Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Upholding Fairness and Transparency in Insolvency Resolution: A Landmark Judgment on the IBC
    Case Laws Indian Laws
    Supreme Court Clarifies Vicarious Liability of Directors in Cheque Dishonour Cases
    Case Laws Indian Laws
    Interim Compensation in Cheque Dishonor Cases: Discretion and Due Process, Scope of the word "May"
    Case Laws Indian Laws
    Unraveling the Principles of Delay Condonation: A Comprehensive Analysis by the Supreme Court
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Interpreting Section 80G Provisions: ITAT's Stance on Charitable Institution Registration
    Case Laws Customs
    Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals: Analyzing the CESTAT Judgment on Binding Nature of CBIC Instruct...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Interpreting the Scope and Limits of Sections 153A and 153C: A Judicial Perspective
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Section 153C and the Necessity of AO's Satisfaction: A Detailed Judicial Analysis
    Interpreting E-Way Bill Regulations: High Court's Guidance on Proportionality and Taxpayer Intent
    Case Laws Money Laundering
    PMLA and CrPC: Supreme Court's Interpretation on Summons, Appearance, and Arrest
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Royalty or Business Income? High Court Clarifies Taxation of Remittances against Software Purchase
    Interpreting the CGST Act: A Landmark Judgment on Record Maintenance, Confiscation, and Penalties
    Excess Stock Findings: Invoking Sections 73 and 74 of UPGST Act, Not Section 130
    Case Laws Indian Laws
    Judicial Restraint in SARFAESI Cases: Navigating Alternative Remedies and Writ Jurisdiction
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Complexities
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Faceless Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment: Validity of Notice Issued by the Jurisdictional A...
    News Bills
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2024-25.
    News Bills
    Rates for deduction of income-tax at source during the financial year (FY) 2024-25 from certain inco...
    News Bills
    Rates for deduction of income-tax at source from “Salaries”, computation of “advance tax” an...
    News Bills
    Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person. [Rates fo...
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Case Laws IBC
Show AI Summary
Insolvency plan compliance: failure to acknowledge creditor claims or secure approvals undermines approved resolution plans.
The court held that a recall application grounded in lack of notice and alleged misrepresentation is maintainable under principles of natural justice. It found the resolution plan non-compliant with Section 30(2) read with Regulations 37 and 38-specifically for failing to acknowledge a creditor's claim, misrecording the payable amount, omitting secured creditor classification despite a charge, and proposing use of third-party statutory land without necessary approvals-deficiencies that materially affected the plan's transparency and treatment of creditor classes.
Case Laws Indian Laws
Show AI Summary
Vicarious liability of directors clarified: specific averments required to link a director to company affairs before liability attaches.
The Court held that vicarious liability of a director in cheque dishonour cases cannot be invoked by merely reproducing statutory language or alleging directorship; complaints must contain specific factual averments showing how the director was responsible for or in charge of the company's day to day affairs to link the director to issuance or dishonour of negotiable instruments.
Case Laws Indian Laws
Show AI Summary
Interim compensation discretion: courts must prima facie assess claims and defences before ordering payment under Section 143A.
The Court interpreted Section 143A(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act as conferring a discretionary power to order interim compensation, holding that the word "may" cannot be read as mandatory. Courts must prima facie assess the complainant's case and the accused's defence; the presumption under section 139 alone does not suffice. Interim compensation may be directed only when a prima facie case is established, with the quantum determined after considering transaction nature, parties' relationship, and the accused's paying capacity, and brief reasons must be recorded.
Case Laws Indian Laws
Show AI Summary
Condonation of delay: courts require sufficient cause, balancing strict limitation rules with liberal remedial discretion.
Principles of condonation of delay require balancing the Limitation Act's public policy against stale litigation: Section 3 is to be strictly interpreted while Section 5 is to be construed liberally to allow judicial discretion where sufficient cause is shown. Discretion remains limited by considerations such as inordinate delay, negligence, and lack of due diligence, and prior decisions granting condonation do not automatically justify relief unless the factual matrices are substantially similar.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Registration under Section 80G: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration regardless of prior commencement of activities.
The Tribunal held that institutions granted provisional approval under the First Proviso to Section 80G(5) are entitled to apply for final registration under the proviso's final-registration clause, and that the relevant date of commencement is to be counted from activities undertaken after grant of provisional registration; a prior commencement of activities before provisional grant cannot alone justify rejection of a final-approval application.
Case Laws Customs
Show AI Summary
Binding nature of departmental instructions vs natural justice: tribunals may prioritize procedural fairness over monetary thresholds.
The CESTAT held that CBIC instructions bind departmental officers but do not bind courts and tribunals, which must safeguard natural justice. The Tribunal found the appellate order defective for failing to remit valuation reassessment to the proper officer as statutorily required, treated related Bills of Entry as a single transaction for monetary limit calculation, and invoked its procedural power to hear departmental appeals on merits despite the Board's monetary threshold.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Search assessment provisions under Sections 153A and 153C override ordinary reassessment time limits; asset-threshold verification required.
The judgment holds that search-triggered assessment provisions function as non-obstante clauses displacing ordinary reassessment time limits, distinguishes the enduring liability to tax from the temporal right to assess, prescribes that block periods are computed from the year of search (or date of receipt of seized records for non-searched persons), and treats the asset-represented income threshold as a mandatory, aggregable precondition requiring the assessing officer's recorded satisfaction.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Seized-material nexus under Section 153C: AO must form reasoned satisfaction before reopening assessments for specific years.
Section 153C requires the Assessing Officer to form a reasoned satisfaction that seized material during a search has a bearing on an assessee's total income before initiating assessments; mere discovery is insufficient, and the AO must identify specific assessment years, map incriminating material year-wise, and record reasons to justify abatement or reopening.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
E way bill compliance: omission of conveyance details alone should not justify automatic seizure absent intent to evade tax.
Omission of the vehicle number in Part B of an e way bill, where goods are transferred to a transporter for onward carriage and tax invoiced at applicable rates with registered parties, does not by itself indicate intent to evade tax. Authorities must apply proportionality and consider relevant exemptions and documentary compliance before resorting to detention or seizure under the e way regulatory scheme.
Case Laws Money Laundering
Show AI Summary
Appearance under summons: accused not treated as in custody and need not apply for bail; ED arrest power limited after cognizance.
Appearance pursuant to a summons under section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA does not amount to custody; section 437 CrPC therefore does not apply solely on that basis. Sections 205 and 88 CrPC apply to PMLA complaints-allowing dispensation of personal attendance and bonds-yet acceptance of a bond under section 88 is not a grant of bail. Special Courts may issue warrants under section 70 for non appearance and may cancel such warrants on undertakings. After cognizance under section 4 on a section 44(1)(b) complaint, ED officers cannot arrest the accused under section 19.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Royalty classification of software payments: remittances for software purchases are not treated as royalty under established precedent.
Where distribution agreements or End User License Agreements do not grant any proprietary interest or a right to use copyright, payments for acquiring computer software are not to be characterised as royalty; this conclusion follows controlling precedent and DTAA considerations and renders an Assessing Officer's contrary classification inconsistent with the correct legal interpretation.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Record Maintenance under CGST: due process required before determining tax liability and imposing penalties or confiscating goods.
The judgment emphasizes that maintenance of accurate records, including electronic records under Section 35, is mandatory; tax determination on unaccounted goods under Section 35(6) must follow the procedural safeguards of Sections 73 or 74, including issuance of a show cause notice; confiscation under Section 130 requires proof of statutory prerequisites such as intent to evade tax or failure to account for goods; and penalties under Section 122 must be categorised according to whether tax evasion is quantified, with non-evastion contraventions attracting the statutory ceiling applicable to that category.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Deemed supply from unaccounted stock: tax liability must be determined through assessment procedures, not survey provisions.
Excess or unaccounted stock discovered during a survey constitutes a deemed supply for tax purposes, but the determination and quantification of tax liability on such deemed supply must be effected through the statutory assessment procedure; invoking the survey-specific provision as the primary basis for separate proceedings is inconsistent with the statutory scheme.
Case Laws Indian Laws
Show AI Summary
Judicial restraint in writ jurisdiction: Defer to statutory remedies under SARFAESI to preserve sale finality.
The note explains that High Courts should ordinarily refrain from exercising Article 226 writ jurisdiction where an effective statutory remedy under the SARFAESI Act exists, particularly in recovery matters; confirmed and registered auction sales attain finality and the right of redemption is extinguished, and interference is permissible only in narrow exceptions such as proven fraud, collusion, or clear statutory or procedural violations.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Reopening assessments: procedural compliance and substantive escapement requirements determine validity of reassessment notices.
The judgment examines validity of notices under Section 148, holding that TOLA does not apply retrospectively for the assessment year at issue and notices issued after the statutory cutoff cannot be back-dated. Notices barred by the limitation in Section 149(1) are ineffective. Procedural prerequisites - notably issuance of a Document Identification Number and issuance through automated allocation by the faceless centre rather than direct action by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer - are mandatory. Substantively, reopening requires escapement of income in the form of an asset, expenditure, transaction, event, or book entry; a mere change of opinion or dispute over an ordinarily allowed deduction does not meet that threshold.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Faceless assessment: issuance of section 148 reopening notices by jurisdictional assessing officers inconsistent with faceless regime.
The faceless assessment framework under Section 151A and the Scheme dated 29 March 2022 allocates exclusive jurisdiction to either the Faceless Assessment Officer or the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for issuance of reopening notices and assessments; actions by an authority outside its assigned jurisdiction are inconsistent with the faceless regime and cause prejudice to the taxpayer as a matter of law.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Income-tax rate scheme for optional new tax regime governs slab-based taxation for eligible individuals, with surcharge and cess.
The note confirms tax rates for AY 2024-25 remain unchanged in specified statutory sections and in Part I of the First Schedule, reproduces slabbed rates under the optional section 115BAC regime and explains surcharge rules-including staged surcharge percentages, caps where income includes dividends or incomes under sections 111A/112/112A, marginal relief provisions-and that Health and Education Cess at 4% applies on tax inclusive of surcharge.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Deduction of income-tax at source: updated TDS structure for non-resident capital gains and non domestic companies.
Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill, 2024 prescribes FY 2024-25 rates for deduction of income-tax at source under specified sections; tax is to be deducted per the relevant statutory provisions. The rate for other income paid to a company that is not a domestic company is proposed to be reduced to thirtyfive percent. A revised table sets distinct TDS rates on capital gains for non-residents for transfers before and on or after 23rd July 2024. Other TDS rates generally remain as in the Finance Act, 2023. Surcharge is unchanged and Health and Education Cess remains at four percent for non-residents.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Rates for deduction of income tax at source set TDS and advance tax computation, applicable to accelerated assessments.
Rates for deduction of income tax at source from Salaries and under section 194P and the computation of advance tax are specified in Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill for the relevant fiscal year; those rates also apply to charging income tax in specified accelerated assessment circumstances such as provisional assessment of shipping profits to non residents, assessments of persons leaving India, likely property transfers to avoid tax, and bodies formed for short duration.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Concessional tax regime rates set with graduated slabs and capped surcharge for high income taxpayers under new proposal.
A concessional tax regime under proposed clause (ii) of sub section (1A) of section 115BAC will apply to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and certain artificial juridical persons from assessment year 2025 26, prescribing graded tax rates by income band; an opt out under sub section (6) of section 115BAC makes Part III of the First Schedule applicable. Part III also provides age based higher exempt thresholds for resident senior and super senior citizens and includes capital gains under sections 111A, 112 and 112A in taxable income. Surcharge rates rise with income but are subject to caps, specific restrictions for dividend and specified incomes, limits for associations of companies, a reduced cap for persons under sub section (1A) of section 115BAC, and marginal relief at thresholds.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Powers to Call for Information under the Income Tax Law : Clause 252 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 133 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

30 May, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Clause 252 Power to call for information.

Income Tax Bill, 2025

Introduction

Clause 252 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ("Clause 252") and Section 133 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("Section 133") are pivotal statutory provisions that empower income tax authorities to call for information from various persons, entities, and intermediaries for the effective administration and enforcement of income tax law in India. These provisions play a crucial role in the investigation, assessment, and verification processes, underpinning the ability of tax authorities to ensure compliance, detect evasion, and protect the integrity of the tax system. The significance of such powers has grown in the context of increasing complexity in financial transactions, the proliferation of financial intermediaries, and the need for timely access to information in a globalized economy. Both Clause 252 and Section 133 reflect legislative intent to strike a balance between the investigatory needs of the tax administration and the rights of taxpayers and third parties. This commentary provides a detailed analysis of Clause 252, explores its objectives and practical implications, and undertakes a comparative examination with Section 133, highlighting similarities, differences, and the evolution of statutory powers in this domain.

Objective and Purpose

The primary objective of Clause 252 is to confer broad and flexible powers upon specified income tax authorities to require information from a wide range of persons and entities. The legislative intent is to facilitate the collection of information necessary for the proper conduct of enquiries or proceedings under the Income Tax Act, including assessment, reassessment, and investigation into possible tax evasion or avoidance. Historically, the power to call for information has been a cornerstone of tax administration, enabling authorities to trace the flow of funds, verify the accuracy of returns, and uncover concealed income. The policy considerations underlying these powers include:

  • Ensuring effective tax compliance and enforcement.
  • Deterring tax evasion and avoidance by enhancing transparency.
  • Enabling cross-verification of information provided by taxpayers.
  • Facilitating international cooperation under tax treaties.

Clause 252, like its predecessor, is designed to be comprehensive in scope, covering not only taxpayers but also intermediaries such as banks, brokers, and agents who may possess relevant information.

Detailed Analysis of Clause 252 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 252 is structured into three sub-sections, each delineating the scope, manner, and conditions for exercising the power to call for information.

Sub-section (1): Persons from Whom Information Can Be Called and Nature of Information

Sub-section (1) enumerates six categories of persons or entities from whom information may be required:

  1. General Power to Call for Information (Clause 252(1)(a)):
    The Assessing Officer, Joint Commissioner, Joint Commissioner (Appeals), or Commissioner (Appeals) may require any person, including a banking company or its officer, to furnish requisite information or statements of account and affairs, verified in a specified manner, relating to matters deemed useful or relevant to any enquiry or proceedings.
    Interpretation: This provision is drafted in broad terms, allowing authorities to seek information from any person, not limited to the taxpayer, if such information is considered relevant. The inclusion of banking companies is significant, as banks are often custodians of vital financial data.
  2. Firms (Clause 252(1)(b)):
    Firms may be required to provide returns containing names and addresses of partners and their respective shares.
    Interpretation: This facilitates the identification of persons with a beneficial interest in the firm's income and aids in the allocation of income for tax purposes.
  3. Hindu Undivided Families (Clause 252(1)(c)):
    HUFs may be required to furnish returns of the names and addresses of the manager and members.
    Interpretation: This provision recognizes the unique status of HUFs in Indian law and enables authorities to trace income to individual members.
  4. Trustees, Guardians, or Agents (Clause 252(1)(d)):
    Persons believed to be trustees, guardians, or agents may be required to provide returns of names and addresses of beneficiaries or principals.
    Interpretation: This is critical for uncovering income held on behalf of others and preventing the use of trusts or agency arrangements for tax avoidance.
  5. Assessees Regarding Specified Payments (Clause 252(1)(e)):
    Assessees may be required to furnish statements of names and addresses of persons to whom they have paid, in any tax year, rent, interest, commission, royalty, brokerage, or any annuity (other than those taxable under "Salaries") exceeding Rs. 10,000 or such higher amount as prescribed, with particulars of all such payments.
    Interpretation: This enables authorities to cross-check the claims of recipients and ensure proper reporting of income. The threshold of Rs. 10,000 (or higher if prescribed) reflects an intent to focus on significant transactions.
  6. Dealers, Brokers, Agents, and Stock/Commodity Exchanges (Clause 252(1)(f)):
    Such persons may be required to provide statements of names and addresses of all persons to whom or on whose behalf payments have been made or received in connection with the transfer of assets, along with particulars of all such payments and receipts.
    Interpretation: This provision is vital for tracing transactions in financial markets and preventing the use of exchanges for unreported or illicit transfers.

Sub-section (2): Extension of Power to Other Authorities

Clause 252(2) extends the power under sub-section (1)(a) to the "competent authority" or the "Assistant Director." This ensures that investigatory powers are not unduly concentrated and can be exercised at appropriate levels within the tax administration.

Sub-section (3): Procedural Safeguards and Special Situations

Sub-section (3) introduces important procedural safeguards and special conditions:

  • Approval Requirement (Clause 252(3)(a)):
    Where no proceedings are pending, authorities below the rank of Principal Director/Director or Principal Commissioner/Commissioner (excluding the Joint Director or Assistant Director) must obtain prior approval from the higher authority before exercising the power.
    Interpretation: This is a significant procedural check aimed at preventing misuse or overreach of the power in situations where there is no ongoing proceeding, thereby protecting the interests of persons from whom information is sought.
  • Exercise of Power for International Agreements (Clause 252(3)(b)):
    Income-tax authorities notified u/s 246(2)(a) may exercise these powers for the purposes of an agreement referred to in section 159, even if no proceedings are pending.
    Interpretation: This facilitates India's obligations under tax information exchange agreements and double taxation avoidance agreements, ensuring that information can be obtained even in the absence of a domestic proceeding.

Ambiguities and Potential Issues

While Clause 252 is comprehensive, certain ambiguities and interpretational challenges may arise:

  • The phrase "in the opinion of such authority, will be useful for, or relevant to, any enquiry or proceedings" is subjective and may be prone to challenge on grounds of arbitrariness or lack of specificity.
  • The scope of "any person" is extremely broad and could potentially include entities not directly related to the taxpayer, raising concerns about proportionality and privacy.
  • The threshold for reporting payments (Rs. 10,000 or higher as prescribed) may need periodic revision to reflect inflation and changes in economic conditions.
  • The mechanism for verification and the manner in which statements are to be furnished may require further elaboration in subordinate legislation or rules.

Practical Implications

For Taxpayers and Third Parties

Clause 252 imposes compliance obligations on a broad spectrum of persons, including taxpayers, financial institutions, intermediaries, and fiduciaries. The key implications are:

  • Requirement to maintain detailed records and be prepared to furnish information at short notice.
  • Potential exposure to scrutiny not only for one's own affairs but also for transactions involving others (e.g., payments to third parties, fiduciary relationships).
  • Increased compliance costs, especially for small businesses and intermediaries.
  • Obligation to ensure accuracy and completeness of information provided, as furnishing false or incomplete information may attract penalties or prosecution.

For Tax Authorities

For tax authorities, Clause 252 is a powerful investigatory tool that:

  • Enables effective detection of unreported or concealed income.
  • Facilitates cross-verification of information from multiple sources.
  • Supports international cooperation in tax matters, including exchange of information.
  • Requires careful exercise of discretion and adherence to procedural safeguards to prevent abuse of power and protect the rights of persons from whom information is sought.

Procedural and Compliance Aspects

  • Authorities must specify the manner and form in which information is to be furnished, and may require verification.
  • Where approval is required (in cases where no proceeding is pending), authorities must document the reasons and obtain prior sanction.
  • Persons receiving notices under Clause 252 must comply within the stipulated time and may seek extensions or clarifications if necessary.

Comparative Analysis: Clause 252 vs. Section 133

A close examination reveals both continuity and evolution in the statutory framework.

Structural Comparison

Both Clause 252 and Section 133 are structured to enumerate the categories of persons from whom information can be called and the nature of such information. However, there are notable differences in drafting, sequencing, and the breadth of powers.

Provisions-wise Comparison

Provision Section 133 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Clause 252 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Key Differences/Observations
General Power to Call for Information Clause (6): Any person, including banking company, to furnish information/statements as specified by AO, DC(A), JC, JC(A), or C(A). Clause (1)(a): Any person, including banking company/officer, to furnish requisite information/statements as specified by authority. Clause 252 brings the general power to the forefront (first clause), signaling its primacy. The wording is more expansive ("requisite information") and explicitly includes verification "in such manner specified."
Firms Clause (1): Return of names/addresses of partners and respective shares. Clause (1)(b): Same. No substantive change; language modernized.
Hindu Undivided Families Clause (2): Names/addresses of manager and members. Clause (1)(c): Same. No substantive change; language modernized.
Trustees, Guardians, Agents Clause (3): Names of persons for/of whom acting, and addresses. Clause (1)(d): Same. No substantive change; language modernized.
Assessees: Payments Above Threshold Clause (4): Statement of names/addresses of payees of rent, interest, commission, royalty, brokerage, or annuity (excluding "Salaries") above Rs. 1,000 or prescribed higher amount. Clause (1)(e): Statement for payments above Rs. 10,000 or prescribed higher amount. Threshold increased from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 10,000, reflecting inflation and administrative efficiency by focusing on substantial transactions.
Dealers, Brokers, Exchanges Clause (5): Names/addresses of persons to whom/for whom payments made/received in connection with transfer of assets, with particulars. Clause (1)(f): Same. No substantive change; language modernized.
Authority to Exercise Power AO, DC(A), JC, JC(A), C(A); also, higher authorities (Principal DG, DG, Principal CC, CC, Principal D, D, Principal C, C, Joint D, Deputy D, Assistant D). AO, JC, JC(A), C(A); also, competent authority or Assistant Director (for 1(a)). List of authorities slightly restructured; "competent authority" and "Assistant Director" added for certain powers.
Approval Requirement (No Proceedings Pending) Below Principal D or D or Principal C or C (other than Joint D, Deputy D, Assistant D) must obtain prior approval in cases where no proceedings are pending. Similar; below Principal D or D or Principal C or C (other than Joint D or Assistant D) must obtain prior approval. Deputy Director is omitted in Clause 252, possibly reflecting administrative restructuring.
International Agreements Income-tax authority notified u/s 131(2) can exercise these powers for agreements u/s 90/90A, even if no proceedings pending. Income-tax authority notified u/s 246(2)(a) can exercise these powers for agreements u/s 159, even if no proceedings pending. References updated to correspond to the new Bill's section numbering and international cooperation framework.

Other Observations

  • Modernization and Reorganization: Clause 252 modernizes language, reorganizes the sequence, and updates cross-references to conform with the new Bill's structure.
  • Threshold for Reporting: The increase in the monetary threshold for reporting payments (from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 10,000) is a significant change, reducing compliance burden for small transactions and focusing administrative resources on larger, potentially riskier payments.
  • Verification Requirements: Clause 252 expressly mentions that statements may be required to be "verified in such manner specified," providing explicit authority for the form and manner of verification.
  • Procedural Safeguards: Both provisions retain the requirement for prior approval in cases where no proceedings are pending, but Clause 252 omits reference to Deputy Director, possibly reflecting a rationalization of authority levels.
  • Alignment with International Standards: The express provision for use of these powers in connection with international agreements reflects India's increasing commitment to tax transparency and cooperation.

Conclusion

Clause 252 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 continues the tradition of robust investigatory powers for income-tax authorities, updating and refining the framework established by Section 133 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision maintains the breadth of powers while introducing modernization in language, increasing reporting thresholds, and streamlining the list of authorized officers. The core objectives-ensuring effective tax compliance, facilitating investigation, and supporting international cooperation-remain intact. The procedural safeguards embedded in both provisions reflect a conscious effort to balance investigative needs with the rights and interests of taxpayers and third parties. Looking forward, further clarity may be required through rules or subordinate legislation regarding the manner of furnishing information, verification processes, and the scope of "requisite information." Periodic review of monetary thresholds and the list of authorities empowered to exercise these powers would help ensure continued relevance and proportionality.


Full Text:

Clause 252 Power to call for information.

Topics

Acts Income Tax