional tax certainty and access controls for cross border and GAAR related issues.
    Clause 380 defines advance ruling across five categories: rulings for non resident applicants; rulings on transactions between residents and non residents; rulings for specified resident applicants; rulings on computation of total income pending before tax authorities or the Appellate Tribunal; and rulings on whether proposed arrangements are impermissible avoidance arrangements; it links applications to the Bill's procedural section and replaces the Authority with a Board for Advance Rulings, while preserving notification based resident eligibility.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Dispute Resolution Committee provides an opt-in ADR path reducing penalties and granting prosecution immunity for minor tax disputes.
    Clause 379 creates an opt in Dispute Resolution Committee to resolve minor tax disputes by allowing modification of assessment variations, reduction or waiver of penalties, and grant of immunity from prosecution, with Assessing Officers required to implement DRC directions within a prescribed short timeframe; eligibility is confined by a monetary ceiling on variations, exclusions for search/survey or international information cases, and an income threshold as reported in returns, while procedural details and disqualifications are to be prescribed in subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Set-off of tax refunds: authority to adjust refunds against outstanding dues with written intimation and time limited withholding.
    Clause 438 authorises specified tax officers to set off any refund due against sums remaining payable by the taxpayer, subject to mandatory written intimation. If assessment or reassessment proceedings are pending, the Assessing Officer may withhold the refund for a limited, time bound period, but only after recording reasons in writing and obtaining prior approval from the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. The clause streamlines language from Section 245, narrows discretionary grounds for withholding by focusing on pendency of proceedings, and retains procedural safeguards without specifying priority among kinds of dues.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on tax refunds: prescribed entitlement and computation rules ensure compensation for delayed refunds and administrative resolution.
    Clause 437 provides a statutory entitlement to interest on delayed tax refunds, specifying commencement dates for interest based on refund source (advance tax, TCS, tax treated as paid, self-assessment, rectification or excess payment), a materiality threshold exempting trivial refunds, extension of entitlement to deductors, exclusion of periods of delay attributable to the taxpayer or deductor, additional interest for appellate or revision order-related refunds, adjustment and recovery mechanisms for varied refund amounts, and administrative resolution of disputes on excluded periods by a senior tax authority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Finality of assessments: refund claims limited to refunds for wrongly paid or excess tax, not re litigation of settled assessments.
    Clause 436 prevents an assessee, in refund claims, from questioning or seeking review of any assessment or matter that has become final and conclusive; relief in such claims is limited to refund of tax wrongly paid or paid in excess and the provision must be read with appeal, rectification and revision mechanisms to avoid undermining corrective powers elsewhere in the statute.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Automatic refunds on appellate or statutory orders require proactive AO disbursement, subject to reassessment and annulment limits.
    Automatic refunds are mandated when appellate or other statutory orders reduce or annul tax liability, requiring the Assessing Officer to refund excess amounts without a claim, except where the Act provides otherwise. Refunds become due only after a fresh assessment when an order directs reassessment, and where an assessment is annulled the refund is limited to the excess tax paid over tax chargeable on the returned total income. The provision preserves AO obligations, exceptions for set off or stay, and separates principal refund rules from interest entitlement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS refund mechanism for deductors clarifies eligibility, prescribed application procedure, and time bound AO orders.
    Clause 434 creates a statutory TDS refund mechanism allowing a deductor who, under a written agreement, bore withholding tax and later claims no deduction was legally required to apply for refund in the prescribed form; the Assessing Officer must inquire as necessary, provide the applicant an opportunity to be heard, and pass a written order allowing or rejecting the claim within the specified time frame.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Return-based refund claims must be made through the income tax return, tying refund limitation to return filing timelines.
    Clause 433 requires that every refund claim be made by furnishing the return of income under section 263, making return filing the exclusive procedural vehicle for refund claims and implicitly tying limitation to the return filing timelines without providing express condonation or separate application mechanisms.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Refund entitlement: clubbed-income payee and authorised representatives may claim tax refunds when taxpayer cannot act.
    The clause entitles the person in whose total income clubbed income is included to claim the refund attributable to that income, and authorises a legal representative, trustee, guardian or receiver to claim or receive refunds on behalf of a taxpayer who cannot do so because of death, incapacity, insolvency, liquidation or similar cause; procedural formalities and limitation issues are left to subordinate rules and practice.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax refund entitlement preserved: statutory right maintained under new bill with procedural verification by Assessing Officer.
    Clause 431 preserves a statutory right to a refund where a person satisfies the Assessing Officer that tax paid, paid on or treated as paid on their behalf for a tax year exceeds the amount properly chargeable; it covers direct payments and deemed payments (TDS/TCS, advance tax), places an initial procedural burden on the taxpayer, and mirrors Section 237 of the 1961 Act except for the shift from assessment year to tax year, with attendant implications for temporal reference, procedural integration, and ancillary issues such as interest, set offs and standards of verification.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Analysis of Tax Deduction at Source on Securities Income of FIIs and Specified Funds under Indian Tax Law : Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No. 15 & 16], Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 16 & 17] of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 196D of Income Tax Act, 1961

      27 June, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 393 Tax to be deducted at source.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      The taxation of income earned by Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) and specified funds from securities has long been a significant aspect of Indian tax policy, balancing the twin objectives of attracting foreign capital and ensuring tax compliance. Section 196D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provided a dedicated withholding tax regime for FIIs, and, following the emergence of new fund structures and investment vehicles, the law has evolved to address specified funds and related entities.

      With the introduction of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, Clause 393 proposes a comprehensive overhaul of the tax deduction at source (TDS) regime, including detailed tables for payments to both residents and non-residents. Of particular relevance are Clause 393(2) [Table: S.No. 15 & 16] and Clause 393(4) [Table: S.No. 16 & 17], which directly address TDS on income from securities payable to FIIs and specified funds, and the circumstances where such deduction is not required.

      This commentary undertakes a detailed analysis of these provisions, their legislative intent, operational mechanics, interpretative issues, and their comparative positioning vis-`a-vis the existing Section 196D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The discussion is structured to provide clarity on each relevant aspect, highlight practical implications, and identify areas for potential reform or judicial scrutiny.

      Objective and Purpose 

      The legislative intent behind the TDS regime for FIIs and specified funds is twofold: to ensure the collection of tax at the earliest possible point and to provide clarity and certainty to foreign investors regarding their tax obligations in India. Historically, ambiguities in the characterization of income, the applicable rates, and the interaction with double taxation avoidance agreements (DTAAs) have led to litigation and compliance challenges.

      The Income Tax Bill, 2025, through Clause 393 and its detailed tables, seeks to codify and streamline TDS provisions, making them more accessible and operationally efficient. The specific focus on FIIs and specified funds reflects the increasing complexity of cross-border investments and the need to align domestic law with international best practices, while safeguarding the revenue interests of the exchequer.

      Detailed Analysis of Clause 393(2) [Table: S.No. 15 & 16] and Clause 393(4) [Table: S.No. 16 & 17] of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      I. Clause 393(2) [Table: S.No. 15 & 16] - TDS on Income from Securities Payable to FIIs and Specified Funds

      A. Clause 393(2) Table: S.No. 15

      • Nature of Income: Any income in respect of securities referred to in section 210(1) (Table: Sl. No. 1).
      • Payee: Any Foreign Institutional Investor.
      • Payer: Any person.
      • Rate: As per Note 2.

      This provision mandates that any person responsible for making payment of income in respect of specified securities to a Foreign Institutional Investor must deduct tax at source at the rate specified in Note 2. The reference to section 210(1) and Table: Sl. No. 1 is critical, as it defines the universe of "securities" for this purpose.

      Note 2 (not fully reproduced in the excerpt) typically clarifies the applicable rate, which may be the rate prescribed under the Act or the rate as per the relevant DTAA, whichever is lower, subject to the fulfillment of prescribed conditions (such as submission of a tax residency certificate, etc.).

      B. Clause 393(2) Table: S.No. 16

      • Nature of Income: Any income in respect of securities referred to in section 210(1) (Table: Sl. No. 1).
      • Payee: A specified fund, referred to in Schedule VI [Note 1(g)].
      • Payer: Any person.
      • Rate: 10%.

      This item extends the TDS regime to "specified funds," a term that generally refers to Category III Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) set up in International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs), as defined in the relevant Schedules and Notes. The prescribed TDS rate is 10%, aligning with the concessional regime introduced in recent years for such funds to promote the IFSC framework.

      II. Clause 393(4) [Table: S.No. 16 & 17] - Exemptions from TDS for FIIs and Specified Funds

      A. Clause 393(4) Table: S.No. 16

      • Provision for TDS: Income of Foreign Institutional Investors from securities referred to in section 393(2)(Table: Sl. No. 15).
      • Condition for No Deduction: Income, by way of capital gains arising from the transfer of securities referred to in section 210, if payable to a Foreign Institutional Investor.

      This clause provides that no TDS is required on capital gains arising to FIIs from the transfer of securities, reflecting the policy that while such capital gains are taxable in the hands of FIIs, the mechanism of TDS is not triggered. This is in line with the existing regime u/s 196D(2) of the 1961 Act.

      B. Clause 393(4) Table: S.No. 17

      • Provision for TDS: Income of Specified Fund from securities referred to in section 393(2)(Table: Sl. No. 16).
      • Condition for No Deduction: Income exempt at Schedule VI (Table: Sl. No. 1) to (Table: Sl. No. 4).

      This provision ensures that where the income of a specified fund is exempt under the relevant Schedules (typically corresponding to the exempt income u/s 10(4D) of the 1961 Act), no TDS is to be effected. This prevents unnecessary withholding and subsequent refund procedures where the underlying income is statutorily exempt.

      Practical Implications

      A. For Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs)

      The provisions ensure that FIIs are subject to TDS only on income from securities (such as dividends, interest, etc.), and not on capital gains. This distinction is crucial, as FIIs are often subject to different tax rates on capital gains (short-term and long-term) and other income under the Act and relevant DTAAs. The non-applicability of TDS on capital gains facilitates smoother repatriation of sale proceeds and reduces administrative burdens.

      The provision for applying the lower of the domestic rate or DTAA rate (subject to documentation) provides FIIs with the benefit of treaty protection, enhancing India's attractiveness as an investment destination.

      B. For Specified Funds

      Specified funds (typically Category III AIFs in IFSCs) are subject to a 10% TDS rate on income from securities, with an explicit carve-out for exempt income. This supports the policy objective of promoting IFSCs as competitive investment destinations and aligns with the concessional tax regime introduced in recent years.

      The exemption from TDS on exempt income prevents the cash flow and compliance issues that would arise if tax were withheld on income not subject to tax in the first place.

      C. For Payers and Intermediaries

      The clear tabulation of TDS rates and exemptions in the Bill aids compliance for Indian custodians, brokers, and other intermediaries responsible for making payments to FIIs and specified funds. The alignment with treaty provisions and explicit reference to documentation requirements reduces the risk of disputes and penal consequences.

      D. For the Revenue

      The provisions strike a balance between revenue protection (by ensuring TDS on taxable income) and administrative efficiency (by exempting TDS on capital gains and exempt income). The requirement for documentation to avail treaty rates helps prevent abuse and ensures that only eligible entities benefit from concessional rates.

      Comparative Analysis with Section 196D of the Income Tax Act, 1961

      A. Scope and Structure

      Both Section 196D and Clause 393(2) of the new Bill address TDS on income from securities payable to FIIs and specified funds. However, the Bill adopts a tabular format, making the provisions more accessible and operationally clear. The structure allows for easy identification of the applicable rate, payee, payer, and nature of income.

      B. TDS Rates

      • FIIs: Section 196D(1) prescribes a 20% TDS rate (or DTAA rate, if lower). Clause 393(2) Table: S.No. 15 refers to the rate as per Note 2, which is expected to mirror this approach.
      • Specified Funds: Section 196D(1A) prescribes a 10% TDS rate, and Clause 393(2) Table: S.No. 16 does the same.

      C. Exemption for Capital Gains

      Section 196D(2) explicitly provides that no TDS is to be made on capital gains payable to FIIs. Clause 393(4) Table: S.No. 16 replicates this, ensuring continuity and clarity.

      D. Exemption for Exempt Income of Specified Funds

      Section 196D(1A) (proviso) and Clause 393(4) Table: S.No. 17 both provide that no TDS is required on income of specified funds that is exempt under the relevant provisions (Section 10(4D) in the 1961 Act; corresponding Schedule VI in the Bill). This harmonization prevents unnecessary withholding and aligns with the policy of promoting IFSCs.

      E. Operational Aspects

      Both regimes require TDS to be effected at the earlier of credit or payment, and both allow for the application of DTAA rates subject to prescribed documentation (tax residency certificate, etc.). The Bill's tabular format, however, may facilitate better compliance and reduce interpretational disputes.

      F. Ambiguities and Potential Issues

      • Definition of "Securities": Both provisions refer to securities as defined in the respective sections. Any ambiguity in the definition of securities (especially with the proliferation of new financial instruments) could lead to disputes.
      • Interaction with DTAAs: While both regimes provide for the application of lower treaty rates, practical issues may arise regarding documentation, timing, and the scope of "beneficial ownership."
      • Specified Funds: The definition and eligibility criteria for "specified funds" must be clear to prevent misuse or unintended exclusion.

      G. Unique Features of the Bill

      • The Bill's Clause 393(4) provides a consolidated table of exemptions from TDS, which is more user-friendly than the scattered provisos and explanations in the 1961 Act.
      • The Bill's approach allows for easier updates and amendments, as new categories of payees or types of income can be added to the tables without redrafting the entire section.

      H. International Comparison

      Many jurisdictions provide for a reduced or zero withholding tax rate for foreign portfolio investors on capital gains, in line with India's approach. The clarity regarding TDS on exempt income and capital gains in the Bill

      Practical Implications

      For Foreign Institutional Investors

      The continuation of the exemption from TDS on capital gains and the recognition of treaty rates for other income streams is a welcome development, as it reduces the risk of over-withholding and the need for refund claims. The tabular presentation in the Bill may facilitate easier compliance and reduce the risk of inadvertent non-compliance.

      For Specified Funds

      The explicit 10% TDS rate (subject to exemption for non-taxable income) provides certainty for specified funds, particularly those located in IFSCs. The exemption from TDS on exempt income aligns with the policy objective of promoting India as a global asset management hub.

      For Payers (Indian Companies, Asset Managers, Custodians)

      The clarity on timing, rate, and scope of TDS reduces the compliance burden and the risk of penal consequences for under- or over-withholding. The Bill's structure may also facilitate automation and system-based TDS compliance for large custodians and asset managers.

      For Tax Administration

      A streamlined and unambiguous TDS regime reduces administrative workload, minimizes disputes, and enhances the efficiency of tax collection. The new Bill's format may also improve data analytics and risk assessment by the tax authorities.

      Potential Issues and Areas for Clarification

      • Definition Alignment: The definitions of "securities", "specified fund", and "income" should be harmonized across the substantive and procedural provisions to avoid confusion or litigation.
      • Applicability of DTAA: While the general law provides for DTAA override, explicit mention in the TDS provisions (as in the 1961 Act) would enhance clarity for payers and recipients.
      • Procedural Compliance: The onus on payers to identify exempt income (especially for specified funds with mixed portfolios) may require robust documentation and, potentially, certification from the recipient fund.
      • Transition Issues: Implementation of the new Bill may require updated systems and processes for payers, especially for cross-referencing the correct tables and schedules.

      Conclusion

      Clause 393(2) [Table: S.No. 15 & 16] and Clause 393(4) [Table: S.No. 16 & 17] of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, represent a logical evolution of the existing Section 196D regime, retaining its core principles while enhancing clarity, operational efficiency, and alignment with policy objectives. The provisions ensure that FIIs and specified funds are subject to TDS only on income that is taxable, at rates that reflect both domestic law and treaty obligations, and that capital gains and exempt income are not subject to unnecessary withholding.

      The tabular format and consolidated exemption provisions in the Bill are significant improvements, likely to aid compliance and reduce litigation. However, careful attention must be paid to the definitions of securities and specified funds, the operationalization of DTAA benefits, and the prevention of abuse. As India's capital markets continue to evolve, ongoing legislative and judicial scrutiny will be essential to ensure that the TDS regime remains robust, fair, and conducive to investment.


      Full Text:

      Clause 393 Tax to be deducted at source.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax